How J.P. Morgan is responding to the call of underrepresented founders and consumers of color

    Can innovation be equitable?


    The financial services industry has historically been male-dominated, and the entrepreneurial and startup landscapes tell a similar story — not because there are fewer women founders, but because they face fewer opportunities than men.

    This doesn’t diminish the talent and capability of women entrepreneurs, whose presence in the business world continues to rise. From 2019 to 2023, the number of women-owned businesses grew at almost twice the rate of those owned by men. As of 2024, women own 39.1% of all businesses—more than 14 million—employing 12.2 million individuals and generating $2.7 trillion in revenue. Despite this progress, significant challenges persist: men still hold a larger share of business ownership, and only 7% of unicorn founders are women, according to a recent J.P. Morgan study. These figures are even starker when it comes to minority founders.

    Creating a level playing field isn’t just a matter of fairness; it can be a stepping stone for sparking innovation and unlocking economic growth. Ethnically or racially diverse founders can tap into new markets and address the unmet needs that drive sustainable progress. Closing the revenue gap for diverse entrepreneurs could bring in an additional $667 billion, while bridging the gap between women and men-owned businesses could generate an additional $7.9 trillion for the economy, according to a recent research by Wells Fargo.

    So, what’s holding back this change?

    We know that investor confidence tends to increase when a founder fits a particular mold — whether that means the founder’s gender, ethnicity, or simply having a white male co-founder on the team. But beyond these age-old biases, how are established banks working to narrow this divide and create a more equitable environment for all entrepreneurs in today’s day and age?

    “It starts with the investment in a broad national startup banking business,” Ashraf Hebela, J.P. Morgan’s Head of Startup Banking told me in our recent Tearsheet Podcast episode.

    “Most of the underrepresented minorities as entrepreneurs are sitting at the early stage, and that means having to invest in an early-stage business.”

    Ashraf highlighted the tangible measures financial institutions could implement to tackle this gap and something JPM has been mindful of:


    subscription wall for TS Pro

    Is Chase UK fighting off challengers, or is it the other way around?

      Taking a page from the challenger bank handbook, JPM is diving into the UK market with a modern twist


      In the US, large incumbents like JPMorgan, Morgan Stanley, and Citi have long maintained a stronghold, making it difficult for new entrants to break through and compete with these well-established, resource-rich institutions. The status quo has not changed much to date.

      By comparison, the UK’s banking landscape is gradually opening up with more room for new players to challenge their incumbents. In fact, the last couple of years have seen UK challenger banks pulling out all the stops to make a powerful push in the banking industry.

      The US has a more fragmented regulatory environment, involving both federal and state-level oversight. This complexity, combined with a larger number of dominant traditional banks, has made it more challenging for neobanks to establish the same presence they have in the UK. Moreover, British consumers have been more receptive to digital and mobile banking solutions with improved UI/UX, embracing these services early on. 

      The pulse of UK challenger banks

      UK challengers like Revolut, Monzo, and Starling are among the leading names making notable progress. Although their valuations may have dwindled, they continue to achieve strong revenue growth. Starling continues to hold its ground as one of the UK’s leading neobanks in terms of profitability. Revolut achieved a record profit of $545 million in 2023, while Monzo reported its first annual profit for the year ending February 2023.

      While deposit volumes of these digital banks may not match those of traditional banks, they have benefited from three significant factors contributing to their revenue growth in recent times:

      • Growing customer base
      • Rise in interest rates
      • Expansion to new markets

      The case of Revolut: Take Revolut, for example; although individual deposits may average only a smaller amount from millions of customers, the size of its growing user base means these amounts collectively make an impact. Expanding into new markets and regions has enabled the neobank to reach 45 million global customers, over 9 million of whom are based in the UK. This growth directly leads to an increase in payment volumes and foreign exchange transactions, resulting in higher revenue from fees and commissions. This coupled with interest income on deposits and loans has been a crucial catalyst for accelerating Revolut’s revenue growth.

      In 2023, Revolut reported a total revenue of $2.2 billion, a significant jump of 95% from 2022, when the neobank recorded its lowest revenue growth. 

      This July, Revolut achieved a major triumph by securing a UK banking license, albeit with some restrictions, after a three-year wait for the approval. Although this development could be concerning for established UK banks such as Barclays, Lloyds, HSBC, and NatWest, it creates a clearer pathway for Revolut to directly compete with these major institutions. This advancement also brings the prospect of an IPO closer to reality for the neobank, which is already on its radar.

      Nearly outdoing legacy banks in app downloads?


      subscription wall for TS Pro

      How old banks are infusing new ideas in embedded finance

        We spotlight how J.P. Morgan Payments, Fifth Third, and Wells Fargo are targeting embedded finance


        Tearsheet recently hosted its The Big Bank Theory Awards, shining a spotlight on the game-changers in banking and embedded finance. This year’s awards brought together a dynamic mix of established industry incumbents, innovative startups, and key players shaping the future of financial services.

        In no specific order, the winners feature:

        • J.P. Morgan Payments takes home Best Overall Embedded Finance Platform
        • Wells Fargo is recognized for Best New Embedded Finance Product (for platforms)
        • SoFi is awarded Best New Product
        • DailyPay is crowned Best Payments as a Service Platform
        • April is honored for Best Customer Implementation of Embedded Finance
        • nCino wins Best SaaS Banking Platform
        • Alkami receives Best Banking App
        • Signature Bank of Arkansas is celebrated for the Serving the Underserved Award
        • Newline by Fifth Third is recognized as the Best New Embedded Finance Platform
        • CorServ clinches Best Card Issuing Platform
        • Zeta’s Sparrow secures the Best Banking Card Product
        • Themis is named Best Banking Service Partner

        We offer a front-row glimpse into the exciting developments unfolding in the industry. While some winners are household names attracting media attention, others are quietly making their mark and leaving a lasting impact behind the scenes.

        We explore how this year’s Tearsheet TBBT award-winning incumbent banks are navigating the embedded finance landscape with APIs, partnerships, and proprietary solutions to strengthen their position and adapt to market changes.


        subscription wall for TS Pro

        Apple-Goldman fallout: How to prevent cracks in collaborations

          Industry players share their strategies for building stronger partnerships


          Common threads run through partnerships in dating, dance, and bank-nonbank collaborations alike. While luck may factor in, thorough research, diligence, clear role definitions, and established boundaries can be crucial to taking effective, tangible steps forward and making these relationships successful.

          Although the financial services industry has its share of bank-fintech partnerships that have faltered, there are also success stories where rivals have evolved into collaborative partners, working together for mutual benefit.

          Over time, every bank or fintech discovers what makes or breaks a partnership for them. This experience of being on both ends of the spectrum leads them to adopt a more cautious and deliberate approach to partnerships. That said, what benefits one organization might not apply to another, as effectiveness varies with the type, nature, and scale of the partnership.

          We look at how to manage key aspects and avoid pitfalls to keep partnerships strong, based on perspectives from different players in the financial services industry.

          We’ll also delve into the recent twists in one of the most hotly discussed partnerships of late.


          subscription wall for TS Pro

          From early glory to present challenges: The story of Bank of Hope

            Bank of Hope is building a unified network of banks through mergers — but is it enough?


            Last week, we delved into the story of East West Bank in Southern California, founded by Chinese Americans in 1973, and how it evolved into SoCal’s largest publicly traded bank. Not all SoCal-based minority-owned regional banks, however, share this success story. While some began with strong foundations, they now face challenging conditions, particularly those that have been heavily invested in commercial real estate loans. Bank of Hope, a Korean-owned regional bank based in LA and a subsidiary of Hope Bancorp, finds itself in a similar predicament.

            Genesis and the challenges encountered since

            Originally founded as Wilshire Bank by Korean immigrants in 1980, the institution merged with BBCN Bank in July 2016 and was rebranded as Bank of Hope, with Hope Bancorp as its parent company. Initially centered on the Korean American community, the bank gradually expanded its lending to include other immigrant groups, a shift that signaled its growth. This evolution transitioned the institution from a traditional community bank into a regional bank that now serves consumers, small businesses, and commercial and corporate clients.

            Mergers and acquisitions played a key role in the creation of Bank of Hope and remain central to its growth strategy. But its focus on commercial real estate loans has fueled much of its growth and expansion. Little did the bank know that the pandemic would have a major impact on its growth. The pandemic brought a sharp blow to small and mid-sized lenders, leaving the Bank of Hope burdened with a large number of problematic commercial real estate loans.


            subscription wall for TS Pro

            From Chinatown roots to SoCal’s focus: How East West Bank became SoCal’s largest publicly traded bank

              The tale of how a group of Asian Americans chose to defy the norms in 1973


              When mainstream banks fall short of serving minority communities or immigrants, these groups often face prolonged struggles, waiting for more inclusive solutions or settling for the bare minimum. But in 1973, a group of Asian Americans decided to challenge the status quo. They sought to address these unmet financial needs and took a decisive stand to change this reality.

              Some of the founding figures of the East West Bank management; Image via EWB LinkedIn

              Building a bank from the ground up was a formidable challenge for this minority group. To overcome obstacles, they sought support from friends and allies within the Italian American community to become part of the founding organization, as the government policies at the time did not acknowledge Asian Americans as bank founders.

              This is the story of how East West Bank came to be, evolving into the largest publicly traded bank headquartered in Southern California, the 36th largest bank in the US by assets, and the biggest minority depository institution in the country today.


              subscription wall for TS Pro

              Inside Alex Chriss’s first year leading PayPal

                It’s nearly been a year already — How is Chriss’s journey progressing?

                 

                As fall approached last year, PayPal began a major transformation: a change in leadership. While CEO transitions are not uncommon, this one stood out for PayPal. Daniel Schulman, who had been steering the ship since 2014, was departing. Schulman’s tenure was marked by pivotal moments, including the company’s spin-off from eBay and its evolution into an independent, publicly traded entity. Under his leadership, PayPal redefined itself and expanded its global reach. His departure left considerable expectations for his successor, who would need to navigate not only the legacy of Schulman’s transformative years but also address the company’s challenges at the time, including its underperforming stock that had lost nearly 20% value year-to-date and dwindling active user numbers.

                On September 27, 2023, PayPal began a new chapter with Alex Chriss stepping into the CEO role.

                As the industry digitizes, PayPal’s board sought a leader with a blend of expertise in global payments and technology to drive the company’s growth. When Chriss, who was employed at Intuit, was appointed from a pool of nine candidates, the board expressed strong confidence in their choice. However, the broader industry and analysts had a relatively tepid response, reflecting a cautious curiosity about how Chriss would steer PayPal into its next phase

                A year into his tenure, we take a look at Chriss’s journey at PayPal through key events.


                subscription wall for TS Pro

                Is KeyBank the missing link in Scotiabank’s US market expansion strategy?

                  What happens when the 18th-largest US bank offloads some of its stake to Canada’s third-biggest bank


                  When SVB went under last year, it sent shockwaves through the US financial services industry, impacting every player in some way. Regional banks, however, were hit the hardest.

                  As soon as SVB’s troubles surfaced, regional bank stocks tumbled and have lagged behind the broader US equity market ever since. A year on, the landscape for small banks hasn’t changed much. They are still grappling with declining net interest income, and compelled to offer higher rates to depositors even as borrower demand remains sluggish. Even KeyBank, positioned 18th among US banks with assets of about $185.23 billion, found itself on the losing end of last year’s financial turmoil.

                  Despite the challenges at home, the situation has become a gateway for international players seeking to expand in the competitive US market. Scotiabank, Canada’s third-largest bank with around $1.2 trillion in assets, is among those capitalizing on the opportunity.

                  The deal

                  Earlier this month, Scotiabank agreed to a $2.8 billion investment in KeyCorp, the holding company for KeyBank. Scotiabank plans to buy 14.9% of KeyCorp or about 163 million shares of KeyCorp’s common stock in two installments: an initial $800 million investment and a further $2 billion, subject to the Federal Reserve’s approval.

                  The initial installment is expected to close by the end of Scotiabank’s fiscal fourth quarter in October, with the remaining amount to be finalized in fiscal 2025.

                  Both sides walk away with something


                  subscription wall for TS Pro

                  Payoneer, Robinhood, MoneyLion: Q2 highlights & what’s next on their radar?

                    What are publicly-listed non-bank firms currently focused on?

                     

                    This week, we delve into the recent earnings and future direction of some of the non-bank companies currently in the spotlight.

                    1. Payoneer’s Q2 and the key buyout of Skuad

                    In its recent Q2 earnings update, Payoneer reported a 16% YoY increase in revenue to $239.5 million. The company experienced its sixth straight quarter of volume growth, up 22% YoY to $18.7 billion. B2B volume grew by 40% YoY, leading to an increase in the SMB take rate.

                    On the same day, Payoneer announced its key acquisition of the Singapore-based payroll and HR platform Skuad for $61 million in cash, with up to $20 million more in future payments, combining cash and equity, contingent on meeting specific performance and tenure milestones.

                    This acquisition aims to enhance Payoneer’s role as a business-grade financial stack for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMBs) operating internationally, tapping into global opportunities by exporting goods and services across borders.

                    Skuad will become a new addition to Payoneer’s product suite, integrating payroll and contractor management services. This will facilitate global talent access, international hiring, and cross-border payment automation for Payoneer’s customers.

                    According to Payoneer CEO John Caplan, the acquisition of Skuad is a strategic move that aligns with Payoneer’s product vision.

                    “Our acquisition of Skuad will extend our existing product set and represents Payoneer taking another step toward offering a comprehensive, integrated financial stack for SMBs,” Caplan told me


                    subscription wall for TS Pro

                    The changing tides in the Gen Z-traditional FI relationship

                      Legacy banks are stepping out of their comfort zones to co-exist with non-banks and win over Gen Z

                      Lit, sick, gucci — how do traditional banks measure up in Gen Z lingo? Likely, they’re not even a contender among these words that scream cool and trendy. With the rise of new-age, youth-centric non-bank financial firms, traditional banks might find themselves at the end of the line.

                      It’s not that banks are oblivious, but their longstanding focus on security, slow-moving steps, regulations, and compliance tends to saddle them with a serious and boring image in the eyes of Gen Z.

                      Banks are now implementing tangible actions to adapt and stay competitive with the largest generation, who are currently their customers and also the talent of tomorrow. Growth begins where comfort ends — keeping this in mind, banks are overhauling their strategies related to employment, internal policies, and marketing. However, when it comes to products and services, some are opting for strategic partnerships. 

                      We explore each of these areas to see how some banks are approaching things differently, and, in a few cases, even diverge from the norm and conventional routes.

                      1. The most unusual fusion of traditional banks and TikTok


                      subscription wall for TS Pro