Artificial Intelligence

Are robots the answer to DoL rule challenges? Maybe, maybe not.

  • Roboadvisors offer a way forward for advisors to service smaller accounts.
  • But, experts question whether robo advice can be considered fiduciary.
close

Email a Friend

Are robots the answer to DoL rule challenges? Maybe, maybe not.

The U.S. retirement income industry is a complex beast with income derived from many sources, like Social Security, traditional pensions, 401(k)s, and Individual Retirement Accounts.

Managing an IRA can be a hard task for individuals, as they involve many possible products. This leads people to seek professional advice. With commission-based compensation and complex fees, conflicts of interest are commonplace.

A report by the The Council of Economic Advisers estimated that the annual cost of conflicted advice is about $17 billion each year, with $1.7 trillion of IRA assets invested in products with conflicts of interest.

It is on this backdrop that the DoL released a new set of rules requiring anyone providing investment advice to retirement plans to do so under fiduciary requirements to be prudent and avoid conflict of interest. The industry is now scrambling to change products, workflows and fee structures to comply with the new rules before the effective date of April 10, 2017.

With compliance costs high, many advisors are exiting the business. Other are restructuring their compensation structure. Cambridge Investment Research, an independent broker dealer, estimates that it will spend $15 million to $17 million on technology upgrades and other operational changes in anticipation of the rule.

With higher compliance costs, some are looking to cheaper options, like roboadvisors, to offer scalable solutions.

“Since roboadvisors charge a flat fee, many believe that they will comply with the DOL fiduciary rule without the need to justify fees or show that there is no conflict of interest under the Best Interest Contract Exemption,” wrote Bates Research Groups. Technology firm, CGI suggested roboadvisors will be used to service accounts that otherwise would be deemed not profitable enough and might be orphaned.

However, the question whether roboadvisors themselves can themselves be considered fiduciary is debatable.

Earlier this year the Massachusetts Securities Division issued a policy statement that examined roboadvisor compliance with their fiduciary responsibility. The policy statement questioned software’s ability to take a client’s personal situation into account when issuing advice and conducting proper due diligence.

“The commoditization of advice and streamlining of solutions, based on few broad initial survey questions, lends itself to ‘one-size-fits-many’ portfolios that may not be suitable for each client,” commented Min Zhang, CEO of Totum Wealth, a provider of technology solutions to advisors. The way roboadvisors are structured, she added, lures clients into a potential false sense of confidence that something truly unique is being created for them.

Blaine Aikin, executive chairman at fi360, which offers fiduciary education, certifications, software and practice management offerings, echoed Zhang’s sentiment. Roboadvisors do a good job for people with simple and well-defined goals, he said. Problems arise when cases become more complex, though. Roboadvisors currently do not really personalize their offerings, which might be a breach of due care responsibility.

In addition, algorithms might have systemic biases, which might prevent them from offering advice that is truly in the best interest of their clients.

Both Zhang and Aikin agree technology and roboadvisors will play an increasing role in the future of wealth management, but envision more of a hybrid model, where robos support humans to make better decisions, but the humans have their hands on the wheel.

There is no overarching regulation regarding roboadvisors. FINRA, the SEC and the DoL are dealing with aspects of automated investments advice. It is mostly up to advisors to figure out how to comply with the ever-changing regulatory landscape.

0 comments on “Are robots the answer to DoL rule challenges? Maybe, maybe not.”

Artificial Intelligence, Member Exclusive

Far from changing banking, chatbots aren’t keeping up with call volumes in the COVID-19 era

  • More financial institutions are using chatbots to handle increased customer service loads precipitated by coronavirus.
  • But, are those chatbots really providing meaningful experiences and value?
Sara Toth Stub | June 29, 2020
Artificial Intelligence, Podcasts

Flybits’ Hossein Rahnama: ’90 percent of digital transformation budgets are spent on managing IT complexity’

  • Banks struggle to provide automated recommendations.
  • Flybits wants to remove the IT complexity that eats away at their time and budgets.
Zack Miller | August 27, 2019
Artificial Intelligence

How Genpact’s AI and predictive analytics helped a Formula E racing team finish in the top 3 all season

  • AI and predictive analytics are being applied with positive results to Formula E racing.
  • Genpact's Armen Kherlopian joins us to discuss how this applies to financial services.
Zack Miller | July 29, 2019
Artificial Intelligence, Podcasts

American Express’ Stephanie Schultz: We differentiate customer service by using a blend of automation and human assistance

  • American Express' Digital Labs wants to make the company a bigger part of its customers' lives.
  • VP Stephanie Schultz describes her team's work with new payments technology and messaging platforms.
Zack Miller | July 17, 2019
Artificial Intelligence, New banks

For South Africa’s first challenger bank, conversational AI isn’t just a nice-to-have

  • TymeBank has launched Max, an AI-powered digital assistant.
  • Developed by Finn AI, Max enables the challenger bank to scale.
Zack Miller | April 02, 2019
More Articles