Why one VC is bullish on ICOs

In the past three months, companies have raised more than $300 million, not through venture investors or banks, but from token sales, also known as initial coin offerings.

Venture capital has become synonymous with innovation and wealth creation over the last half century. Today, corporate VCs (established corporations that with dedicated funds for external startup companies) are on the rise; the number of active corporate VCs per quarter more than doubled between 2012 and 2016, according to CB Insights. Enthusiasts of token sales are optimistic that they can unseat venture capitalists, as an investment vehicle that removes the need for the middle man and provides more liquidity.

The VCs themselves haven’t shown much concern over that idea (it may be too early for that). If anything, some are looking beyond that detail at all the possibility for innovation.

“It’s much like you agreeing to pay in advance a two-year subscription to the Wall Street Journal or New York Times,” said Ryan Gilbert, partner and founder of Propel Venture Partners, the BBVA Ventures spinoff that launched as its own LLC last year, at the Tearsheet Money Conference this week. “The subscriptions we used to know are the coin offerings of today.”

Of course, it’s not clear if the tokens sold constitute securities. The Securities and Exchange Commission hasn’t issued any formal guidance on tokens as securities and regulators tend to take a do-no-harm approach to new business concepts and technologies that haven’t proved harmful.

“Yes, what’s happening today might be controversial,” Gilbert said. “But when regulators learn more about what’s truly happening, they’ll recognize… what’s going to help deliver financial services to everyone at the lowest possible price, how are we going to truly have transparency, is knowing both where a transaction starts and ends and what the true costs are going to be.”

Gilbert’s stance reflects a growing interest in public blockchains by bank executives as well. A Cognizant survey released this week of 1,520 executives from 578 financial services firms shows 86 percent see public blockchains becoming more prominent in the next five years; 80% said the same about private blockchains.

In the original bitcoin blockchain, transactions are recorded on a public ledger anyone can see, although users are pseudonymous, identifiable only by alphanumeric addresses. That doesn’t mesh well with the need for privacy in high-stakes transactions between massive companies, which is why banks — which were initially hostile have sought “permissioned” blockchain-like solutions that allow for more privacy in terms of how data is stored and who can access it.

At least two of Propel’s portfolio companies have raised money through token sales. For example, the blockchain-based digital advertising system Brave “managed to raise $24 million in about 29 seconds,” Gilbert said.

In financial services, the token sale opportunity could perhaps manifest in payments, through a bank transfer service that uses these types of tokens as a means of compensation.

It’s hard for the everyday person to justify paying $17 to wire $100 from the U.S. to Mexico, especially when the cost of that wire probably looks more like 75 cents. But using these kinds of tokens, the supply and demand sides can come together to “dictate the true price of that token for the value exchange… whether that payout point at Guadalajara or Mexico City actually has that cash from the sales of the day to disperse to you as a recipient.”

Other investors are more cautious. Mike Sigal, a partner at 500 Startups, didn’t comment on his investments but noted that one of the hardest things for an early stage company to do is acquire customers and activate the entrepreneur’s community, and that a token sale could be a tool for it to truly get its community engaged, speaking at the Bloomberg Bloomberg Buy-Side Week Focus on Fintech event this week. For Citi Ventures, they’re still a solution in search of a problem. Arvind Purushotham, the group’s co-head, said it looks at blockchain investments with direct applicability to its business. It’s an investor in Chain, but hasn’t made any cryptocurrency investments.

The early-stage fund Future\Perfect Ventures has several portfolio companies now planning ICOs, said Jalak Jobanputra, its founder and managing partner. But it’s a Wild West, and it’s unclear whether these token sales have real technology behind them or if it’s just a quick way to make money and take advantage of momentum, she explained.

“There will be something really lasting out of this but there will be a lot of catches in the process,” she said. Tokens related to the business are one element of it but some companies want to raise just to have a capital raise. You really have to dig in and see what you’re going to own… It would be dangerous for these companies if there was immediate liquidity or lack of liquidity. All of those terms are up in the air right now.”

Mobile wallet fundraising to drop 73 percent this year: report

Even though it’s not clear who will “win” mobile payments or which players are here to stay, new data shows latecomers and nonessential players are floating into the periphery while the dominant players prepare for the future.

Fundraising for mobile wallet startups is on track to fall 73 percent in 2017 on a year-over-year basis, according to research released Monday from PwC’s financial technology strategy consulting platform, DeNovo. That figure should be taken as a sign of industry consolidation as well as preparation for a post-app world, said Michael Landau, fintech payments lead at PwC.

“Apps are the way to reach consumers in a mobile environment today, but how long will it be until apps aren’t the best way to reach them?” he said. “How many years will it take for the U.S. to adapt to the WeChat strategy like they have in China?”

The consulting and auditing giant shared the statistic as a single data point, one born of a wealth of data it has collected and analyzed in its proprietary intelligence platform. DeNovo does not cover public entities and the mobile wallets assessed aren’t particularly well-funded or well established.

Landau noted that the number of apps that people download has been falling, while pointing at a 2015 survey which taught the world that although people use an average of 24 apps each month, they spend 80 percent of their time in the same five.

“Consumers are really only really using a few apps at any given time so you have to make any app extremely valuable,” he said. “What is critically important regardless of context is authentication.”

Banks and startups alike are responding to that need to differentiate by investing in biometric authentication, which allows users to verify their identity when confirming a payments transaction or logging into their mobile banking apps, for example, by using their unique physical traits instead of a password from memory. Today, fingerprint authentication is most common, but many financial firms are closely studying eye, face, palm and voice recognition as well.

“It feels futuristic but the idea is any mobile wallet strategy needs to prepare for rapidly changing contexts in how they reach consumers,” Landau said.

The state of fintech funding, in five charts

Investment in financial technology may have fallen a spectacular 47 percent last year but it is perhaps just an indication of the maturation of the industry.

Total global funding to fintech companies fell to 47.2 percent to $24.7 billion in 2016 from $46.7 billion the year before, according to KPMG’s quarterly fintech funding report, The Pulse of Fintech, which came out in February 23. Deal activity dropped to 1,076 from 1,255 the year before.

“The appetite for fintech investment is strong and will remain so for the foreseeable future,” said Steven Ehrlich, lead analyst for emerging technologies at Spitzberg Partners. “However, things are certainly not as frothy as they used to be, especially for the early stage companies.”

That’s largely due to investors’ renewed focus on business models and plans for profitability, Ehrlich said. And as always, regulation. “Startups are realizing that they cannot skirt those requirements and financial institutions are working to make sure that everyone is playing by the same set of rules.”

Below is a breakdown of who’s funding fintech activity on a global level today.

VC deal volume is down, but dollar value keeps growing
The number of venture capital deals fell to 1,436 last year from 1,617 in 2015. However, those deals continued to increase in value, rising to $17.35 billion globally in VC investment from $15.64 billion the year before.

Chris Hughes, vice president at Revolution Growth, the growth-stage investment arm of venture capital firm Revolution, said growth slowed following 2014 and 2015 markets, two fast growing years for fintech VC funding, when the industry’s most exciting companies, marketplace lenders Lending Club and OnDeck, had trouble growing and reaching profitability. As a result, “public market investors started to reprice these companies based on their performance relative to their traditional peers and monitor metrics like net interest margin, return on equity and profitability,” he said.

Ehrlich said after getting early returns from the Lending Clubs of the industry, many began realizing how difficult it really is to unseat legacy financial companies.

“In the lending space it may have been easier to offer attractive returns on products when rates were at historical lows, but now that they are rising again it the burden is being placed on them to demonstrate significant value over the incumbents, which is difficult to do,” he said.

Early stage deals are down, late stage deals are up
According to CB Insights, seed investments fell to 29 percent at the end of 2016 from 35 percent the year before, while Series D investments rose to 7 percent, showing that while investment volume is still larger among younger companies, interest in those startups slipped over the last year while interest in more established, developed companies grew.

Private equity is emerging as an additional source of fintech investment
The value of private equity deals in fintech fell by about $7 billion between 2015 and 2016, but deal volume rose to 112 from 99. PE firms have been investing in technology in general, according to KPMG, “so it comes as little surprise that many are targeting businesses within the fintech space.” These companies have been hard-pressed to find worthwhile investment opportunities and as they broaden their deal-sourcing strategies, “those with financial services and technology portfolios may be dialing up activity,” according to the report.

Corporates and startups are more open to working together
Banks and startups are starting to work together more aggressively this year, as evidenced by JPMorgan Chase’s partnership with OnDeck Capital or the Wells Fargo partnership with robo-advisory SigFig. The venture arms of financial institutions increased their participation in fintech startup investment to $8.5 billion (17 percent of deals) in 2016 from $4.9 billion (14 percent of deals) the year before.

Corporates backed 29 percent of VC-backed fintech companies last year, up from 23 percent in the previous year.

“There is a shift where the fintech startups and established firms are realizing that they can have symbiotic relationship,” Ehrlich said. “It is challenging for [banks] to innovate themselves because it requires beating back entrenched and established processes that often times have their own internal challenges.”

Is debt financing the new big equity round in fintech?

After months of reading about hefty equity rounds, financing trends in fintech may be changing. Klarna, a leading European payments upstart, said on Monday that it had raised 300 million crowns (it’s based in Sweden). The firm is, after all, a major player in Europe, handling about 10 percent of all online transactions, according to Reuters. But, perhaps a sign of the changing tide in startup land, instead of a big splashy equity financing, this one was done as debt.

“Klarna is picking up speed in year-on-year revenue growth because of success of recent product launches and markets expansion,” said Jesper Wigardt, Klarna’s PR manager, in an email to Tradestreaming. “We issued the inaugural capital market loan in order to diversify funding sources and to strengthen the capital base to support continued accelerated global growth.”

Why use debt when you can use equity?

This was Klarna’s first time dipping into debt markets, but other top private technology firms have turned away from equity to finance their operations. Earlier in June, Airbnb announced it had raised $1 billion in debt financing. Though the hospitality marketplace still has $2 billion banked, it turned to straight debt financing to add to its coffers.

For fintech firms, using straight debt is generally a new phenomenon. Up and coming financial technology firms have a variety of financing options and straight debt may prove to be a smart financial move.

“If a company is growing rapidly, and has sufficient cash flow, debt can be a more cost effective financing tool than giving up large percentages of equity,” remarked Kyle Zasky, a partner in fintech merchant bank, SenaHill Partners.

Private fintech firms don’t normally turn to debt markets

Private technology firms are accustomed to using various forms of debt to scale up. The most common, convertible debt, enables a young, upwardly mobile firm to raise money quickly without having to quibble over early-stage valuations. Using convertible debt, which turns into equity at a later financing round, startups and their investors can kick the valuation can down the road to a later-stage investor to set after the company has matured somewhat.

Transportation-on-demand leader, Uber, used convertible debt earlier this year when it closed a $1.6 billion investment round. According to Bloomberg, Uber’s bond, which was sold to Goldman Sachs clients, is a six-year bond and converts into equity at a 20 percent to 30 percent discount to Uber’s valuation at the time of an initial public offering. Convertible debt typically pays a coupon but the intention for all involved is that the debt eventually converts into equity. Facebook raised billions of dollars in convertible debt shortly before its IPO. Big banks frequently use access to late-stage, pre-IPO convertible debt as a way to let favored clients into hot companies at preferential terms when the stock hits public markets.

Online lenders do use debt, but differently

Online lenders have also been using debt to capitalize their businesses. Firms like Affirm, Avant, and Payoff, all which provide online consumer loans and recently closed large investments, use debt facilities to replenish their inventory of cash to loan out to borrowers instead of lending out their own equity. But unlike convertible debt, which is dilutive, these types of fintech investment rounds don’t impact cap tables. Firms like Victory Park Capital, a Chicago-based alternative lender, and other big banks lead large debt rounds for the online lending industry.

“In fintech, there are certain business that lend themselves well to debt, such as lending businesses or companies that just need capital on their balance sheet for regulatory purposes,” said SenaHill’s Zasky.

Using straight debt to finance growing startups isn’t as common, though. Reuters reports that Klarna’s debt comes in the form of 10-year notes with a floating rate based on three-month Swedish interest rate plus 4.5 percent per year, or an initial coupon of about 4 percent.

Klarna claims it’s profitable and Swedish media has reported that the firm fetched a $2.25 billion valuation after Swedish insurer Skandia invested.

So far, Klarna is the first headliner to diversify its funding sources in this way. Time will tell if tapping the debt markets becomes more common and whether it makes its way over to domestic markets, too.

 

Photo credit: markus spiske via Visualhunt / CC BY

Running successful crowdfunding campaigns with Roy Morejon

retirement investing

It may look easy to launch a crowdfunding campaign, raise hundreds of thousands of dollars, and hit your targets…but it ain’t.

The secret behind many of Kickstarter and Indiegogo’s largest and most successful crowdfunding campaigns is that they have professional help behind them.

They hire guys like Command Partners‘ Roy Morejon to run integrated Internet marketing campaigns, outreach with guerilla PR, and produce awesome crowdfunding videos. David and Zack bring Roy on to TWiC to discuss what’s tips and techniques are working for project backers.

In our news roundup, we talk about the growing internatlization of crowdfunding and the Kickstarter Film Festival 2014 in Brooklyn and the rising importance of platform branding in crowdfunding.

Lastly, co-host Zack “Attack” Miller digs deep into his experience producing over 20 crowdfunding videos and takes us through the 5 steps to make a captivating and successful crowdfunding video.

Listen to the FULL Episode

About Roy Morejon

Roy Morejon picRoy is the President of Command Partners, a full service marketing agency focused on crowdfunding.

Resources mentioned in the podcast

Roy Morejon’s Resources