Business of Fintech

‘We don’t need another fintech app’: Why startups need to focus on infrastructure

  • Too many fintech investments are going to the interface of consumer products instead of actually fixing the financial system
  • Consumer fintech may be past its prime, but it may be too early for deep back-end technologies -- Series A is a good place to be
close

Email a Friend

‘We don’t need another fintech app’: Why startups need to focus on infrastructure

Personal finance apps and robo advice are so over, according to VCs at this week’s Future of Fintech conference in New York.

Instead, they’re more interested in the “picks and shovels businesses” — those that create tools for other companies to use when building financial products but not the end product itself — according to Rick Yang, a partner at New Enterprise Associates and a manger in its seed practice. Fraud, compliance, core banking infrastructure; “all the systems which are very aged and banks really do need help with,” said Rebecca Lynn, Canvas Partners’ cofounder and general partner, at the event Tuesday.

“These big banks pay billions of dollars on essentially body shops,” Lynn said, suggesting that spend can be as high as $6 billion on the front end. “That’s just not sustainable as the fraud gets more intense.”

It’s a sentiment that’s been echoed across the industry over the last year from both legacy and startup firms: A new user interface is nice, but what desperately needs disruption in financial services is the plumbing. At the speed other companies in other industries are playing, it won’t be long before a pretty, smooth-running app doesn’t satisfy the customers; they’ll start to expect actual services, like moving money or approving a loan, to run faster. They’ll probably be doing those things with Amazon while banks catch up.

“We don’t need another fintech app frankly,” said Satya Patel, partner at Homebrew Ventures. “It just becomes so rigid; it limits the types of transactions, the ways money can move, the types of customers that can have access — all those things lead to the opportunity to unbundle the industry.”

For easiest example is in peer-to-peer payments apps; most of them operate the same way below the surface: they’re card-to-card transactions with limited access based on who customers bank with. There’s Venmo, PayPal, Facebook Messenger; now there’s Zelle and soon there’ll be payments over Apple’s iMessage. It’s becoming tiring for customers who don’t want to open a new app each time they want to transact. Studies show people use only 5 apps on their smartphones.

The market for consumer-facing fintech is just so crowded now, it would be hard for a robe-adviser to enter the market and try to challenge Wealthfront and Betterment; there’s a wealth of financial management apps like Moven and Clarity — and many Mint users are still use it avidly; online lending doesn’t need another SoFi or OnDeck.

“Personal finance and robo — that ship has sailed,” Lynn said.

However, infrastructure startups might be able to re-energize consumer fintech, Yang said.

“Consumer is crowded and a very hard place to invest, but if you look at the biggest outcomes and where all the success is, it’s all consumer products,” he said. “You can’t talk to an early stage fintech company that’s not using or thinking about using Plaid,” the data sharing startup employed by apps like Robin Hood.

Although other infrastructure startups (like some blockchain companies) have enormous opportunities but may not be ready.

Lynn said she’s most motivated by the Series A to B space where there’s just enough product-market fit that a firm can focus on helping those companies scale, one of the biggest dilemmas for startups.

“Being too early is no different than being wrong in venture,” Lynn said. “Let the first mover go out and then you come in behind them and are born from their mistakes. And then you build a company better.”

0 comments on “‘We don’t need another fintech app’: Why startups need to focus on infrastructure”

Business of Fintech

Q1 fintech earnings: stocks in the red, but growth prospects abound

  • Fintech stocks continue to dive in public markets as macroeconomic trends weighed on companies' first quarter earnings, which came in below equity analysts' expectations.
  • We look at four major fintech players that reported their results – PayPal, Square, Robinhood and LendingClub – and outline the major takeaways from their Q1 earnings reports.
Iulia Ciutina | May 09, 2022
Business of Fintech, Member Exclusive

Fintech valuations seriously challenged after a booming 2021

  • Private and public markets are taking a more cautious approach towards valuing fintechs, as the recent market sell-off coupled with macro headwinds are raising concerns.
  • This comes in contrast with the optimism displayed last year, which saw record numbers of capital pouring in the fintech sector, and wave of fintechs going public.
Iulia Ciutina | March 23, 2022
Business of Fintech, Online Lenders

‘Change is hard for banks’: Behind Amount’s acquisition of Linear

  • Amount, a banking technology provider offering account opening, loan origination and BNPL financing solutions, is acquiring SMB loan and account origination platform Linear for $175 million.
  • The acquisition complements Amount’s consumer banking solutions with Linear’s technology for the commercial segment.
Iulia Ciutina | March 02, 2022
Business of Fintech, Finance Everywhere

‘The industry believes that poor credit scores are self–inflicted’: A new wave of fintechs is giving the underbanked access to credit

  • New fintechs are targeting underserved communities that don’t have credit histories, using new methodologies to help them build credit scores.
  • As more Millennials and Gen Zers navigate their financial journeys, their participation in the credit system could increasingly be aided by such fintechs.
Iulia Ciutina | January 26, 2022
Business of Fintech, Online Lenders

From one idea to 2 million applications: TomoCredit wants to change the credit score game

  • As an immigrant, TomoCredit founder and CEO Kristy Kim wanted to develop a solution to the problem of credit accessibility in the US.
  • At first she wanted to license an underwriting solution to big banks, but that would have taken too long - so she decided to launch a credit card company.
Iulia Ciutina | January 24, 2022
More Articles