PayPal-TIO deal could increase Venmo revenue, utility

PayPal’s merger strategy has long been focused on digital offerings. Reaching the physical world, however, has been a real challenge for the payments giant.

Now PayPal is trying to change that. The recently announced acquisition of Canadian bill pay service TIO Networks for $233 million would not just give them greater reach but a greater opportunity to work more with people who are excluded from the banking system.

“It’s been clear for a while that PayPal has a vision to democratize financial services,” said Anuj Nayar, head of global initiatives at PayPal. “A lot of this stuff we’re doing specifically to hit the underserved. People are being disenfranchised … it’s incredible how high a proportion of the U.S. population couldn’t raise $400 in an emergency.”

About 15 percent of U.S. consumers don’t have a bank account, according to Pew Charitable Trusts. For many of them, digital financial services seem ill-suited to their needs since they deal mostly in paper checks or cash. And while targeting people off the financial grid is laudable, the deal, which is scheduled to close in the second half of 2017, is as much about the transaction volumes PayPal would acquire, if not more, as servicing the unbanked.

When the company announced its quarterly earnings at the end of January it highlighted the successful growth of PayPal-owned Venmo, which processed $5.6 billion over the quarter, up 126 percent from the previous quarter. But Venmo transfers are free for users and PayPal doesn’t make much from them. Similarly, people making cash payments to billers are probably doing so through a kiosk or 7Eleven, Family Dollar or other retailer, said Michael Moeser, Javelin Strategy & Research’s director of payments.

“PayPal makes [revenue] when you use its wallet at a merchant,” he said. So by bringing billers into its network PayPal argues that it’s creating more opportunities to generate fee revenue.

If PayPal can get data on people who are outside the mainstream financial system, and as a result, aren’t on the radars of credit bureaus, it could potentially help build and maintain records of the volumes of data that show people’s financial integrity and responsibility, said Ramesh Siromani, a partner in the financial institutions practice of A.T. Kearney, a global strategy and management consulting firm.

As important as it is to bring attention to and target these customers, this deal, for PayPal, is still all about adding more ways to get volume into its business that wasn’t previously there. TIO processed $7 billion in bill payments in 2016. It boasts 14 million customers, 10,000 biller partners and 65,000 retail locations.

In the long term, PayPal could use the TIO network to bring more utility to the Venmo app, Moeser suggested. PayPal declined to comment.

“Say you and your three roommates get a collective utility bill, and one person is getting the funds from the other roommates so he or she can pay that utility bill,” he said. “When you get money from your roommates you don’t have to go to a separate function or log into your mobile or online banking, you could do it all from your Venmo wallet and there’s an opportunity for Venmo to get some sort of interchange [fee] from that biller.”

Nayar did not comment on the company’s future plans beyond the deal, which has still not been completed. For now, he said, PayPal is focused on serving customer needs, and finding a way to bring people with limited financial access into its business and into the mainstream financial system is on deck.

“Across the board we’re focusing on needs of customers,” Nayar said. “PayPal’s are two fold: merchants and consumers. For both of them there is a massive unmet need and PayPal is sort of the only global third party payments network that does it all at scale — we have three digital wallets in total,” he added, referring to the PayPal digital wallet, Venmo and Xoom.

For the last five to 10 years, the conversation around financial inclusion has drawn attention to the exorbitant fees people end up paying just to cash a check or send money to family in a different country. In that time, technology developers have built software that allows them to perform these basic functions for little to no fee, and more quickly.

Adopting these technologies aren’t as easy as it sounds though, said David Sica, a principal at venture capital firm Nyca partners. There’s a huge financial literacy component that could be addressed through great marketing and product design.

“What often gets missed is the consumers trust that check casher, they trust the service that for the last 20 times they’ve used it does what it’s supposed to do,” he said. “If I’m a check cashing customer, I’m not going to rock the boat. I’m going to go where I know I can cash the check and remit and I’m fine paying the fees because it’s more important to get it done. It’s unrealistic to think the unbanked, underserved population will start acting and behaving like a Venmo customer on day one.”

Why retailers struggle to adopt mobile payments

While big banks and tech giants are selling the idea of faster, safer retail transactions, retailers have a harder time getting on board.

In the past three years, Apple, Samsung and Google all launched mobile wallets. In November, JPMorgan Chase and Citibank launched their Chase Pay and Citi Pay programs. In theory, there are tools retailers can easily implement, but they’ve hit the breaks for three reasons: Legacy retail giants are still focused more on cutting costs than improving the customer experience; overhauling hardware and software is enormously complex; and consumers need more incentives to use mobile payments on a daily basis.

“Before you worry about integration, you’ve got to have a business strategy that appreciates innovation and makes it a priority,” said David Sica, a principal at Nyca Partners, a fintech venture capital firm. “Once you have a plan for what you’re going to do at X retailer, then the integration is certainly doable, but you’ve got to put resources and people behind it, and it’s going to cost money.”

One reason retailers haven’t responded as quickly is that consumer demand for such services has been low. Most consumers don’t see why they should change their habits at checkout even though mobile payments are said to be more secure. When they do, mobile payments will start to gain adoption by retailers, said Morgan McAlenney, evp of The Integer Group’s digital arm.

But Margaret Weichert, a principal in EY’s banking practice and the Americas lead for payments, argued that point-of-sale for large retailers in particular is extremely complex. Adopting mobile payments affects related services like loyalty schemes, offers and promotions, advertising and data analytics.

POS systems are also typically tied to systems for managing inventory, resource planning, core payments capabilities and treasury solutions.

For now, customers largely use their smartphones to research purchases rather than buy, McAlenney said. Merchants have the levers to change that behavior if they realize their business is about an experience and not just transactions, she said.

Take Starbucks. The payments industry has looked to the cafe chain since it built its own payment system in 2011 that was designed to be easy to use and rewarded perks for loyalty. But Starbucks is an outlier.

Like Starbucks, Walmart, CVS, Tesco and Carrefour also built their own systems. Other retailers will partner with Apple, Samsung and Android, which already have big consumer bases with access to their pay products through their smart phones. It’s unclear which way the banks will go, given the constant changes in technology.

“Retailers may be looking into the future as opposed to implementing for today,” McAlenney said. “A lot of these technologies of the last few years are transition technologies — from QR codes to digital coupons — a lot of these things are transitioning us to a future state we haven’t yet defined.”

Case in point: Beyond mobile pay, retailers have another big trend to figure out, invisible payments, like voice ordering that Starbucks introduced to let people order ahead. Google Voice and Amazon Echo and Dot are likely to make voice payments more prolific and possibly give rise to scenario where people can order different products from different retailers in a single breath.

“Now seems like a very opportune time for retailers to respond, and they need to do so by providing real innovation for their customers, not by optimizing cost for acceptance,” Sica said.

Hi 5! The top five fintech stories we’re following today

top 5 weekly fintech stories

Customers dig the new Bank of Hawaii branch design

You’d think a bank branch of tomorrow would be focused on all sorts of futuristic fintech. Bank of Hawaii’s new branches keep customers firmly in the center. With little visible tech, tellers also make their way out of hiding.

U.S. Bank’s approach to social intelligence

U.S. Bank has created a continuous marketing feedback loop. Whether it’s stadium sponsorships like the bank did with the Minnesota Vikings or an awareness campaign on Twitter, the firm turns big data into actionable insights to be used across the organization.

Inside MassMutual’s fintech startup, Haven Life

U.S. insurers, many of whom are over 100 years old, are trying to figure this whole innovation thing out. MassMutual has developed a couple of new online brands, including an in-house startup. Tradestreaming talks with Haven Life’s CEO about the future of insurtech.

Are there real world blockchain applications yet?

Blockchain technology is still too immature to go to market for many use cases. In this week’s podcast, ACI’s head of digital banking solutions names a few areas he sees more ready for primetime.

Mobile payments year in review

It’s been an up and down year for mobile payments. Consortia were formed and disbanded, former enemies came together, and mobile wallets at the POS are still stuck in neutral. Here are the best and worst moments for mobile payments during 2016.

2016 mobile payments year in review

It’s been an up and down year for mobile payments. Mobile commerce continued to grow, while mobile POS sales plateaued. Consortia were formed and disbanded, and former enemies made nice and came together on new partnerships. P2P payments gained traction and developing companies released mobile payment apps.

All that plus ANT Financial taking over the world in the mobile payments year in review.

2016: The year mobile POS didn’t happen

When 2016 rolled around, people were looking for an nice bump in mobile wallet transactions at the POS. Those hopes were quashed when Accenture released a report that mobile wallet POS transactions had seen zero percent growth in 2016.

Black Friday telling of the gap between mobile payments and mobile commerce

We’ve written a lot about how mobile POS payments and commerce originating from a mobile phone are two separate things. When grouped together, reports make it seem like mobile POS payments are taking over.

2016’s Black Friday showed us how different mobile payments and mobile commerce are right now. Adobe estimated that shoppers made $1.2 billion in purchases from mobile devices on Black Friday. On the other hand, reports from payment processor Cayan revealed only 0.6% of all POS transactions of Black Friday were made using a mobile wallet.

AliPay

ANT Financial’s payment arm continues to grow. AliPay is now looking to service Chinese tourists all over the world, including payment capabilities at international duty free shops.

EMV transition happening slowly

Merchants have been slow to respond to new regulations requiring them to use EMV and chip technology for in-store transactions. Fintech companies like Square and CardFlight have created cheap and versatile solutions for merchants, but the process of moving over to new hardware has been arduous.

MCX goes down

The Merchant Consumer Exchange was some of the biggest U.S. retailers’ answer to high interchange fees. Merchants tried to circumvent credit card fees and third party mobile wallets like Apple Pay by creating a single mobile wallet that worked at various retailers.

Unfortunately for merchants, things didn’t work out  Some would argue that the MCX and its mobile payment app CurrentC was doomed from the start. Trying to have a single app cater to multiple conglomerates in various sectors is a near impossible task. There are those who feel the whole matter was a stunt to try and combat merchant exchange fees from credit card companies, but regardless, the app still hasn’t been released and is seen as a big flop. Walmart, CVS, and Kohls are only a few of the companies that left the MCX to create their own mobile apps.

PayPal, MasterCard, Visa ménage à trois

Paypal had been on credit card companies’ naughty list because of its practice of pushing users to fund accounts via ACH versus using a credit card. But the three payment powerhouses kissed and made up earlier this year. The new partnership gives PayPal a leg into POS transactions with new integrations into MasterPass and Visa Checkout. In exchange, PayPal agreed to not discourage customers to fund their accounts with credit cards. I guess they forgot that Visa’s CEO at the time Charles Scharf called PayPal a “foe”, pledging to go after them “in ways that people have never seen before”.

Venmo grows, but sees increased competition

Venmo continued to grow this year, as more millennials signed up for the p2p payment provider. After seeing 25 percent growth from Q1 to Q2 of 2016, some predicted that Venmo will soon be the bigger than any P2P payment service, banks included. But P2P payment growth means more competition. In November, Facebook launched a P2P payments feature in Messenger. With the amount of users that Facebook already has, the social media platform may be a daunting opponent for P2P payment providers.

Early Warning

Speaking of P2P payments, Early Warning has been aggressively pushing its p2p payment system to banks. Rebranded as Zelle at Money 20/20, the app is the incumbents’ answer to Venmo. Although monetization does look better at Zelle, the company still needs the buzz and higher customer acquisition numbers to truly compete with Venmo and Facebook.

Mobile wallet war: Apple vs Samsung vs Android

Though mobile wallet transactions at the POS haven’t grown, that doesn’t mean companies haven’t started jostling for position and market share. The big three of mobile wallets have been vying for early adopters, trying to position themselves for the day in the (not so near) future that mobile payments take off. Apple moved to mobile commerce to help assuage users, while malfunctioning Samsung phones put a damper on its market share and hopes.

India and developing countries emerging

India has emerged as a hotbed for mobile payments, with powerhouse Paytm at the lead. South American and African countries have also seen mobile payment growth as cheaper technology goes global.

Starbucks revamps rewards system

It’s pretty tough to find a more successful mobile payment app than the Starbucks app. But the coffee company went against common sense and fixed something that wasn’t broke, altering the rewards system. Although there was a huge backlash from consumers, people are still fans, loading $1.2 billion onto the Starbucks mobile app and cards, which is more than many banks have in deposits.

Overall, there were some highs and lows this year for mobile payments. Though POS mobile transactions haven’t done well, mobile commerce is on fire entering into 2017. It doesn’t seem like any leaps will be made in mobile payments in the next 12 months, but look for continued momentum for mobile commerce, more P2P payment companies, and a global push to move transactions onto mobile devices.

Apple Pay jumps into ecommerce

Not seeing much growth in mobile payment POS transactions, Apple Pay has opened up a new channel for its mobile wallet: ecommerce.

It’s part of a bigger strategy Apple’s been implementing since the middle of September. Already established at the POS, Apple is now working on tightening up its presence in browsers and mobile commerce. Apple Pay for websites was launched with the iOS 10 for iPhone and iPad release and into Safari with the recent OS Sierra update.

This allows iPhone, iPad and Mac users to quickly checkout at ecommerce websites by selecting Apple Pay, eliminating the need to create a new account or log in to a website, expediting the payment process. The new Mac Book Pro even has touch payment authorization and payments built into the Touch ID pad.

And today, Apple announced special holiday offers for Apple Pay users shopping online.

apple-pay_-_apple

Mobile and ecommerce is way ahead of mobile payments on the adoption curve. Getting users familiar with Apple Pay in existing ecommerce behavior can pave the way for future mobile commerce and POS adoption.

It seems that the road to mobile payments runs through getting people comfortable with using wallets in mobile commerce. Google has made a similar move with Payments Autofill in Chrome, so it seems the mobile wallet war is moving online. At the same time, because it lacks a web browser, Samsung may be left to clean up its exploding phones.

Why CardFlight chose to build its technology on top of old systems

Fintech innovators have had to straddle the line between old and new, and mobile payments are no different. In the 2016 Mobile Payments Study, Accenture points to outdated hardware as a reason why mobile payments haven’t taken off. Providing updated POS hardware is only half the battle, though.

The technology powering many of the U.S. payment networks is older than yours truly. So fintech companies are challenged to come up with solutions that provide new hardware and can communicate with older networks.

“The way to mess up the future of mobile payments is by not respecting and building around the incumbents,” said Derek Webster, CEO of CardFlight. “Our view of the world is that Visa and MasterCard are going to be stronger companies 10 to 20 years from now and global payments providers are going continue to play a role for years from now. We’re trying to build on top of them.”

CardFlight has built with incumbents in mind, both in terms of hardware and software. The company specializes in BYOD, or bring your own device, turning an average smart device into a mobile POS.

On the software side, the company offers two solutions, each for a different customer type. There’s the Cardflight SDK for developers that can be connected into an app. For the less tech savvy looking for a simple way to process payments on the go, there’s a turnkey solution called SwipeSimple.

On the hardware side, CardFlight’s most popular product is a dongle that plugs into a device’s audio jack. Webster embraces the notion of catering to the payments environment. NFC payments like Apple Pay may be the future, but for now, catering to cards is where the volume is.

“Startups need to go to where the market is and will be in a year. The last thing we want to do is have a technology that doesn’t have a market. Hundreds of millions of consumers are carrying around credit cards. There are some advantages to innovating in that ecosystem rather than trying to build our own,” he said.

That’s not to say CardFlight doesn’t have its eye on the future. A new NFC reader and Bluetooth connected devices were been released in the past two months. A new deal connecting SwipeSimple to Security Card Services merchants was just signed. And an hour after the Apple iPhone 7 was announced, CardFlight had a press release up about compatible hardware.

As CEO of one of the first approved payment providers for EMV technology, Webster found himself at the center of the EMV launch, earning a trip up to DC.

“We were proud to be certified and approved before the liability shift. On October 1, I was on Capitol Hill because the industry trade association invited me to do a session on EMV. Someone even held up one of our card readers in front of Congress testifying that there are EMV solutions right now,” he stated.

CardFlight has gotten good press for its early EMV approval and up-to-date products, but there’s still a long road ahead. CardFlight doesn’t release revenue numbers, so it’s unclear how it matches up to BYOD bigwigs like Square. Customers also need to get more comfortable with swiping on a merchant’s smart phone, which may seem sketchy to the average Joe.

Merchants can’t change how a consumer pays for something. That will just end with a pissed off customer. But companies like CardFlight can give retailers the tools to cater to as many people as possible.

Shocking news: Mobile payments aren’t growing

At this years Money 20/20 conference, Accenture presented its 2016 North America Digital Payments survey. The annual report used data from 4000 consumers in North America, tracking how they pay.

The report discusses how payments are becoming mainstream, which players are setting themselves up to be industry leaders, and the future of digital payments.

“Making payments is part of consumers’ everyday lives,” the author writes. “Before long, making digital payments will be too. Because after years of steady momentum, digital payments is on the verge of becoming mainstream—and there’s no turning back.”

But at the end of a section discussing the momentum of digital payments, Accenture threw in a tiny finding:

“Even so, the use of mobile payments at the point of sale, which represents a significant portion of transaction volumes, is limited. Just 19 percent of consumers pay in store with their phones like last year.”

Read that line again: “Just 19 percent of consumers pay in store with their phones like last year.” For those lacking a degree in awkward language translation, here is a visual representation of the sentence:

accenture

Read that again: Zero percent growth in mobile payments at POS.

Not one or half a point. Zero. Sin crecimiento. Nada. Zilch.

We’ve come across a few reports recently touting the growth of mobile payments, so what gives?. The problem lies in the epidemic plaguing mobile payment surveys. Most reports easily mix up mobile payments with mobile commerce. In this context, a mobile payment is a customer using a mobile payment device for a POS transaction. Mobile commerce is when a customer buys something on a mobile phone. The small difference in language doesn’t seem like much, but leads to two very different data sets.

That’s why Visa showed mobile payments soaring from 18 percent to 54 percent in a recent study. Vocalink’s newest report on millennials states up front that it considers mobile payments to be “any payment made from or via a mobile phone,” aka mobile commerce. How many people chose to buy Amazon and iTunes products from their mobile phones instead of computers doesn’t give the full picture of mobile payment growth.

The data may be new,  but the reasons Accenture gave for the lack of mobile payment growth sound eerily familiar.

“Those who have yet to (37 percent) point to a simple reason why. Cash and plastic cards meet their needs. The reality too is that merchants have been slow to invest in modern card readers. Even if people want to pay by smartphone, they often cannot.”

Consumer behavior and a lack of hardware you say? Hmmm. Wait, isn’t that what we’ve been saying all along? In case you don’t believe me, look here here and here.

We still agree with Accenture that mobile payments are the future, but aren’t sure when the future exactly is. Accenture uses 2020 as a rough estimate for mobile payments becoming a majority payment option, which isn’t that crazy. At the same time, it takes a long time to move from 19 to 50 percent when your growth is at zero.

Retailers moving to more advanced hardware will help growth. And over time, consumers will get more comfortable with mobile wallets. But let’s just remember that cards are the 800 pound gorilla of mobile payments and aren’t going away any time soon.

Calling BS on Visa’s mobile payment numbers

Visa published a report claiming the use of mobile payments has surged in the last year. Tripled to be exact. This looks almost too good to be true, and when you read further down the article, it certainly is.

According to the Visa study, the number of Europeans regularly using a mobile device for payments has soared since 2015 from 18 percent to 54 percent.

The study looks comprehensive, polling over 36,000 online consumers in 19 European countries. Such a huge jump is a big red flag that there is some fundamental problem in the study. The questions and methodology were not released in detail.

Another red flag with the numbers in the study is the accompanying press release that claims 86 percent of users in Israel are mobile payments users. A quick survey of a very digitally savvy co-working space in Israel showed totally opposite results. Most people answered with “no.” Some added a caveat, “Wait, is a car hailing app considered mobile payments?” or “I used digital payments in the US — I wish I could use it here.”

Perhaps downloading an app from the app store is considered using mobile payments for the sake of this study?

It is also not clear what the 100 percent here is? Is it all the people who bank? Maybe it is all the people with smartphones or all the people who have a payment app on their smartphone? How is a mobile payment user even defined? 

Luckily, other studies shed a bit more light on the adoption of mobile payments, or lack thereof.

According to 2015 data from Trustev, only 20.7 percent of iPhone users and only 14 percent of Android/Samsung users have ever used Apple, Android, or Samsung Pay. Of the users who have used these mobile wallets, a vast majority only use them once a week. 38% of users with an Android Pay or Samsung Pay app have never even used it. This is a far cry from Visa’s 54 percent mobile payments claim. 

It seems Visa uses “mobile payments” to mean “mobile commerce”. As this paragraph from the press release explains, “In the UK, over two-fifths (43 percent) purchase high-value items such as holidays and electronics on a mobile device as well as regular transactions such as paying household bills.”

Even if we take Visa’s numbers to mean mobile commerce, the picture is not that rosy. According to the World Payments Report from Capgemini and BNP Paribas, while digital payments are increasing, cards still remain the fastest-growing digital payment method since 2010, holding at 11.8 percent. Digital payments only hit a 10 percent growth rate last year, accounting for 426.3 billion transactions.

In 2013, mobile payments and mobile commerce combined, which seems to be what Visa was actually measuring, were only 4 percent of of all debit or credit card transactions that year. Even if you apply the 2015 10 percent growth rate to 2013 figures, volumes are still pretty low.   

Let me be clear, Visa: paying my gas bill on an app is not mobile payments, nor is using Travelocity.  

It was good clickbait. Chapeau.

P.S. Fintech seems to have a semantics problem, with companies saying one thing while meaning another. Earlier it happened with Lemonade and its misuse of P2P. 

 

Paypal adds another mobile wallet to its arsenal

PayPal is bringing mobile payments to Europe with its newest partnership.

The eBay spinoff just announced an agreement that connects PayPal to telecom giant Vodafone’s Wallet app, including capabilities to make contactless payments at over 400,000 retailers in Europe via PayPal.

“Money is going digital, and the smartphone is at the center of this transformation.” said Rob Harper, director of mobile commerce, PayPal UK. “Mobile payments have long been at the heart of what we do. As mobile technology continues to evolve, we will continue to look at new ways to make it easier and faster for our customers to pay.”

The alliance marks the third agreement PayPal has made with a mobile wallet in the past four months. Visa and PayPal got over their beef and agreed to bring PayPal to Visa Checkout in July. PayPal then cut a deal with MasterCard, opening up MC tokenization to PayPal customers.

Now that PayPal has agreements with the two biggest credit cards and a European telecom company, look for more agreements with mobile wallets. But perhaps a Venmo integration to help solve the lingering monitization question is on the horizon.

Top 5 mobile parking payment apps

top parking payment apps

One of the worst feelings in the world is walking down the street and seeing a meter maid papering tickets on the block where you parked. On the same level is showing up 30 minutes early to the most important meeting of your life, and ending up late because you couldn’t find parking. Fortunately, mobile parking payment apps have helped the masses avoid the stress of failing to put an extra quarter in the meter and ending up with a citation, all the while ensuring you’re on time for that life-changing meeting.

But fintech companies aren’t getting involved just to provide consumers a convenience — the parking market is worth $25 billion in the U.S. alone. There are currently 40,000 garages and surface parking lots in the U.S., providing parking payment platforms a plethora of partners to work with. With more cars on the road and increased demand for parking spaces, it’s not surprising that parking apps are competing over the market.

Here, in no particular order, are the top 5 mobile parking payment apps:

Pango

Founded in 2005, Pango is the granddaddy of mobile parking payments. In an early version of the app, people who wanted to plug a local meter accessed Pango through an automated phone system. Eventually, Pango expanded to app form, allowing users to pay for parking at participating locations. Pango’s bread and butter is providing mobile payments for on-street parking, eliminating the need to feed meters with change, and allowing users to extend their parking time through the mobile app. Recently, Pango has formed some strategic partnerships to provide its users with access to municipal lots, fuel services, and car washes.

Pango reports having 700,000 users, and is available across Israel, and select U.S. cities. For a blast from the past, users can still call and pay for parking through their phones.

SpotHero

Focusing on off-street parking, the Chicago-based SpotHero enables users to reserve parking spaces in participating garages. With both hourly and monthly parking options, customers can lock-in discounted parking rates through their home computers or mobile phones. The app also comes with a navigation tool, giving customers mapping assistance to find their reserved lot easily. SpotHero monetizes their operation by charging a commission on all parking transactions.

SpotHero was founded in 2011 by Lawrence Kiss, Mark Lawrence, and Jeremy Smith, and is available in 12 major US cities, including NYC, San Francisco, and Chicago.

Parking Panda

Another off-street parking service, Parking Panda is one of the most sprawling North American parking apps. Currently available in 39 major cities and 30 airports, Parking Panda allows users to search, book, and pay for parking through its website or app. Users can use their current location or select a specific location to find parking. Parking Panda has inked partnerships with lots, garages, airports and arenas, and also unveiled an in-dash integration for IoT cars at the 2016 Mobile World Congress.

Parking Panda was founded in 2011 by Nick Miller and Adam Zilberbaum.

Parkmobile

Focused more on the number of cities than the number of locations in cities it services, Parkmobile is one of the vastest parking apps in the world. Using the ParkNow reservations platform, Parkmobile offers services in 600 international cities and reports having 11 million global users. In 2015, BMW announced a partnership with Parkmobile to bring parking payments into BMW dashboards. The previous year, Parkmobile reported $37 million in US sales.

Founded by Albert Bogaard in 2008, Parkmobile is part of the BCD group, a travel services conglomerate that reported $25.6 billion in global sales.

Passport

A B2C and B2B service, Passport works with cities to provide municipal-level, mobile parking solutions. Users can book a variety of municipal services through the Passport mobile app, including: making street-parking payments, acquiring parking permits, purchasing bus and train passes, and paying off parking citations. For cities, municipal workers can monitor data in real time and make sure nothing out of the ordinary is happening.

Founded in 2010 in Charlotte, NC, Passport just finished a funding round in May, raising $8 million. MK Capital led the round, and featured by Grotech Ventures and Relevance Capital.