Member Exclusive

Robinhood says yes to regulators and no to gamification

  • Robinhood has agreed to pay a $7.5 million fine and change its practices to settle Massachusetts' securities regulators' claim that the firm led inexperienced investors to make unsafe investments. 
  • Massachusetts' securities regulators have highlighted a whole list of UX features and UX elements that the firm failed to “reasonably supervise”.
Rabab Ahsan | January 31, 2024
close

Email a Friend

Robinhood says yes to regulators and no to gamification

Robinhood has agreed to pay a $7.5 million fine and change its practices to settle Massachusetts’ securities regulators’ claim that the firm led inexperienced investors to make unsafe investments.

The news: Due to the settlement Robinhood will be doing away with some of its most famous features like emojis as well as “permanently cease the future use of confetti,” the consent order states.

Context: Robinhood’s confetti feature was a UX element that filled the consumers’ screen with a shower of confetti every time they made a trade or achieved a milestone like upgrading to Robinhood Gold. Due to regulatory pressure the company discontinued the use of this feature in 2021 and replaced it with more standard graphics.

But the confetti feature isn’t the only part of its UX that the firm will have to do away with due to its settlement. Massachusetts’ securities regulators have highlighted a whole list of features and UX elements that the firm failed to “reasonably supervise”:

subscription wall for TS Pro

0 comments on “Robinhood says yes to regulators and no to gamification”

Member Exclusive, Opinion

Letter from the Editor: The AI productivity story is easy to tell until you sit inside the institution building it

  • Today’s analysis examines the widening gap between the AI capabilities being developed and the language used to describe them.
  • If AI's role is to make banking more efficient, productivity matters. If its role is to redefine decision-making and workflow, productivity may be too narrow a lens.
Sara Khairi | June 12, 2026
AI Innovation, Artificial Intelligence, Member Exclusive, Payments

The real power struggle in agentic commerce isn’t building the smartest AI agents; it’s governing them

  • J.P. Morgan Payments is moving the conversation beyond capability and toward the infrastructure and framework required to govern AI agents.
  • Data is emerging as a core ingredient of agentic commerce, shaping the information agents can access and the decisions they can make.
Sara Khairi | June 11, 2026
Artificial Intelligence, Banking, Member Exclusive

AI, bank CEOs, and the emerging jobpocalypse debate

  • Bank CEOs are publicly framing AI as a tool for workforce augmentation rather than replacement, but their messaging remains inconsistent and often tone-deaf.
  • The real challenge lies in the short term, where displaced workers, underprepared institutions, and vague government-corporate accountability leave millions without a clear path forward.
Rabab Ahsan | June 09, 2026
10-Q, Member Exclusive

SoFi bets the future of finance is fewer handoffs

  • SoFi’s recent moves reflect a broader push to cut down the handoffs between financial products, systems, and decisions.
  • SoFi Coach is the visible layer of a deeper system in which infrastructure generates data, data generates context, and context produces recommendations.
Sara Khairi | June 08, 2026
5 questions, Banking, Member Exclusive

KeyBank’s Jeannie Fanning on the relationship gap in modern banking

  • When efficiency in transaction processing becomes table stakes, what does it mean to truly know a customer?
  • KeyBank's Jeannie Fanning addresses a key question and explains why contextual understanding becomes even more critical as financial services move deeper into automation.
Sara Khairi | June 08, 2026
More Articles