Business of Fintech

Computers vs. Humans: Who wins the investment game?

close

Email a Friend

Computers vs. Humans: Who wins the investment game?

We’ve entered an era in investing where we read daily about billionaire stock pickers who’ve built large fortunes off their uncanny ability to invest in winners. There’s an entire cottage industry of websites that track all the investment moves of large fund managers in the hope for gleaning the next big homerun investment. Books like John Reese’s Guru Investor have deconstructed the strategies these top investors use so that investors at home can play along.

Here’s Estimize’s founder, Leigh Drogen on the humanness of great investing:

But here’s where it gets interesting. The best humans are still leaps and bounds better at investing than the best computers and the quantitative analysts behind their algorithms. Why? Because we’re just starting to scratch the surface of artificial intelligence in investing, and algorithms are still relatively dumb and inflexible. The best humans are still incredible at pattern matching and adjusting when correlations fall apart. Call it intuition, call it whatever you want, humans still have something extra that computers don’t (for now).

There is still something innately human about being able to identify and manage a great investment. No matter how good computers are at this point, they can’t recreate that special something.

On the other hand, much of today’s investing is happening via algorithms, via machines programmed to do what humans can’t — stick to an investment strategy. Trading volume in certain markets, like government bonds, is estimated to be 90% comprised of algorithms. That means buying and selling is happening machine-to-machine.

Machines can do something that behavioral finance experts know that humans just aren’t built to do: turn off their emotions and stick to a strategy. Algorithmic platforms enable quick filtering of investment candidates against standardized investment criteria and removes extraneous pressures and can make quantitative sense of conflicting signals.

So, which is it? Experts tend to say it’s a little bit of both. It’s the confluence of machines and humans that makes for the best, most successful investing. It’s the computer-enabled research and strategy building that enables a human, in spite of all his or her biases, to pull the trigger, when and where he or she determines is most appropriate.

According to Matthew Klein, the founder and CEO of Collective2, a platform for humans to devise, test, and manage algorithmic trading strategies, new investors should stick to the type of investing that plays to our strengths:

So if I were asked to give advice to some young hot-shot kid MBA at Harvard wondering what kind of investing field to pursue, I would say: Focus on the stuff that requires physical carbon. Do stuff that requires that you stand up at a podium and deliver a speech. Be a short-seller like Andrew Left who can scare the bejeesus out of investors by emailing a really cheesy PDF file to people in your rolodex.

To explore this concept further, Tradestreaming recently invited machine-human investing experts Matthew Klein, CEO of Collective2 and Leigh Drogen, CEO of Estimize to a frank conversation on the relative merits of algorithmic investing and stock picking.

View Can A Computer Do It Better? on Dealbreaker.

0 comments on “Computers vs. Humans: Who wins the investment game?”

Business of Fintech, Culture and Talent, Designing new products, Financial Education, Keys to growth

You, me, and the money: How ex-Stripe Emily Luk built a financial management app for couples, Plenty

  • Ex-Stripe Emily Luk created Plenty to help couples manage finances together, and the firm has recently seen 8x growth in users.
  • When building Plenty Luk prioritized right talent, adapted the firm's business model to cater to its consumer demands, and is helping couples address emotional money topics through the firm's blog, newsletter, and podcast.
Rabab Ahsan | March 04, 2025
Banking, Business of Fintech, Creating win-win partnerships, Partner, Podcasts

“We want this to be a long term relationship, minimum 5-10 years”: Citi’s Chafic Haddad on how the bank chooses fintech clients and builds evolving partnerships

  • Citi's Global Head of Fintech Sales Chafic Haddad, shares insights on the bank's fintech strategy, revealing how the bank prioritizes partnering for the long term.
  • He shares how Citi enables fintechs to expand beyond home markets, plays the role of both provider and co-creator, and leverages its network across 90+ countries.
Zack Miller | February 26, 2025
Banking, Banking as a service, Business of Fintech, Creating win-win partnerships

What BaaS companies learned the hard way in 2024 — and what’s coming next

  • The BaaS landscape has been turbulent for sometime, in today's story we recap at the major hurdles like regulations and narrowing partner bank network in 2024.
  • We will also take a look at how these challenges were solved by partner banks and fintechs and what strategies and trends may emerge in the industry in the new year.
Rabab Ahsan | February 11, 2025
Banking as a service, Business of Fintech, Embedded Finance, Keys to growth

Looking back and moving forward: How fintechs will beat back the dark clouds of 2024, capitalize on trends like AI, and build resilient firms in 2025

  • Last year was full of uncertainty for the fintech sector. VC winter did not ebb and at the same time regulators closed the parameter around sectors like BaaS, making these firms hyper-focused on compliance.
  • In this new year we look at how fintechs fared in 2024 and explore what shifts we can expect from these companies in this new year. 
Rabab Ahsan | January 21, 2025
Artificial Intelligence, Business of Fintech, Designing new products, Innovation

Looking back and moving forward: 2025 trends for Open Banking and Gen AI

  • Dive into how Open Banking and Gen AI impacted the industry in 2024 and how we think adoption is going to fare in 2025.
  • Adoption for both Open Banking and Gen AI is gaining momentum. Open Banking is spurred on by rulemaking and Gen AI is still riding the hype cycle.
Rabab Ahsan | January 07, 2025
More Articles