10-Q, Member Exclusive

Who stands to benefit [or suffer] from the Visa and Mastercard settlement?

  • While the Visa-Mastercard settlement news is still fresh and unfolding, understanding the degree to which different players —  merchants, banks, or consumers — truly benefit or stand at a disadvantage in the value chain will necessitate clarity once the dust settles.
  • Currently, it remains an intricate conundrum to unravel.
close

Email a Friend

Who stands to benefit [or suffer] from the Visa and Mastercard settlement?

    After Visa and Mastercard’s landmark settlement over swipe fees, the sentiment ‘better late than never’ resonates strongly.

    If passed, Visa and Mastercard will cut their transaction fees within the United States, a long-awaited development for merchants who stand to reap savings of up to $30 billion in interchange over the next five years. This settlement marks the culmination of a protracted legal battle initiated in 2005 by merchants, who contend that the credit card duopoly charges exorbitant payment processing fees to their detriment.

    As part of the revised terms of the networks’ rules, the two largest credit card networks and their issuing banks will also enforce caps on these new lower rates until 2030 and also eliminate anti-steering provisions.

    Separating fact from anticipation

    While the news is still fresh and unfolding, understanding the degree to which different players —  merchants, banks, or consumers — truly benefit or stand at a disadvantage in the value chain will necessitate clarity once the dust settles.

    Currently, it remains an intricate conundrum to unravel.


    subscription wall for TS Pro

      A victory, but in whose favor?

      by SARA KHAIRI

      After Visa and Mastercard’s landmark settlement over swipe fees, the sentiment ‘better late than never’ resonates strongly.

      If passed, Visa and Mastercard will cut their transaction fees within the United States, a long-awaited development for merchants who stand to reap savings of up to $30 billion in interchange over the next five years. This settlement marks the culmination of a protracted legal battle initiated in 2005 by merchants, who contend that the credit card duopoly charges exorbitant payment processing fees to their detriment.

      As part of the revised terms of the networks’ rules, the two largest credit card networks and their issuing banks will also enforce caps on these new lower rates until 2030 and also eliminate anti-steering provisions.

      Separating fact from anticipation

      While the news is still fresh and unfolding, understanding the degree to which different players —  merchants, banks, or consumers — truly benefit or stand at a disadvantage in the value chain will necessitate clarity once the dust settles.

      Currently, it remains an intricate conundrum to unravel.


      subscription wall for TS Pro

      0 comments on “Who stands to benefit [or suffer] from the Visa and Mastercard settlement?”

      Artificial Intelligence, Member Exclusive, Payments

      Trust Bridges Matter: When agentic systems meet payment reality

      • AI can decide, but consumers still hesitate to hand it their card details. Agentic commerce is still emerging, but the trust gap is already shaping how pilots are built and how much payment autonomy AI is given.
      • We look at how these developments are unfolding and what they may foreshadow for the wider commerce ecosystem.
      Sara Khairi | January 22, 2026
      10-Q, Member Exclusive

      Morgan Stanley’s crypto ETF move – and the risk of getting ‘institutional crypto’ wrong

      • Morgan Stanley plans to launch a spot Bitcoin ETF alongside Solana and Ethereum ETFs that bake in staking as a source of incremental yield.
      • The move reflects institutional confidence that blockchain networks can generate yield within compliant structures. That confidence, however, comes with its risks.
      Sara Khairi | January 21, 2026
      Banking, Member Exclusive, New banks

      Loyalty in banking is now fragmented: How Chime is winning the era of soft switching

      • Customers are redirecting their day-to-day financial transactions elsewhere, while keeping their old accounts on the books.
      • Although some banks pick up early signals yet miss the issue before it fully surfaces, fintechs and neobanks, on the other hand, see this same issue as a compounding opportunity.
      Sara Khairi | January 15, 2026
      10-Q, Member Exclusive

      Deposits vs. Payments – What drives more value for banks today?

      • The crossroads of legacy banking and modern fintech brings a simple yet critical question: what powers lasting value for banks?
      • Investors are moving past the “bank vs. fintech” debate and focusing on how well payments fit into a sustainable funding model.
      Sara Khairi | January 12, 2026
      Banking, Blockchain and Crypto, Member Exclusive

      Crypto made a comeback in 2025 – this time with banks testing the waters

      • Crypto’s resurgence and regulatory clarity in 2025 prompted a handful of banks to experiment in the space rather than sit on the sidelines.
      • This piece looks at what that early engagement may foreshadow for institutional money movement in 2026.
      Sara Khairi | January 08, 2026
      More Articles