How J.P. Morgan Payments eliminated 13 billion keystrokes a year by automating the paper behind payments

The payments industry likes to measure progress in milliseconds. Real-time rails, stablecoins, and instant settlement dominate the conversation. But for many businesses, the biggest source of friction is everything that surrounds the payment itself.

For J.P. Morgan Payments, that friction still arrives in envelopes.

In 2025 alone, the bank processed roughly 480 million checks and payment documents through its lockbox network. Behind every payment was a mix of invoices, remittance slips, handwritten notes, folded documents, staples, and countless formatting variations that traditionally required human intervention.

Before automation, processing that volume meant employees performed roughly 13 billion manual keystrokes every year.

Teaching AI to handle the messy middle

Rather than trying to eliminate checks that still account for about 25% to 26% of outgoing and incoming B2B payments in the U.S., J.P. Morgan Payments focused on eliminating the work they create.

The bank rebuilt its lockbox platform in 2020 with AI embedded into its core workflows. Once payment documents are scanned, computer vision and machine learning extract payment information, validate business rules, and review documents automatically. More recently, large language models have been added to support increasingly complex exception handling.

J.P. Morgan Payments’ tech systems can now process more than 4,000 envelope and document permutations, while the AI processing platform now achieves over 99.999% accuracy in document data extraction and business rule validation.

In 2025, the bank extended that automation into the physical world, deploying robotics at its lockbox facility that open envelopes, extract checks and invoices, unfold documents, organize paperwork, and prepare everything for AI processing.

“By investing in robotic and AI technology to improve our lockbox operations, we are automating the most labor-intensive tasks of the process, freeing our team to focus on more complex, higher-value decision-making,” said Michelle Conklin, Head of Receivables and Public Sector at J.P. Morgan Payments.

The robots were initially deployed at a single site for testing. Following a successful first deployment, they are being further refined and will return later this summer as part of the bank’s phased deployment approach.

Why this matters beyond paper

Checks remain a meaningful part of the U.S. payments ecosystem, particularly in B2B receivables. The real operational challenge is the manual work required to convert paper into usable financial data.

For treasury and finance teams, settlement is only one step in the process. Payments still need to be matched to invoices, reconciled against receivables, and reflected accurately in accounting systems before they become operationally useful.

“Moving dollars is only half the story,” according to Conklin. The other half is ensuring payment data is accurate and actionable the moment funds arrive, helping businesses reduce days sales outstanding (DSO), improve working capital, and accelerate reconciliation.

When payments become information problems

Checks have survived for so long because businesses built decades of workflows around them.

What’s changing now are the economics of processing. AI has reached a point where it can interpret thousands of document variations, extract meaning from unstructured data, and automate work that previously required human intervention.

Going forward, some of the biggest productivity gains across financial services may come from making legacy payment workflows machine-readable.

Read the deeper dive here.

The Week in Market Moves | July 2-9, 2026


Company signals and market response

This analysis tracks the top company developments and how markets absorbed them through Thursday’s close, focusing on where shifting narratives translate into price action.

It is part of Tearsheet PRO’s weekly 10-Q Newsletter, where strategy meets market reaction. I track how leading banks and fintechs are evolving in public markets and how investors are pricing those moves.

Subscribe to PRO and get the full 10-Q story every Friday!




1. Coinbase (COIN) – Close: $158.44

  • Coinbase secured U.K. regulatory approval to offer equities, derivatives, and perpetual futures alongside crypto products.
  • The move advances Coinbase’s ambition to become an “Everything Exchange,” combining traditional and digital asset investing under one platform.

Why it matters: Coinbase is steadily erasing the line between crypto exchanges and traditional brokerages. Rather than waiting for tokenized finance to fully emerge, the company is building a platform where conventional assets and blockchain-based products co-exist. The U.K. license gives Coinbase a regulated pathway to expand well beyond crypto, reinforcing a broader industry trend: the future competition may not be between banks and crypto firms, but between platforms that can offer every asset class through a single customer relationship.

2. U.S. Bank (USB) – Close: $61.90

  • U.S. Bank launched Enhanced Payments, giving small businesses a single digital interface to send same-day ACH, instant payments, and international wires without visiting a branch.
  • The bank has added higher transaction limits and payment guidance tools to help growing businesses choose the right payment rail for each transaction.

Why it matters: U.S. Bank is acknowledging that small businesses increasingly manage the same cross-border suppliers, cash flow complexity, and payment choices that were once reserved for larger enterprises. Rather than asking businesses to adopt another standalone payments platform, the bank is embedding sophisticated money movement directly into digital banking. The competitive battle is shifting from offering more payment rails to making those rails easier to navigate.

3. J.P. Morgan Chase (JPM) – Close: $335.47

  • JPM launched a dedicated Small-Cap Investment Banking business targeting companies valued between $100 million and $500 million.
  • It positioned the new team to work alongside commercial banking, private banking, and financing groups, extending J.P. Morgan’s existing relationships with growing businesses.

Why it matters: J.P. Morgan is moving further down the corporate ladder without changing its investment banking playbook. Many smaller businesses are approaching ownership transitions, attracting private equity interest or preparing for acquisitions, creating a growing pipeline of advisory work. By serving these companies earlier, J.P. Morgan increases its chances of keeping clients as they scale instead of losing them to boutique advisory firms. The strategy is as much about relationship expansion as it is about deal volume.

4. Block (XYZ) – Close: $77.42

  • Block agreed to pay $45 million to settle a multistate investigation into Cash App’s fraud protection and customer support practices.
  • The settlement requires stronger fraud controls, 24/7 live phone support, improved customer education, and compliance with reimbursement obligations for unauthorized transactions.

Why it matters: The financial penalty is significant, but the operational changes may matter even more. Regulators are making it clear that fintechs offering bank-like experiences are expected to deliver bank-like protections. As digital wallets become primary financial accounts for millions of consumers, fraud resolution and customer support are becoming competitive necessities rather than compliance checkboxes. The era of prioritizing growth over operational resilience continues to narrow.

5. Robinhood (HOOD) – Close: $115.11

  • Robinhood Chain’s earliest surge in activity came from memecoin trading, despite being designed primarily for tokenized real-world assets.
  • The rollout reinforces how retail speculation often becomes the first stress test for new blockchain infrastructure.

Why it matters: The story isn’t really about memecoins. It’s about how new financial infrastructure gains traction. Retail traders consistently become the first users willing to experiment with unfamiliar platforms, creating cash flow long before institutional use cases arrive. For Robinhood, the challenge now is whether infrastructure initially fueled by speculation can mature into a platform capable of supporting tokenized equities and broader financial products. The infrastructure – not the memes – will ultimately determine whether that transition succeeds.

What Robinhood’s June product blitz was really about


    Weekly 10-Q

    The weekly 10-Q newsletter is part of the Tearsheet Pro subscription, where I unpack the recent moves and strategies of leading banks and fintechs in the public space, coupled with stock market analysis. In your inbox every Friday!

    Message Sara


    What Robinhood’s June product blitz was really about

    The business Robinhood is becoming…


    Robinhood’s story has usually been told through the lens of trading. Every new product ultimately points back to one destination: getting people to buy and sell securities.

    June looked different, though. Within a matter of weeks, Robinhood became an IPO underwriter. It laid off roughly 10% of its workforce to accelerate product development. Days later, it unveiled Robinhood Chain, a blockchain purpose-built for tokenized real-world assets, alongside stock tokens, crypto lending, AI-powered trading accounts, and a broader international expansion.

    This string of announcements points to Robinhood systematically removing the boundaries between investing, banking, payments, capital formation, and blockchain infrastructure. The company is building a platform designed to own more of a customer’s financial life beyond just the moments when they trade.

    That evolution has been underway for years. Robinhood has steadily expanded beyond commission-free investing into retirement accounts, high-yield savings, credit products, wealth management, prediction markets, and family investing. Lending marked one phase of that transition. June’s announcements marked another milestone: building the infrastructure that connects those products into a unified financial ecosystem.

    Moving upstream in financial markets


    subscription wall for TS Pro

    The Week in Market Moves | June 18-25, 2026


    Company signals and market response

    This analysis tracks the top company developments and how markets absorbed them through Thursday’s close, focusing on where shifting narratives translate into price action.

    It is part of Tearsheet PRO’s weekly 10-Q Newsletter, where strategy meets market reaction. I track how leading banks and fintechs are evolving in public markets and how investors are pricing those moves.

    Subscribe to PRO and get the full 10-Q story every Friday!




    1. Green Dot (GDOT) – Close: $13.40

    • Green Dot shareholders approved the sale of Green Dot Bank, paving the way to split its regulated banking and fintech businesses.
    • The deal creates two focused companies: a publicly traded bank under CommerceOne and a privately owned fintech backed by Smith Ventures.

    Why it matters: The move reflects a growing belief that regulated banking and technology businesses no longer thrive under the same operating model. Banks are increasingly optimized for compliance, capital, and risk management, while fintechs compete on speed, software, and product innovation. Green Dot is acknowledging that each business may perform better when allowed to specialize rather than compromise.

    2. American Express (AXP) – Close: $342.46

    • American Express, Mercantile, and the American Bar Association launched a business credit card built specifically for solo lawyers and small law firms.
    • The partnership expands Amex’s push into profession-specific financial products instead of broad SMB offerings.

    Why it matters: Small businesses are becoming too diverse to serve with one-size-fits-all financial products. Rather than targeting SMBs as a single market, issuers are beginning to build around the economics of individual professions. Law firms have distinct cash-flow cycles, operating expenses, and financing needs, making verticalized financial products a more compelling competitive strategy than generic business cards.

    3. J.P. Morgan Chase (JPM) – Close: $335.12

    • J.P. Morgan promoted Doug Petno and Troy Rohrbaugh to co-presidents in its clearest succession move yet beneath CEO Jamie Dimon.
    • The appointments also place each executive in charge of one of the bank’s two largest operating divisions. Petno will become the CEO of the Commercial & Investment Bank (CIB), with Rohrbaugh taking the helm of the Consumer & Community Banking (CCB) business.

    Why it matters: Leadership succession has become a strategic asset for the world’s largest financial institutions. Rather than waiting for a CEO transition, J.P. Morgan is giving potential successors broader operational responsibility years in advance. It signals that institutional continuity is becoming part of a bank’s competitive advantage, particularly as scale makes leadership decisions increasingly consequential.

    4. Alphabet (Goog) – Close: $342.19

    • Google Finance introduced AI-powered portfolio management, investment research, and a dedicated Android app.
    • Users can now upload holdings, ask natural-language investment questions, and receive AI-generated market updates.

    Why it matters: Google is moving AI beyond answering financial questions into continuously monitoring a user’s portfolio. That shifts AI from an information layer to an ongoing financial companion that helps interpret markets, identify risks, and surface opportunities. As these tools become habitual, the interface where consumers check markets could increasingly become the place where financial decisions begin.

    5. NVIDIA (NVDA) – Close: $195.74

    • NVIDIA introduced an AI fraud detection blueprint that uses graph neural networks to uncover relationships between transactions, accounts, devices, and identities instead of evaluating payments in isolation.
    • The system is designed to detect coordinated fraud rings in real time, giving banks the ability to identify organized attacks before payments clear.

    Why it matters: The biggest shift in fraud is that banks are beginning to detect criminal networks rather than individual fraudulent transactions. As fraud grows more organized, transaction-by-transaction scoring leaves too many blind spots. Relationship-based AI changes the unit of analysis from the payment itself to the entire fraud ecosystem, enabling financial institutions to intervene earlier and make real-time fraud prevention more effective.

    PayPal is trimming the parts that don’t fit its new operating model


      Weekly 10-Q

      The weekly 10-Q newsletter is part of the Tearsheet Pro subscription, where I unpack the recent moves and strategies of leading banks and fintechs in the public space, coupled with stock market analysis. In your inbox every Friday!

      Message Sara


      PayPal is trimming the parts that don’t fit its new operating model

      PayPal is narrowing what counts as “core”.


      PayPal is weighing the shutdown of its venture arm, PayPal Ventures. Venture arms usually die for one reason: the parent company no longer believes it can afford ambiguity. And PayPal, right now, is choosing clarity over optionality.

      A company spokesperson said: “As part of our continued efforts to sharpen our focus, we are exploring strategic options for our corporate venture capital arm, PayPal Ventures.”

      “Exploring strategic options” is corporate language for something that is already structurally decided but not yet procedurally executed. According to multiple sources cited in reporting, the internal direction is more definitive than the phrasing suggests: shutdown or partial wind-down, with some positions potentially sold on the secondary market.

      Which brings us to the actual question: Why?

      Because PayPal is shrinking its perimeter of what counts as “core”

      To understand why a venture arm becomes expendable, we have to look at what the company is trying to become.


      subscription wall for TS Pro

      J.P. Morgan Payments’ Michael Lozanoff on why agentic commerce can’t scale without governance

      J.P. Morgan anticipates that success in agentic commerce will not come from the smartest AI agents, but from the institutions building the governance, permissioning, and trust infrastructure that supports them.

      When capability is no longer the bottleneck

      Michael Lozanoff, Global Head of Merchant Services at J.P. Morgan Payments, believes the capability question is largely being solved. “Capability without governance is the next challenge,” he notes.

      Agents today can already perform end-to-end commerce tasks: discover products, evaluate options, and complete checkout flows. What is still uncertain is whether those actions can be trusted at scale.

      A prompt like “reorder office supplies” can produce very different outcomes depending on how “usual” is interpreted, whether cost or availability is prioritized, or how incomplete instructions are resolved.

      “The agent may be perfectly capable of executing that,” Lozanoff says. “But what happens when the item is out of stock, and the agent prioritizes availability over cost? Or when it interprets ‘usual’ differently than the consumer intended? The intelligence was there. The governance wasn’t.”

      When the human disappears from the transaction

      Traditional payment systems were built on a simple premise: a human decides, a human authorizes, a human pays. Agent-driven transactions don’t behave that way. When an AI agent acts on behalf of a user, it disrupts fraud models, authentication logic, and the way risk is interpreted. 

      “The shift we’re building toward is moving risk signals away from consumer browsing toward authenticated agent identity and authorization context,” Lozanoff explains. “Is the agent known? Is it permitted to act? Is it operating within the policy it was given?”

      That means having a more continuous approach to risk that spans discovery, checkout, and post-transaction monitoring -– following the agent throughout the entire interaction.

      Merchants lose visibility

      On the merchant side, the challenge is different but equally fundamental: visibility.

      Retailers are used to understanding how customers arrive, their search patterns, browsing behavior, and checkout flows. Agentic commerce obscures much of that. Merchants are already raising concerns around fraud, liability, and intent verification. “They also want a clear way to verify that intent if something goes wrong,” Lozanoff notes.

      J.P. Morgan’s guidance is to start with the basics of data structure. If product data is not machine-readable, agents cannot reliably discover or compare it. Poor cataloging removes products from the decision surface.

      “Clean, rich product data is the foundation,” Lozanoff says. “Without it, agentic commerce doesn’t work for the merchant, regardless of how good the agent is.”

      The unresolved liability question

      The hardest problem sits at the intersection of intent and responsibility. If an agent follows instructions but produces an unwanted outcome, who is responsible?

      Merchant, bank, consumer, or agent provider? “There aren’t clean answers quite yet,” Lozanoff notes.

      J.P. Morgan’s view is that a stronger authorization context can reduce ambiguity with the support of granular customer consent, explicit limits, and merchant-defined constraints that make intent clearer before execution. 

      From intelligence to governance

      As AI becomes more accessible, intelligence stops being the key differentiator. What matters instead is governance: who the agents are, what they can access, and what they are permitted to do under enforceable rules.

      “A conversation the broader ecosystem needs to have is around the consistent set of industry standards that will shepherd responsible growth, such as clear ways for agents to identify themselves and transact safely, and common approaches to risk, data sharing, and liability,” Lozanoff says.

      What Klarna, Coinbase, and Chase are building next


        Weekly 10-Q

        The weekly 10-Q newsletter is part of the Tearsheet Pro subscription, where I unpack the recent moves and strategies of leading banks and fintechs in the public space, coupled with stock market analysis. In your inbox every Friday!

        Message Sara


        What Klarna, Coinbase, and Chase are building next

        Klarna, Coinbase, and Chase and the business of moving closer to the customer.


        This week saw Klarna move deeper into deposits, Coinbase using stablecoins to re-engineer credit access, and Chase building intelligence layers around small business decision-making. 

        These moves offer a snapshot of how financial firms are searching for growth beyond the boundaries that originally defined them.

        Klarna: Turning spending behavior into a deposit engine

        Klarna has launched a US high-yield savings account in its app. This is the next step in a longer shift of treating spending and saving as a single behavioral system.

        The accounts -– FDIC-insured through WebBank, with no minimums, no fees, and yields above 3% APY -– place Klarna directly inside the deposit economy. “The average American earns less than half a percent on their savings, not because better options don’t exist, but because their bank hasn’t had to compete,” said Sebastian Siemiatkowski, CEO and co-founder of Klarna.


        subscription wall for TS Pro

        The real power struggle in agentic commerce isn’t building the smartest AI agents; it’s governing them

        The financial services industry is obsessed with what AI agents can do. Can they search? Can they reason? Can they negotiate? Can they shop?

        The answers are arriving faster than anyone expected. Agents can already browse websites, compare products, fill carts, and increasingly complete transactions. Every few weeks, a new demo appears showing an AI assistant navigating the web with fewer clicks and more autonomy than before.

        But inside one of the world’s largest payments businesses, a new question has emerged. What happens after the agent becomes capable?

        Michael Lozanoff, Global Head of Merchant Services at J.P. Morgan Payments

        That is where Michael Lozanoff, Global Head of Merchant Services at J.P. Morgan Payments, believes the real work is happening. “The capability question is largely being solved,” he says. “Models are getting smarter, and the ability to browse and compare items is maturing. But capability without governance is the next challenge.”

        While much of Silicon Valley is racing to build smarter agents, J.P. Morgan Payments is addressing the trust, identity, and governance infrastructure needed to manage autonomous agents.


        Co-brand debit: The missing layer in modern loyalty

        Learn how forward-thinking brands are driving daily engagement and direct revenue far beyond booking cycles.

        Co-branded debit turns everyday spend into owned data, predictable interchange revenue, and deeper customer relationships, without relying on OTAs or seasonal bookings.

        We put together a playbook for leaders ready to close that gap.

        Inside, you’ll find:

        The revenue case: interchange income, lower OTA commission drag, and data-driven ancillary revenue

        Sector breakdowns: tailored strategies for travel, hospitality, and retail

        A six-step launch roadmap: built for teams evaluating whether to own, outsource, or run a hybrid model

        Download Now

        The Week in Market Moves | May 28-June 4, 2026


        Company signals and market response

        This analysis tracks the top company developments and how markets absorbed them through Thursday’s close, focusing on where shifting narratives translate into price action.

        It is part of Tearsheet PRO’s weekly 10-Q Newsletter, where strategy meets market reaction. I track how leading banks and fintechs are evolving in public markets and how investors are pricing those moves.

        Subscribe to PRO and get the full 10-Q story every Friday!




        1. Wise (WSE) – Close: $11.05

        • Wise is under investigation in Belgium over suspected AML lapses tied to cross-border flows totaling roughly €500M.
        • The probe follows earlier regulatory pressure in Europe and past remediation efforts across its AML and compliance systems.

        Why it matters: This goes to the core of what scaled cross-border fintech looks like under regulatory stress. As transaction volumes grow and geographies expand, the AML surface area expands with it.

        For Wise, the issue is less about whether it has controls in place and more about whether those controls can keep pace with increasingly fragmented enforcement regimes across jurisdictions.

        It also underscores a broader reality for cross-border players: speed and scale are only as durable as the compliance architecture underneath them.

        2. SoFi (SOFI) – Close: $16.92

        • SoFi introduced an AI-powered financial coach that aggregates data across over 12,000 institutions to provide personalized guidance.
        • Early testing shows 70% of engaged users took financial actions such as debt repayment or account optimization.

        Why it matters: This move pushes SoFi beyond being a multi-product financial app into a decision-making layer across a user’s entire financial life. The key shift is scope.

        By pulling in external financial data, SoFi is effectively positioning itself as the interpretive layer over fragmented financial behavior. That creates a stronger feedback loop between insight, recommendation, and action than product bundling alone ever could.

        3. Affirm (AFRM) – Close: $68.57

        • Affirm and Stripe expanded their partnership to bring BNPL capabilities to UK merchants using Stripe.
        • The collaboration also includes joint work on AI-powered commerce and tokenized, pay-over-time checkout experiences.

        Why it matters: This move is about checkout becoming a programmable decision layer. Payments are becoming adaptive financial choices embedded in commerce flows.

        Stripe continues to position itself as the orchestration layer for merchant payments, while Affirm plugs into that layer at the point of consumer decision.

        4. LendingClub (LC) – Close: $17.28

        • LendingClub is shifting its listing to Nasdaq alongside a rebrand to “Happen Bank” as it evolves into a broader digital-first bank.
        • The company is repositioning beyond lending into deposits, marketplace finance, and a more diversified banking model.

        Why it matters: The rebrand reflects LendingClub’s structural identity shift from product company to full-stack financial institution.

        Moving to Nasdaq aligns with its repositioning toward a more tech-forward narrative, but the real change is architectural. LendingClub is effectively trying to escape its original constraint as a lender and reframe itself as a system for financial activity rather than a single product.

        5. Bank of America (BAC) – Close: $54.07

        • Bank of America is launching a real-time cross-border payments solution integrated with SWIFT and its CashPro platform.
        • The system connects multiple global instant payment networks, including UPI, Faster Payments, and SPEI.

        Why it matters: This is a traditional bank directly responding to the real-time expectations set by fintech and payment networks. The move is about compressing settlement latency across jurisdictions while maintaining institutional control.

        The key shift is interoperability, connecting fragmented domestic instant payment systems into a unified corporate experience layer.