10-Q, Member Exclusive

Who stands to benefit [or suffer] from the Visa and Mastercard settlement?

  • While the Visa-Mastercard settlement news is still fresh and unfolding, understanding the degree to which different players —  merchants, banks, or consumers — truly benefit or stand at a disadvantage in the value chain will necessitate clarity once the dust settles.
  • Currently, it remains an intricate conundrum to unravel.
close

Email a Friend

    After Visa and Mastercard’s landmark settlement over swipe fees, the sentiment ‘better late than never’ resonates strongly.

    If passed, Visa and Mastercard will cut their transaction fees within the United States, a long-awaited development for merchants who stand to reap savings of up to $30 billion in interchange over the next five years. This settlement marks the culmination of a protracted legal battle initiated in 2005 by merchants, who contend that the credit card duopoly charges exorbitant payment processing fees to their detriment.

    As part of the revised terms of the networks’ rules, the two largest credit card networks and their issuing banks will also enforce caps on these new lower rates until 2030 and also eliminate anti-steering provisions.

    Separating fact from anticipation

    While the news is still fresh and unfolding, understanding the degree to which different players —  merchants, banks, or consumers — truly benefit or stand at a disadvantage in the value chain will necessitate clarity once the dust settles.

    Currently, it remains an intricate conundrum to unravel.


    subscription wall for TS Pro

      A victory, but in whose favor?

      by SARA KHAIRI

      After Visa and Mastercard’s landmark settlement over swipe fees, the sentiment ‘better late than never’ resonates strongly.

      If passed, Visa and Mastercard will cut their transaction fees within the United States, a long-awaited development for merchants who stand to reap savings of up to $30 billion in interchange over the next five years. This settlement marks the culmination of a protracted legal battle initiated in 2005 by merchants, who contend that the credit card duopoly charges exorbitant payment processing fees to their detriment.

      As part of the revised terms of the networks’ rules, the two largest credit card networks and their issuing banks will also enforce caps on these new lower rates until 2030 and also eliminate anti-steering provisions.

      Separating fact from anticipation

      While the news is still fresh and unfolding, understanding the degree to which different players —  merchants, banks, or consumers — truly benefit or stand at a disadvantage in the value chain will necessitate clarity once the dust settles.

      Currently, it remains an intricate conundrum to unravel.


      subscription wall for TS Pro

      0 comments on “Who stands to benefit [or suffer] from the Visa and Mastercard settlement?”

      Member Exclusive, New banks, Policies & Playbooks

      Fintechs want to become banks. Bunq just found out what the OCC expects in return.

      • For fintechs seeking U.S. bank charters, the OCC is asking: Do the management, capital, risk, and compliance infrastructure hold up? And is the institution ready to operate as a bank, not just alongside one?
      • The OCC may be widening the path to a charter, but it’s also raising the bar for proving readiness.
      Sara Khairi | August 12, 2026
      10-Q, Member Exclusive

      Forget the earnings. Watch where these fintechs are placing their bets.

      • Chime, Block, and Circle each used the quarter to make the case for where fintech’s next moat will be built.
      • Chime is finding a lending advantage in the direct-deposit relationship, Block is rebuilding around AI, and Circle is betting that the bigger opportunity lies in owning the infrastructure beneath stablecoins.
      Sara Khairi | August 10, 2026
      Member Exclusive, Opinion

      Have we mistaken ChatGPT-like LLMs and AI agents for the whole transformation?

      • The industry is increasingly asking: What needs to surround AI before we can trust it?
      • AI needs four things to work well in financial services: data, context, governance, and human oversight. The first two sharpen its intelligence; the latter two make it trustworthy.
      Sara Khairi | August 07, 2026
      Banking, Member Exclusive

      How banks have stopped thinking in products and started thinking in customer journeys

      • As banks weave AI into their customer experiences, many are looking for ways to translate years of customer data into a more complete picture of each customer's needs and context.
      • The difference isn't the data itself, but how well a bank makes sense of a customer's context and goals and builds the right response around that.
      Sara Khairi | August 06, 2026
      Artificial Intelligence, Banking, Data, Member Exclusive

      Before chasing AI, Bank of America wants banks to fix their data first

      • Bank of America has resisted the urge to use AI as a shortcut to efficiency, a temptation that has driven many companies into expensive and poorly conceived AI investments.
      • EricaAssist offers the clearest example of Bank of America's data-first AI strategy, with the bank recently enhancing the employee assistant by integrating Gen AI capabilities.
      Javarya Kamran | August 06, 2026
      More Articles