66% of Americans expect to have a Digital Identity Wallet by 2023

  • Digital Identity Wallets can cut down on KYC/AML costs and are quickly becoming a part of consumers’ expectations.
  • Let’s review the model this new form of identity verification will take and the ethos that should guide its development.

Email a Friend

66% of Americans expect to have a Digital Identity Wallet by 2023

As Early Warning Services, the parent company of Zelle, gears up to launch its own bank-backed wallet, the industry is looking at the technology in a new way. This transition may be about more than just going digital with payments -- it foretells the importance of digital identities.

Digital identities can help financial institutions fulfill KYC requirements and build better online experiences. But managing multiple digital identity credentials can be a tough task. This is where Digital Identity Wallets come in. A single wallet can hold multiple verification credentials for an individual or organization and help avoid reliance on passwords.

Banking on Digital Identity Wallets

Unlike offline channels, verifying identity in the digital space is an issue of trust – and one that can be incredibly difficult to resolve for FIs as well as governing bodies. In fact, data by Gartner shows that 30% of all national governments will enable Digital Identity Wallets for mobile phones by 2024.

Also inclined towards the emerging technology, more than 66% of Americans expect to have a digital wallet this year. 54% of consumer say they would prefer to get their wallets from banks, followed by smartphone manufacturers. 

Type of companies from which consumers would want a digital identity wallet
Digital Identity wallet value proposition

Over 66% of Americans expect to have a Digital Identity Wallet by 2023, and 54% of consumers in all age groups prefer to use a Digital Wallet issued by a bank. Ease of use and loyalty options within preferred stores have emerged as the primary value-added features customers expect to see in their Digital Identity Wallets.

The Expert Group’s survey data shows that 66% of banks have already started issuing Digital Identity Wallets or will do so in the future. Through these wallets, banks can use credentials issued by other banks, third parties as well as governing bodies. If the digital identities for the wallets are managed by an Identity Provider (IDP), additional costs may be levied on banks for verification processes. 

Value Proposition

As far as banks are concerned, however, third-party information like customers’ personal information, KYC info, creditworthiness and fraud profiles may be worth the extra cost. As the chart below shows, KYC info surfaces as the most valuable bit of information for this process. This may be directly related to the complexities of current KYC processes.

What kind of credential attributes you are or would you like to received to serve customers better?

In case banks don’t plan to develop and offer Digital Identity Wallets, they can instead develop their own credentials that can be shared with third-party wallets. This would allow banks to continue to serve as the broker of “trust” and “verified identities” without the hassle of developing in-house solutions.

There can be downsides to this approach, as well. For example, partnering with third-party wallets will significantly reduce the room banks have to build their own customer experiences and brand image, leaving them with fewer ways to differentiate themselves. 

If banks decide to issue credentials, partnering with multiple Wallet providers can help with distribution and availability across channels. The biggest question here will be which information banks are comfortable sharing with their (to-be) partners. As the chart below shows, KYC information reigns supreme here.

What kind of data does or will your bank consider providing to other parties in the future, assuming a liability scheme that meets your risk appetite?

What will the Digital Identity Wallet model look like?

For digital wallets, models can be simplified to have two main entities: the Relying Party (RP) and the Identity Provider (IDP). In this case, the RP pays a certain transaction fee that is shared by IDPs, allowing network operators to recover the investment, operational and governance costs of the system. While models vary, it is unlikely that end-consumers will have to pay any costs for this process. 

What do you see as the ideal technical identity network infrastructure operating model?
What is the most important specific use case in a banking context that can benefit from Digital Identity Wallet?

There are a few things that need hammering out before Digital Identity Wallets can go mainstream. For example, most survey respondents see the identity network operating model to be a marriage of public and private infrastructures. However, others would prefer separate models that have interoperability at every level of the stack. Notably, no survey respondents show confidence in a completely public infrastructure. 

The ethos to build upon

Digital Identity Wallets should be built responsibly and with clearly identified guiding principles in mind. The picture below summarizes these concerns.

Digital Identity Wallet Ethos

Due to the sensitive nature of this technology, it is important that human-centered design is at the heart of emerging applications and products. Unless this is made a priority, new products may fail to connect with less digitally-savvy customers and may even limit wide adoption. 

Similarly, because of the proximity this technology has with people’s identity and personally Identifiable Information (PII), it is important that each data point is collected after strict considerations of consent and privacy are made. These tenets also follow from data minimization, which can ensure that only the requisite data is shared and stored, reducing the risk of abuse or misuse of data.

0 comments on “66% of Americans expect to have a Digital Identity Wallet by 2023”


Introducing Card Launching 101 + Guide

  • Launching a card has become a core part of banks' and fintechs' product strategy.
  • In Tearsheet's new Card Launching 101 guide, we speak to some of the best in the industry about what it takes to launch a successful program.
Tearsheet Editors | October 03, 2023

Wading into new waters: Microsoft launches Xbox-centric Mastercard

  • Microsoft launched an Xbox Mastercard last week exclusively for US users enrolled in the Xbox Insider program.
  • But, Xbox could have done better by adding newer options to the card in terms of the application process, accessibility, and loyalty points.
Sara Khairi | September 26, 2023

TikTok and payments, a match made on social media

  • Gen Z’s popular haunt TikTok is abuzz with payments activity, surpassing $1 billion in global consumer spending through in-app purchases in Q1 2023.
  • TikTok is looking to make a name for itself in the retail space in America as well, as it battles with the White House over concerns about its Chinese origins.
Rabab Ahsan | September 20, 2023
Banking, Payments

Banks can offer speed and convenience as Wise and Swift integrate cross-border payment networks

  • Swift and Wise partner for streamlined cross-border payments, benefiting banks and their customers.
  • The Wise Platform will utilize Swift's capabilities, including cloud and API connectivity, enhancing international payments for FIs with features like payment status tracking and end-to-end visibility.
Zachary Miller | September 20, 2023

Digital shopping can benefit from the creator economy

  • Despite the proliferation of online shopping, 65% consumers still prefer to shop in brick-and-mortar stores.
  • For consumers one of the major reasons to stick to in-person shopping is their ability to try on products and test them.
Rabab Ahsan | September 19, 2023
More Articles