10-Q, Member Exclusive

‘In health but not in sickness’: Wells Fargo might be having second thoughts about its partnership with Bilt

  • Wells Fargo and Bilt's partnership over the co-branded credit cards appears to be teetering on the brink of trouble.
  • The scenario is seemingly advantageous for the other two parties involved — Bilt and consumers — but less so for Wells Fargo, which naturally aimed to gain more than it stood to lose.
close

Email a Friend

    Is it really a win-win together?

    Like marriage, partnerships can either strengthen or weaken a bond. In fact, Will Stredwick, Senior VP and General Manager at Amex Global Network Services North America compares these relationships to dating dynamics, highlighting that trust is fundamental, compatibility is crucial, and strong partnerships last when there is alignment in chemistry and values.

    The good, bad, and ugly partnerships

    Some notable examples of successful bank-fintech partnerships have stood the test of time, such as Goldman Sachs-StripeCiti-IntraFi, and Cross River Bank-Revolut. But others haven’t been as smooth sailing; the Goldman-Apple partnership, for example, has faced more challenges than successes.

    Another partnership formed in 2022 between Wells Fargo and Bilt appears to be teetering on the brink of trouble. Though not apparent on the surface, behind-the-scenes issues are coming to light through damning reports.

    The Wells Fargo and Bilt saga: The evident and underlying realities

    Wells Fargo and Bilt launched a co-branded Mastercard credit card that enables users to pay rent, earn rewards points, and count it toward their credit scores without incurring extra fees from landlords.

    Launched in 2021, the Bilt Rewards loyalty program allows members to earn rewards on activities that typically don’t qualify for rewards, achieving immediate success. Earlier this year, Bilt secured $200 million in funding, increasing its valuation to $3.1 billion from $350 million in 2021, with Wells Fargo, Mastercard, and Blackstone among its financiers.

    Bilt generates nearly $20 billion in annual spending with profitable unit economics. The firm engages with three networks including property owners, local merchants and businesses, and redemption partners. Its earnings are closely tied to the spending and loyalty it cultivates and interchange fees represent just a portion of Bilt’s revenue sources. 

    Although the success of Bilt Rewards and its potential to help Wells Fargo attract new, younger customers likely influenced the bank’s decision to launch the co-branded credit card, the results have not aligned with the bank’s expectations. Despite bringing a novel feature to the market through the co-branded card, Wells Fargo is losing money on the deal.

    According to the Wall Street Journal, Wells Fargo reportedly faces losses of up to $10 million per month from the program.

    The effectiveness of targeting a new and younger customer base who value reward programs was mixed.

    ….


    subscription wall for TS Pro

    0 comments on “‘In health but not in sickness’: Wells Fargo might be having second thoughts about its partnership with Bilt”

    Member Exclusive, Opinion

    Letter from the Editor: Financial services have always relied on one thing. AI is taking it away.

    • As AI agents assume more responsibility for commerce, the transaction remains visible, but the decision-making behind it becomes increasingly opaque.
    • Financial services are reconstructing the decision trail AI has hidden. That's why the industry's conversation increasingly revolves around intent, context, governance, permissions, explainability, and accountability.
    Sara Khairi | July 10, 2026
    AI Innovation, Member Exclusive, Payments

    Paper still defines payments’ last mile. J.P. Morgan Payments thinks AI and robotics can tackle that.

    • Most payment discussions assume the biggest challenge is moving money from Point A to Point B. What if the bigger bottleneck is actually the operational noise surrounding the payment?
    • Investing in checks sounds like a step backward, but J.P. Morgan Payments is doing exactly that – because paper checks still create the greatest operational friction in the modern financial system.
    Sara Khairi | July 09, 2026
    Banking, Business of Fintech, Member Exclusive

    Revolut’s US bet: A bank charter, a stablecoin pitch, and a graveyard of European challengers that tried before it

    • Revolut filed for a US national bank charter in March 2026 to break free from its partner-bank arrangement.
    • The firm is betting on stablecoins and cross-border/multi-currency banking to win over international-minded US customers, backed by a $500 million commitment and a buildout led by new US CEO Cetin Duransoy.
    Rabab Ahsan | July 07, 2026
    AI Innovation, BNPL, Member Exclusive

    Why BNPL infrastructure needs to learn a new acronym: KYA (Know Your Agent)

    • As AI agents take a larger role in commerce, BNPL providers may need to rethink whom or what they evaluate when approving transactions.
    • Zip Co's Rory Herriman believes a future payments ecosystem may need to prove that an agent had authority to act, but also that the action reasonably reflected the user's objectives.
    Sara Khairi | July 02, 2026
    Member Exclusive, Podcasts

    Trust, stablecoins, and the AI margin squeeze: What McKinsey and QED’s fintech report means for banks

    • Max Flötotto, who leads McKinsey’s global retail banking practice, and Mike Packer, a partner at QED Investors, just co-authored a report mapping where fintech goes next — and they agree on almost everything in it.
    • We dig into why “a feature is no longer a fintech,” why only 1% of stablecoin volume is actual end-user payments, and why the simplest version of banking — deposits and loans — may be the part most at risk from AI agents.
    Zack Miller | July 01, 2026
    More Articles