‘Payment companies are taking a clear political stance’: Politics and payments in the wake of the Trump administration

  • Should payments be politicized? As more than 400 people face criminal charges for the Capitol riots, we explore the repercussions on the payments industry.
  • Experts weigh in on potential polarization and regulations in the long term.

Email a Friend

‘Payment companies are taking a clear political stance’: Politics and payments in the wake of the Trump administration

The Capitol insurrection caused a swift public divorce between financial institutions and former president Trump along with his supporters. JPMorgan Chase, Goldman Sachs, BlackRock, Bank of America and Wells Fargo ceased their political contributions through their PACs. Payments players such as Visa, Mastercard and American Express also suspended their PAC donations to Trump and his associates.

E-commerce network Shopify closed two online stores affiliated with the ex-president, including those operated by the Trump campaign and the Trump Organization. Global payments provider Stripe declined to process payments for the Trump campaign’s website because of user policy violations regarding an incitement to violence.

PayPal blocked an account held by Joy in Liberty, a group that facilitated travel expenses for Trump supporters to gather in Washington for the riots. It also ceased operations with Christian crowdfunding site GiveSendGo which raised funds for individuals who attended the siege. 

When it’s all said and done, what does the payments blockade really mean for the payments industry at large?

“These moves are quite significant as these payment companies are taking a clear political stance when there was no legal or judicial decision that would enforce such a shutdown,” said Arcady Lapiro, founder of Agora Services, a digital technology provider for banks.

Online donors contribute millions in fundraising for political campaigns in the U.S and those contributions are processed through payments platforms like Stripe.

“A financial tech company that stops processing donations will likely have a more significant impact on a candidate’s fundraising than an individual company whose PAC stops donating,” said Brendan Fischer, the director of federal reform at the Campaign Legal Center. “A corporate PAC may only give $5,000 to a candidate’s campaign, but potentially millions of dollars will flow through a payment processing company.”

The payments void created by the fallout against Trump and his allies raises the question of whether this could lead to a visible and long term political divide in the payments space. 

“I don’t think so. There is a tiny percentage of extremely loyal supporters of Trump who may look for alternate payment providers not based in the U.S or pursue cryptocurrencies. Some niche players are going to emerge that would accept any business, even if it is controversial,” said Lapiro. 

They might not have to. The Wall Street Journal reported that despite its announced ban, Stripe continued to process payments through alternative routes, such as the Republican fundraising platform WinRed, which supports the majority of Trump fundraising efforts.

The fall out will lead to a new wave of regulations, though, according to fintech commentator Chris Skinner.

“It does set a dangerous precedent when technology companies start to censor who can use their services as, usually, it is governments. Governments are meant to regulate the system, not corporations,” said Skinner

“Governments want to manage their societies and economies, and not have that delegated to Jack Dorsey, Mark Zuckerberg or Patrick Collison.” 

Public stances of corporate censuring against Trump have also increased payment companies’ internal evaluations of merchants and the type of transactions processed.

“The January 6th insurrection has brought to light how rules against processing payments associated with ‘hate and harm’ are ill-defined,” said Deana Rich, co-founder of payments infrastructure platform, Infinicept. 

“The regulations are not clear cut and many payments companies are reviewing their merchant portfolios, paying even more attention to with whom their merchants are transacting. We will most likely see payments companies closing merchant accounts if they could be associated with a hate or harm entity.”

0 comments on “‘Payment companies are taking a clear political stance’: Politics and payments in the wake of the Trump administration”


With Direct Payouts, Visa can push payments to cards and accounts cross border

  • Visa Direct has built an ecosystem of senders and receivers powered by push payments.
  • Visa is now launching Visa Direct Payouts, extending push payments cross border and to more types of accounts.
Zachary Miller | March 30, 2021

‘2020 was the year of QR code adoption — 2021 will be the explosion’: QR codes continue to climb in popularity

  • Past the three-month mark of 2021, we’re still seeing QR codes grow in popularity.
  • But how this payment method will expand continues to leave the future of QR codes kind of blurry.
Rivka Abramson | March 18, 2021

Baseball fans will get a cashless payment experience when they re-enter Petco Park this season

  • Baseball fans will have a cashless experience when they re-enter San Diego Padres' Petco Park next season.
  • The team signed a partnership with Tappit to enable fans to make transactions through the MLB Ballpark app at the stadium.
Rimal Farrukh | March 18, 2021

Subway standardizes payments across its stores and geographic footprint

  • Subway now offers a standardized payment solution across its European franchisees.
  • Amadis and Worldline are part of nexo standards, a member association which aims to globally standardize payment processes.
Rivka Abramson | March 12, 2021

Payoneer’s new card upgrades SMB purchasing capabilities

  • Small businesses continue to pursue solutions that remove friction from their spending.
  • Payoneer is launching a new card to address cross border purchases for SMBs.
Zachary Miller | March 11, 2021
More Articles