How banks can stay relevant, not relics: Lessons from BNY & Citi

    Old Guard, New Rules: Who’s keeping up?


    Big banks are playing offense. Fintech competition, tech leaps, and workforce expectations are evolving — so should banks.

    Traditional banks are already trying on a modern fit — experimenting with tech, balancing brick-and-click, rethinking talent, and making new power couple moves in partnerships.

    Two prime examples stood out last week: BNY takes the artificial intelligence route to improve its operations, and Citi continues to use workplace flexibility to navigate talent challenges. While these paths differ, they reflect a shared realization — adapt or risk becoming a museum exhibit.

    Graphic credits: Tearsheet

    BNY: Merging centuries of banking with AI innovation

    Established in 1784, BNY is America’s oldest bank, which has thrived for over two centuries. Yet, instead of clinging to its storied past, the institution is looking forward, betting big on AI as the key to its future.

    In a landmark deal, BNY has entered into a multiyear relationship with OpenAI, a decision that signals more than just technological adoption — it’s an illustration that even the most traditional players should innovate or risk being upstaged by a 25-year-old coder in a hoodie.

    The cornerstone of this AI-driven transformation is Eliza, BNY’s proprietary AI platform, launched in 2024. Initially conceived as an internal chatbot trained on the bank’s vast institutional knowledge, Eliza has evolved into a multifaceted AI tool that empowers employees to build AI-powered applications. More than 50% of the bank’s 52,000 employees actively engage with Eliza, using it for tasks ranging from lead generation to workflow optimization. By integrating OpenAI’s most advanced models launched this year, BNY is supercharging Eliza with next-gen capabilities. These include Deep Research, which can analyze vast amounts of online information to complete multistep research tasks, and Operator, an AI agent capable of browsing the web like a human.

    But why is BNY Mellon making this move now? Necessity. Competition. Strategic vision.

    • Necessity: AI adoption in banking is no longer optional. From compliance to risk management, the financial sector deals with high complexity. AI offers solutions to streamline operations, reduce inefficiencies, and facilitate decision-making. 
    • Competition: Fintech startups and tech giants like Google and Apple are poised to take over market share if they fall too far behind. To hold its ground, BNY likely needs a tech upgrade to offer more AI-driven services.
    • Strategic positioning: With banks emerging as some of the most active adopters of AI, BNY doesn’t want to be a bystander. Partnering with OpenAI gives it access to the latest underlying tech, positioning it as a strong player in the industry.

    However, this transformation is not without its challenges. Integrating advanced AI framework into a 240-year-old institution is like teaching your grandparents to use TikTok. Ensuring compliance with strict regulatory standards, managing the ethical implications of AI-driven decision-making, and upskilling employees to work effectively alongside AI are all significant hurdles. Moreover, cybersecurity remains a major concern — handling sensitive financial data requires strong protective measures to prevent breaches.

    Despite these challenges, BNY is forging ahead, not just out of necessity but out of the foresightedness that AI may likely be a big part of the future of banking. This puts other well-equipped banks on the spot — if the oldest bank in America can adapt, what excuse do the rest have?

    Citigroup’s Hybrid Bet: Why sticking to flexibility might just be its smartest move yet


    subscription wall for TS Pro

    You, me, and the money: How ex-Stripe Emily Luk built a financial management app for couples, Plenty

    Managing money alone is hard enough but when two people and their respective money stories get married, things can get a lot more complicated.

    This is the problem Plenty’s CEO and cofounder Emily Luk set out to solve after she got engaged. She noticed a lack of financial tools for couples and decided to build Plenty, a financial tool that helps couples manage their finances in one place.

    Plenty allows couples to track shared and individual finances, as well as save and invest towards shared and personal goals.

    “There was one thing that was really different from how we thought about things as a generation. There wasn’t really an expectation that one person works, one person manages all the money. No, we’re both working. But it was so hard even to do the simplest thing – we both use a credit card, and I want both of us to know what we’re spending on it,” said Luk.

    Emily Luk, CEO, Plenty

    This is how Emily Luk built a finch that has seen 8x growth in users since December 2024.

    From fintech employee to fintech founder

    Luk is no stranger to the financial industry. She was one of the first 20 members of Stripe’s growth team and in her three years at the company ran initiatives like pricing merchants across the different geographies and forecasting for all the firm’s software products.

    “Stripe really was one of the first companies to take a part of the financial industry and really digitize it. I think that was one of the things that I saw: for so long, payments was such a legacy business, and yet they were able to modernize it,” Luk said. After Stripe, Luk joined Even which was later acquired by Walmart for its fintech venture, One. At Even, Luk was the VP of Strategy and Operations running the company’s goal setting efforts as well as fundraising and investor relations. “Even was really focused on helping people living paycheck to paycheck, reach a point of stability. What was really exciting there is we ended up building a product that reached a million and a half people. Through that, I had a chance to see how big of an impact we could make making software,” she said.

    While the hard and soft skills that Luk built in her time at Stripe and Even have a clear carry over effect to Plenty, her connections within the industry have had an effect too.

    The following are all investors in Plenty:

    • Adam Nash, ex-CEO of Wealthfront,
    • Brian Delahunty, Head of Engineering at Anthropic
    • Mark Goines ex-SVP at Intuit and ex-VP at Charles Schwab are all investors in Plenty.
    • Kevin Durant, all-star professional basketball player

    Choose the right talent

    When it came to building Plenty’s team, Luk and her husband Channing Allen, who is also the CTO at Plenty, prioritized hiring people whose work and drive they were already familiar with. “Builders come from this background where there’s a session of getting both the big picture building something that hasn’t existed before, as well as getting the details right. That was a combination of skills that we were looking for,” she said.

    Left: Channing Allen, CTO, Plenty Right: Emily Luk, CTO, Plenty

    Have a north star but know that the road map can change

    Plenty initially launched with a subscription model – which can be tricky for PFM tools. “It’s clear from surveys and research that, generally, customers don’t want to pay for dedicated budgeting and PFM tools,” said fintech product consultant and fintech builder, Jas Shah, about Intuit sunsetting Mint.

    Plenty was seeing considerable demand for this budgeting product, according to Luk. Based on this feedback the firm decided to launch a “freemium” model, which gives access to the financial management tools to couples for free. The firm makes money when these couples decide to invest with the firm, e.g. through direct indexing and tax-loss harvesting, with a 0.20% investment fee.

    Following this announcement, the firm has seen 8x growth in users, since early December.

    Plenty’s UI

    Marketing to couples

    Unlike most PFM’s Plenty’s product is built for two. The firm’s marketing philosophy has focused on keeping a polished but approachable tone, says Luk. Traditional FIs have mostly focused on building tools and products for the ultra-wealthy, and Plenty positioned itself away from this trend early on but has then used its understanding of couple dynamics to onboard new customers. “For most relationships, one person plays a bigger role in managing the money. So that one person is more likely to say, I want to try out this new product, and that person is ultimately the one who convinces their partner to use our product. So that makes it a bit easier,” she said.

    Layer additional resources on top of the core offering

    The firm also recently announced Esther Perel, psychotherapist, New York Times bestselling author, and a leading voice on managing modern relationships as an advisor to the brand.

    Perel currently contributes to Plenty by providing educational materials for the firm’s blog, newsletter, and podcast, and has recently put together a list of questions couples should ask each other regarding money.

    Esther Perel, Advisor, Plenty

    Perel’s involvement brings some star power to Plenty and also points to the firm’s strategy to encourage conversations about money.

    Traditional financial institutions rarely go beyond TV adverts when it comes to acknowledging money is an emotional and critical topic in consumers’ lives. But fintechs on the other hand have not been afraid of actively engaging with how it feels to manage money. Recently, Chime launched a budgeting coloring book for adults and Ally Bank launched the Money Roots campaign, which focuses on assisting consumers unpack their feelings and narratives about money by engaging in virtual workshops with experts.

    Plenty’s approach builds on the same strategy, but in the form of regular newsletters, blogs, and podcasts, the latter of which, Luk hosts herself usually with an expert in the field as a guest.

    “I get a chance to not only learn from experts directly, but then also bring that knowledge to people who are listening. I think one of the big motivations for it is the reality that money is not purely rational as well,” she said.

    Sidebar: At the heart of finance

    Sidebar is a member-exclusive section where we discuss stories tangential to the main story above.  If you would like to keep reading, please consider becoming a TS Pro reader by clicking below. 

    subscription wall for TS Pro

     

    Klarna and Chime eye IPOs in 2025 — But will the market play nice?

      Can fintech’s brightest stars shine on Wall Street?


      Klarna and Chime are finally ready to test the public markets, likely this year. The Swedish buy now, pay later (BNPL) firm and the US neobank have reportedly confidentially filed in late 2024 for IPOs, marking two of the most anticipated fintech public debuts in recent years.

      But with shifting market conditions, a new administration in the White House, and a mix of investor excitement and skepticism, these IPOs could either be fintech’s grand return to Wall Street — or another cautionary tale.

      The possibility of an IPO for Revolut and Stripe has also been brewing since 2023, but neither company is ready to seal the deal just yet.

      The case for going public

      For Klarna and Chime, the timing makes sense — at least on paper. Markets have started 2025 with a bullish streak, fueled by cooling inflation, a rebounding IPO pipeline, and a government that appears friendlier to fintech innovation. However, alongside that enthusiasm come fiercer competition and sharper investor scrutiny.

      After a turbulent couple of years, Klarna has been eyeing a public listing. Its valuation plummeted from a $46 billion peak in 2021 to around $6.7 billion in 2022 before rebounding to an estimated $15 billion. Going public could help Klarna raise fresh capital, expand further into the US, and compete more strongly with rivals like Affirm and Apple’s Pay Later service.

      As for Chime, with over 20 million customers, it is one of the biggest digital banking players in the US. However, it hasn’t raised funds since 2021, when it was valued at around $25 billion. A public listing could provide it with capital to fuel growth and potentially diversify beyond its core product offerings, which include a fee-free digital banking experience. 

      The aspirations and tactical execution

      The post-pandemic era has turned IPOs into a proving ground rather than a victory lap. Companies can no longer bank on hype alone — they need solid profitability, sustainable growth, and a narrative that withstands intense scrutiny. The Federal Reserve’s tighter monetary policies, global market volatility, and the shift from a liquidity-driven to a fundamentals-driven investment climate are creating higher entry barriers.

      Both Klarna and Chime will be entering a relatively less forgiving market and heightened investor concern than in 2021, a year that saw 61 fintech IPOs — far more than the 16 that have launched in the past three years combined.


      subscription wall for TS Pro

      “We want this to be a long term relationship, minimum 5-10 years”: Citi’s Chafic Haddad on how the bank chooses fintech clients and builds evolving partnerships

      Choosing the right bank to work with is a skill that fintechs need to develop and nurture. When the right choices are made, fintechs can find themselves working with banks that not only provide a strong compliance and banking layer but also have opportunities for the fintech to plug into the bank’s infrastructure and become more than just a client. 

      This evolving landscape is what Citi’s Global Head of Fintech Sales, Chafic Haddad, provided insight on when I spoke to him. He dove into the maturity cycle that fintechs go through by starting from offering basic products like accounts and then eventually growing enough to explore capital markets and investment banking. He also described how Citi helps these fintechs spread their wings beyond their local markets.

      Listen to today’s conversation to learn from Haddad’s experience about how the bank helps fintechs grow sustainably and eventually spread their wings beyond their local geographies and the way Citi organizes and manages these relationships.

      Big ideas

      Chafic’s role: My team’s job is to provide or connect fintechs with what we do within the transaction bank. We’re the business that manages the overall relationship across all Citi products. We have a two fold structure: you’ve got the commercial bank, which would typically look after small to medium sized fintechs, and then the more mature unicorn type fintech would sit within our banking organization.

      How Citi chooses which fintechs to work with: We consider a range of factors including growth potential. We have finite resources. We can’t take on everybody and it’s a space that continues to grow and evolve. Growth is key, because we want to be working with entities that have ambitions. Given our network, we’d like to be partnering with fintechs that want to grow beyond their home market.

      How Citi’s fintech relationships begin: We want this to be a long term relationship, at a minimum of 5-10 years or even longer. Initially, the entry point is the business that I represent, which is the transaction banking business, or the Citi Treasury and Trade Solutions (TTS) because that is the go to area for any fintech on day one. They want accounts, access to payment schemes, and treasury management.

      How Citi collaborates with fintech clients: They [fintech CEOs] have a vested interest in being part of the strategic discussion to work with Citi. This is ultimately their business and their name on the door. Those conversations take place at multiple levels, often starting at the top of the house, and then once we focus or zoom in.

      Evolving relationships:
      Many start off as clients and we collaborate and co-create. But in several cases, they actually come into our ecosystem as providers of service and become clients over time.

      Listen to the podcast

      Subscribe: Apple Podcasts I SoundCloud I Spotify

      The full transcript

      Building on legacy

      Whether you play in the merchant acquiring space as a fintech, or you offer domestic cross border solutions or drive FX (foreign exchange) platforms, you need a provider that can give you access to payment channels and schemes, support you with operating accounts, help you manage liquidity, and help you manage and safeguard client monies. And to do all of that while guiding you through the regulatory environment. 

      So I would say those are the two or three things that stand out for me in terms of what a fintech really needs from a provider or a banking institution. As a 200 year plus financial institution with international branches in over 90 countries, we believe that we are well-placed to support fintechs, whether they are domestically focused or looking to offer their solutions globally. We’re leveraging our long history as a provider of financial services as well as our global presence to roll out solutions to prioritize a digital, 24/7 approach to payments; advancing the client experience and ensuring liquidity for our clients around the clock.

      Our network is unique. We have the largest network today compared to other large multinational banks, and that is something that really appeals to our clients, because it underlines our commitment to the international arena. 

      When you deal with Citi, you’re effectively dealing with the institution that’s plugging you into one platform. The model is similar wherever you do business in New York, London, Tokyo or Sydney. The products and solutions are more or less the same.

      I say ‘more or less’ because there are some differences that are driven by local regulation, but effectively, we can be your one stop shop. As far as a global strategy is concerned, we talked about how Citi supports fintechs around the world, but there is also collaboration or co-creation that Citi has entered into with a number of fintechs to come up with solutions that are now offered as mainstream. 

      One example of that is our Pay-to-China offering. If you think about Chinese merchants that are selling online overseas, one of their challenges is collecting funds. So the Pay-to-China offering at Citi enables offshore payment intermediaries to pay directly into their merchant’s local currency bank accounts in China for goods that have been sold online or overseas through e-commerce platforms. It’s a solution that leverages our FX capabilities and access to domestic payment schemes in China to provide a seamless cross border payment experience. 

      Another example is our Spring by Citi® offering, which is our acquiring engine and digital payment acceptance solution. It’s also an example of how we’re collaborating and co-creating with ecosystem fintech partners to roll out this offering in multiple markets.

      One more example is Citi® Payments Express, which is our 24/7 cloud-enabled digital commerce solution. It’s a solution that facilitates multi-domestic and real time liquidity and gives us the opportunity to scale to 100 times the volume while operating at much lower costs. We’re looking to roll out Express in the top global markets in the next few years.

      Fintech priorities: Growing beyond local borders

      Fintech entities that we’ve been in business with for a number of years are now looking to grow, – if they haven’t already done so – beyond their home market. That is typically driven by both a need to support existing customers who are doing business in multiple markets, as well as opportunities to acquire new ones. 

      The other interesting dynamic is that many set out to offer a single product. We will be your FX partner and we will help you acquire if you’re selling in marketplaces. Now we’re seeing those same entities develop and sell more than one solution. In order for them to expand their product offering, some have even gone as far as acquiring banking licenses, and that has allowed them to get into the deposit-taking space and lending space, as well as do other regulatory-focused products.

      On working with Citi 

      So one thing that we’re very keen on is we don’t simply want to be a provider of service. That is something that typically kickstarts the relationship. But over time, we want to co-create with the fintech clients that we do business with. That means we sit together, understand what their strategic objectives are, how they envision their strategy to be over the next three to five years, and then work with them in building the products and solutions to get them there. 

      We typically connect at various levels of the organization. Unlike some other sectors, you’ll find that in the fintech space, a lot of the CEOs are owners and operators. They have a vested interest in being part of the strategic discussion. This is ultimately their business and their name on the door. Those conversations take place at multiple levels, often starting at the top of the house, and then once we focus or zoom in on an idea or an innovative solution, that gets focused with the people at various levels.

      What’s interesting about our relationships with fintechs is they’re quite dynamic. Many start off as clients and we collaborate and co-create. But in several cases, they actually come into our ecosystem as providers of service and become clients over time. It’s a dynamic space. There are opportunities for us to plug into one another’s capabilities. 

      One example of that is we have a cross currency crossborder platform called Worldlink. Even though we are present in over 90 countries, there are some markets where we are not physically on the ground for one reason or another. So in those instances, we need to find a partner that we can connect with and collaborate with to help us deliver our service on the ground – and those are the kinds of collaborations that take place with some of the fintech clients.

      We’re quite deliberate about the fintechs we choose to take on as clients. We consider a range of factors including growth potential. We have finite resources, as you can appreciate. We can’t take on everybody and it’s a space that continues to grow and evolve. Growth is key, because we want to be working with entities that have ambitions. Given our network, we’d like to be partnering with fintechs that want to grow beyond their home market, as I mentioned earlier, and actually have longer term objectives. For us, these relationships are difficult to establish. The onboarding process is rigorous. It requires quite a lot of heavy lifting. 

      So once we get over that, we want this to be a long term relationship, at a minimum 5-10 years or even longer. Initially, the entry point is the business that I represent, which is the transaction banking business, or the Citi Treasury and Trade Solutions (TTS) because that is the go to area for any fintech on day one: we want accounts, we want access to payment schemes, and we want treasury management. 

      We want help collecting once we plug them into these solutions and we then evolve the conversation into other areas, whether it’s around capital markets or broader investment banking or working capital.

      Citi’s evolution to work with fintechs

      The capabilities within our network continue to evolve, as we roll out new solutions, and we’re doing that all the time. The ultimate aim is to be able to do that across the network to give you that seamless experience wherever you’re doing business with Citi. That is something that continues to be at the heart of everything that we do. Given the geographic reach that we have, we have expertise at the ground level to guide our fintech clients through the regulatory challenges, local laws, regulations, what to expect and how to go about licensing. That puts us in a unique position. We also have an experienced and dedicated fintech sales team – my role, and that of my teams, is focused exclusively on the fintech segment. 

      We don’t talk to anybody else from a client segmentation perspective, unless they fall into our fintech definition. Hence, you’ve got that expertise on the team, that network that allows you to operate globally, and you’ve got the local expertise on the ground. I’d also add that over time, we’ve become a trusted advisor to our clients, so our deep rooted industry expertise enables us to guide our fintech clients as they seek new opportunities, new customer segments and look to grow.

      Navigating timezones as a professional

      Geography does not matter much when you’re in a global role, because I’m constantly on the road. From a timezone perspective, it works for me, because it gives me a good half day with Asia in the morning, and then as the day goes on, Europe and the UK come online. And then my afternoons and evenings are with the U.S.. So it works from that perspective. 

      The way we’re organized is that I have regionals, and they’re located in New York, Miami – which is our Latin Hub – Hong Kong, and Dublin, which is our service European hub. They have individuals that report to their own teams and all of that is part of a wider team which supports our fintech clients and goes out and positions what we do best at Citi to those clients.

      Citi’s organizational structure

      I sit within the product organization. We also have side by side coverage organizations – what we at Citi call corporate banking – as well as our commercial bank. Commercial banking tends to be the entry point for a relatively new-to-market fintech: these are firms that have been operating for a couple of years, they’re low turnover, but have a good runway ahead of them.

      My team’s job is to provide or connect fintechs with what we do within the transaction bank –the business that manages the overall relationship across all products. Citi also hast the commercial bank, which would typically look after small to medium sized fintechs, and then the more mature unicorn type fintech would sit within our banking organization.

      I typically would service the fintechs that are more complex and have had several years of history under their belt, that are now at a stage where they have either expanded internationally or are continuing to expand internationally. That’s not to suggest that we don’t connect with our partners on the commercial bank, because what they’re looking after are fintechs at an early stage. But that early stage quickly becomes a later stage, and then there are opportunities for my team to plug into their strategy and provide them with the solutions they’re looking for to continue their growth. 

      Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed by the individual, unless reflected in Citi’s Research Reports, are those of the speaker and may not necessarily reflect the views of Citi or any of its affiliates.  All opinions are made at the time of the recording and are subject to change without notice. The expressions of opinion are not intended to be a forecast of future events or a guarantee of future results.

      Cupid’s Got a Ledger: Romance and rivalry in finance

        A Valentine’s Month take on banks and fintechs


        Last week, I teased a mystery topic, letting you stew in curiosity about what was coming. Well, the wait is over! Given that Valentine’s Day was just last Friday, I’m leaning toward a theme that fits the season: unions & collaborations.

        We often dive into stories of partnerships that start with fireworks and flawless roadmaps — only to crash and burn for one reason or another. But today, let’s moonwalk through this. Let’s talk about rivals who went from side-eyeing each other to shaking hands (at least in the business world).

        Take banks and fintechs, for example. Their early days were more ‘battle for dominance’ than ‘let’s work together’ — fintechs painted themselves as challengers, while banks saw them as pesky invaders. But time and market realities have a way of reshaping narratives.

        Now, banks and fintechs are increasingly recognizing their strengths. It’s a classic ‘you complete me’ scenario — if corporate romance were a thing.

        Graphic credits: Tearsheet

        But let’s hit rewind for a moment. How did these once-feuding forces go from wary opponents to strategic allies? And where do these kinds of relationships stand now?

        Let’s dig in.

        Block vs. J.P. Morgan Chase: From competition to cooperation

        J.P. Morgan Chase initially saw Square (now Block) as a major small-business payment competitor. In 2014, CEO Jamie Dimon famously warned that Silicon Valley was “coming to eat our lunch.” Square’s success with small business payments and its Cash App product placed it in direct competition with Chase’s merchant services.


        subscription wall for TS Pro

        What BaaS companies learned the hard way in 2024 — and what’s coming next

        Is BaaS the land of the dead? Actually, not so much. 2024 was admittedly a difficult time for partner banks and fintechs alike when it came to BaaS. But through the fires of consent orders and lost customer deposits came a realization that all firms involved needed to look more deeply into how they structured their relationships.

        Lauren McCollom, SVP and Head of Embedded Finance at Grasshopper, called 2024 an “enlightening and chaotic year” for BaaS players. As consent order numbers climbed into double digits, hitting institutions like Evolve Bank & Trust, Sutton Bank, and Blue Ridge Bank, many fintechs decided they had to pivot and find new partner banks to ensure their programs’ longevity and survival.

        On the other hand, affected partner banks had to dig deep into their existing programs and look for weaknesses, while non-affectees saw more and more fintechs queuing up for partnerships. “This fintech outreach wave which fueled pipelines and enabled partner banks to engage with leading fintechs looking for safety and stability in long-term programs with an established partner bank,” said McCollom.

        In today’s story, we look at the major challenges partner banks and fintechs faced in 2024 and what trends may emerge in the new year for these firms.

        Recap: 2024’s BaaS trials

        Here is a top down view of all the challenges partner banks and fintechs faced last year.

        The regulators and BaaS programs: One major difficulty BaaS partners faced was dealing with enforcement actions, reconciliation issues born out of underbaked BaaS programs, and a desire by fintechs to build redundancy in their bank partnerships.

        “What came from this period in early 2024 were inquiries and clarification questions from fintechs trying to cut through the noise. Overall this permitted the education of the industry and alignment on what ‘direct’ can mean in BaaS,” McCollom added.

        Compliance became top of mind and ultimately led to a reinvigoration of compliance technology providers and a deeper look at how these tools could be used to strengthen existing BaaS partnerships in the face of regulatory scrutiny.

        On the other hand, fintechs that foresaw trouble decided they needed a change of partners and sought to migrate their programs leading to a few partner banks seeing more traffic. And while this narrowed the number of partner banks operating in the BaaS landscape, those that continued built much stronger foundations in compliance.

        Balancing act: Given the regulatory focus on the industry, firms had to carefully manage building better compliance capabilities while looking after the bottom line. “The balancing act of investing in the necessary infrastructure, controls, and capabilities while maintaining a profitability model added further complexity to the equation,” said Richard Rosenthal, Principal at Deloitte.

        The solution to evolving BaaS programs to be resilient to regulatory headwinds for many was putting in place the right infrastructure. There is a class of partner banks and fintechs emerging now that focus on implementing the right controls and processes, added Rosenthal.

        Expectations and trends for 2025

        _____________________________________________________________________

        TS Pro subscription options

        The Quarterly Review: How Zelle’s GM Denise Leonhard plans on leading the firm to $1 trillion a year and beyond


        Notes from the desk: Welcome to this month’s Quarterly Review, a series where I dive into what executives from some of the best brands in financial services are focusing on in this quarter, as well as how they are planning to achieve their goals. It’s a chance for the industry to learn about what goes on behind an FI’s four walls and how leadership manages their priorities. 

        But that’s not all: a review implies no mandates, a check in. So stay tuned next quarter to learn whether the executive achieves her plans and translates theory into reality.


        In this edition, we focus on Denise Leonhard, GM of Zelle.

        Half a trillion dollars were transferred over the Zelle network in the first half of 2024, according to Zelle’s report in October. This came with a 27% increase in transaction volume YOY for the firm, showing how quickly the Zelle network is expanding. 

        At the start of 2025, Denise Leonhard, Zelle’s GM, joins the The Quarterly Review roster to report that the firm is doubling down on this growth and plans to surpass that golden $1 trillion mark very soon. Her strategy spearheading this effort to go beyond the growth benchmark is a mix of focusing on fundamentals like consumer experience and security, as well as a strategic move to let the growing adoption numbers “do the talking” and attract more banks into joining the network. 

        The focus: Growing the network while providing an optimized payments experience to meet the financial needs of Americans

        Leonhard: Our goal is to continue that trajectory and surpass $1 trillion in transaction volume by the next edition of The Quarterly Review. We aim to be the largest and most secure platform for Americans to send money to people they know and love, and small businesses they trust.  

        1. Expanding the number of banks on the Zelle network: One specific angle of growth we are prioritizing in 2025 is increasing the number of banks on the Zelle network. We connect more than 2,200 banks and credit unions, and we are engaging with financial institutions every day to grow that number. Americans rely on Zelle, and any person with a bank account should be able to have access to safe and fast peer-to-peer (P2P) payments through their bank.  

        We’re proud that we have banks of all sizes on our network. In fact, 95% of the financial institutions on our network are community banks and credit unions, including nearly 50% of Minority Depository Institution (MDI) banks. Without Zelle, these smaller institutions may not be able to offer P2P payments and would struggle to compete in the marketplace. Their customers, who depend on those local banking relationships, are already underserved by the broader financial system and would be left further behind by the shift towards digital payments. 

        2. Meeting financial needs: A recent Bank of America Institute study found that 26% of all American households are living paycheck to paycheck. With Zelle, money is directly received in the bank accounts of consumers who are least able to wait for transfers to process, making it easier for them to pay or get paid, and to access their money almost immediately. That immediacy of funds is critical for millions of people across the country

        This is also true of the small businesses who use Zelle to pay people or receive payments for services performed. Payment via Zelle powers local economies by providing businesses that rely on our service with access to instant liquidity that not only puts food on the table for their families, but enables them to pay for their expenses, and be better prepared to grow and thrive.  

        Plan of action

        For the millions of consumers who rely on our service, the best thing that Zelle can be is available.

        1. Ensuring we are up and running: Reliability is the most important promise to deliver on for a technology like ours. Our users expect to be up and running whenever someone needs to pay a landscaper or cover their share of dinner. That means every step we take to expand requires even more investment in our foundations. Our engineers work nonstop to ensure that we have a strong and resilient platform.

        We need to deliver a strong and reliable network that can continue to grow and innovate.

        2. Leverage network effects: To achieve growth, we need to continue to optimize the experience for our users. The more that people are using Zelle to pay the people they know and trust, the more their relationship with their bank is reinforced, and other banks and credit unions want to join the network and offer the same great service to their consumers.

        The question becomes: How do we improve the user experience? The answer: By meeting consumers where they are.

        3. Prioritizing consumers’ user experience: Our design teams do extensive research, asking Zelle users about how they use the product, what is working, and what could be better. Then, they work closely with our product teams and bank partners to act on those insights. We are constantly thinking about new ways to deploy Zelle overall or help small businesses save time by using Zelle instead of cash or checks.

        4. Centering safety of consumer funds: Finally, if you want to provide the best P2P payments experience you need to work to be the safest. Last year, the FTC received 2.6 million fraud reports with only 5% of those scams occurring through P2P networks. The constant threat to consumers is a serious issue, as we all face an unrelenting stream of fraudulent texts, calls, social media posts, and more- all from criminals trying to swindle them out of money.

        Fighting fraud and scams is not a new initiative for Zelle. It is part of our DNA and something that we do every day. We are working on new technologies to help participating financial institutions identify potentially suspicious payments and to help consumers remain vigilant to the threat of bad actors.

        In 2023, we processed 99.95% of transactions without a report of scam or fraud, but we know the work to stay ahead of criminals is never done. There have been criminals for as long as there has been currency, and unfortunately, that will likely continue.

        Since the network’s inception in 2017, Zelle has maintained a steady and positive trajectory. We will continue that momentum in the year ahead by strengthening our foundation, refining our service, and providing even more consumers with a safe, reliable, and easy way to pay people they know and trust.


        You may have missed


        Looking back and moving forward: How fintechs will beat back the dark clouds of 2024, capitalize on trends like AI, and build resilient firms in 2025

        From ‘BaaS is dead’ to discussing how Gen AI and Open Banking could significantly change how fintechs connect to banks, serve customers, and help push the industry forward, 2024 has been a really happening year for fintechs. 

        In this new year we look at how fintechs fared in 2024 and explore what shifts we can expect from these companies in this new year. 

        Victoria Zuo, Principal at QED investors, says after a few years of headwinds she expects 2025 to be a year of recovery. 

        The turnaround for fintechs was most evident in the uptick in public markets. It restored confidence in fintech companies following successful IPOs, according to Zuo. On the other hand, the private market continued to cherry-pick fintechs that exhibited they had what it takes to reach profitability, she added. 

        Most importantly, in this year of many changes, fintechs had to find a way to pivot away from ‘growth at all costs’ and towards efficient scaling and operational discipline. 

        “The year showcased the resilience of the sector as it adapted to macroeconomic challenges and recalibrated for long-term success,” Zuo added. 

        Looking back: The trials of 2024 

        Last year came with challenges that destabilized assumptions about what it takes to build fintechs, run them, drive them to success:

        a) The interest rates paradox: At the start of 2024, interest rates remained high and the uncertainty surrounding cuts continued to challenge fintech leaders to think on their feet about how their firms will make money. “Rising rates squeezed margins for lending-focused fintechs, forcing them to diversify revenue streams and focus on underwriting excellence,” said Zuo. 

        Source: SVB

        Research by SVB backs this up, showing that fintechs have had to focus on acquiring high quality borrowers instead of extending credit to borrowers that may carry revolving balances. But as a result of this strategy, fintechs have had to reap their profits from interchange fees.

        Elusive funding: Fintech leaders had a hard time chasing VC dollars in 2024, pushing them to focus on their business models. “Access to venture capital remained limited, prompting startups to extend their runways through cost optimization and prioritizing monetization over growth,” she said.

        Source: SVB

        The looming regulator: In 2024, regulators started to contract the freedom the industry had available to innovate and pushed its leaders towards building more safeguards and guardrails. This was most evident in how fintech-bank partnerships became strained due to a towering amount of consent orders for bank partners. “The regulatory landscape, especially in areas like BNPL and crypto, grew more stringent, pushing fintechs to invest in compliance and risk management,” Zuo added. 

        Capitol Hill in flux: 2024 was an election year and the fintech industry was no stranger to this. FIntech leaders were caught in between red and blue, as questions about the Biden administration taking a more pro-regulation stance through government bodies like the CFPB clashed with ideas how a Trump administration could shift this focus. 

        “A new administration could bring a more business-friendly approach, particularly in areas like crypto, financial inclusion, and open banking,” said Zuo. 

        The regulatory push didn’t just impact how fintechs chose partners and structured products but also impacted their bottom lines. 

        “Compliance costs have risen due to rising regulatory pressure, especially regarding BaaS partnerships. Fintechs are now responsible for more compliance requirements, leading to higher operational costs and a greater focus on regulatory diligence,” said SVB’s Head of National Fintech and Specialty Finance, Nick Christian.

        But Zuo feels that moving ahead, this focus on building a strong compliance-forward foundation could be beneficial for the sector, saying that the stricter regulatory environment served as a “forcing function for fintechs to strengthen compliance” and will help in building consumer trust and robustness in the system in the long term. 

        The making of a hero: The fintechs that rose up from these challenges were focused on improving cash flows, lengthening their runways, and had an eye on customer pain points, as well as regulation shifts.

        _____________________________________________________________________

        subscription wall for TS Pro

        How FIs can partner with parents to build better financial literacy programs

        Social media fueled misinformation and evolving consumer expectations are driving financial brands to focus on financial literacy of younger consumers.

        When financial firms decide to build an impactful financial literacy strategy, its better for everyone involved. But doing this isn’t as easy as it looks. For consumer education to be effective, FIs need to identify how to engage younger audiences and what areas to focus on the most.

        So far, many different financial literacy strategies have been employed: podcasts, coloring books, games, college campus-focused campaigns, and social media-based influencer marketing.

        Bringing parents into the picture

        How to engage: However, one resource that financial brands may need to leverage more are parents. An American parent offers an average of 114 unique pieces of financial advice to their children in a year, according to data.

        What needs to be addressed and why: And while parents are fairly confident in guiding their children about matters like budgeting, savings, credit cards, and debt, only 4% of parents feel equipped to guide their children about international finance like moving money across borders, according to the research.

        Parents’ lack of confidence in their ability to teach children about international finance may impact how younger consumers access global opportunities in the future and their ease with functioning or operating businesses that surpass geographies. “This disconnect is particularly significant because we see younger generations growing up in an inherently more global world. Whether studying abroad, working remotely for international companies, or maintaining relationships across borders, their financial needs will likely be more globally oriented than their parents,” said Ankita D’Mello, Principal Product Manager (North America), at Wise.

        Why international finance is hard to explain

        International finance may be tricky for parents to get into because it requires a significant amount of scaffolding in a child’s understanding of the financial world. For example, when explaining an international money transfer between bank accounts, parents have to now explain multiple related concepts, says D’Mello, including:

        • Exchange rate margins and why the amount received might differ from what was sent
        • Why processing times can vary between countries
        • How different countries have different banking systems and requirements
        • The role of intermediate banks and why they matter

        It’s these concepts that financial brands need to target when thinking of how to empower parents to teach their children about international finance more effectively.

        How to empower parents

        Financial brands can play two distinct roles here: one as the accessible tool and the other as the facilitator. These are some strategies FIs could adopt to help parents be more confident in their abilities to educate their children about finances:

        1. Be a part of the solution: For example, one way Wise makes cross border transactions easier is by describing their fee structure upfront. This helps parents if they choose to demonstrate how a transaction works in practice and also helps alleviate parents’ personal anxieties about the process and any associated confusion.

        But the firm is also increasingly focusing on the educational aspect of its tools and digital presence by doubling down on providing related support in its app to make sure consumers can do their transactions and learn in the same place. “A particularly telling statistic from our research is that 48% of parents find it challenging to identify trustworthy financial information online. This insight has strengthened our commitment to transparency in financial services and accuracy in our blog’s communication and educational content for the general public. We use this channel as a way to break down complex topics into digestible information for our customers and general consumers,” said D’Mello.

        2. Design for two: Another strategy that D’Mello recommends firms should consider is taking a “dual audience approach” when developing products and communication strategies. This insight comes from data which shows that 40% of parents are worried about how relevant their financial advice will be as their children mature and that 70% of parents are willing to improve their own knowledge by trying out new tools and resources.

        Some specific strategies that could enhance this type of product development are:

        • Developing tools that facilitate in-app collaborative learning between parents and children.
        • Creating content that helps parents explain complex financial concepts.
        • Ensuring transparency in how products work, as this helps parents more accurately explain concepts.
        • Providing resources that grow with families as financial needs become more sophisticated.

        3. Build parent’s confidence and encourage conversations: For FIs that don’t have an extensive financial literacy strategy for younger consumers, one relatively easy place to start is focusing on providing talking points on what parents need to address when it comes to difficult topics like international finance.

        “Having a standalone web page that’s dedicated to helping parents talk to teens about money would be greatly appreciated by parents and caretakers. Having information categorized for specific age ranges would also be helpful,” said Annie Cole, financial coach, book author, and founder of Money Essentials for Women.

        Moreover, financial brands can also leverage different types of content like podcasts to engage both parents and children about money-related topics. Although not focused on international finance, one great example of this is the Million Bazillion podcast, sponsored by Greenlight, which tackles kids’ financial queries in a story-telling format while also including discussion questions and tips for parents on a supplementary website.

        The bond of trust between parent and child can be an important driver of financial literacy, but it’s underused by FIs who primarily focus on casting the parent in the supervisor’s role. This is a missed opportunity. Especially because financial firms already occupy a position of trust in communities, combining it with a parent’s role in the home can create a powerful complement. This will h

        elp FIs create more informed consumers for the future, and also invest in themselves becoming a trusted household name and brand.

        Sidebar: The power of the dad-esque influencer

        Sidebar is a member-exclusive section where we explore themes tangential to the main story above. If you would like to keep reading, please consider becoming a TS PRO subscriber by clicking below. subscription wall for TS Pro