What BlackRock’s Larry Fink thinks about financial technology

blackrock on technology

When the CEO of the largest asset manager talks about technology, you probably want to listen. BlackRock’s Larry Fink invested heavily over the years in the firm’s technology.

The company’s hosted Aladdin platform is used by 20,000 investment professionals around the world. It combines risk analytics with portfolio management, trading and operations tools on a single platform.

“BlackRock’s Aladdin technology connects our global investor community on a common platform,” Fink said on the firm’s Q2 investor conference call. “The scale of our trading and liquidity platform enables us to access market liquidity that few firms can, and we further enhance that scale through the Bank of America Global Capital Management acquisition in the quarter. Our data expertise allows us to turn large, unstructured data sets into meaningful investment insights, and our risk and quantitative analysis teams provide independent oversight to help identify both risk and opportunities.”

BlackRock also acquired software-driven portfolio manager, FutureAdvisor in 2015. It was the first time a major financial services company acquired a roboadvisor. More firms have entered the automated portfolio management space since, including Schwab and Vanguard. Goldman Sachs bought Austin-based Honest Dollar, a firm that focuses on retirement assets.

“We also believe that the evolving technology and regulatory landscape including the new DOL rule in the U.S., digital advice will play an integral role in increasing access and transparency for investors,” he said. “And we continue to see strong client interest in our FutureAdvisor platform, as clients look to new and innovative wealth management solutions. Clients not only turn to BlackRock to manage their assets, but also to help them understand the larger term impact of global events.”

Robos like FutureAdvisor are efficient distribution channels for distributing the firm’s iShares ETFs. LPL Financial is one of the first major financial institutions to use BlackRock’s software for its digital advice platform.

BlackRock makes no bones about its intentions to leverage technology to scale its business. For Fink, financial technology is no longer a differentiator. It’s now required to compete in financial services.

“Technology has always been a core component of our value proposition, and a significant differentiator for BlackRock,” Fink said. “As the investment landscape evolves, technology is transitioning from a competitive advantage to a competitive requirement. Those that do not invest in technology will not be able to meet their clients’ long-term needs. Technology remains a key area of focus and investment for BlackRock across all aspects of our business, to enhance our investment process, to enhance our client service, to create operational efficiencies, and our unifying BlackRock Aladdin technology platform.”

Photo credit

Roboadvisors are automating all types of investments

roboadvisors for all kinds of assets

The excitement around the automation of investment management has been most pronounced for consumers. That’s going to continue, because as technology opens up new opportunities for investors, roboadvisors are popping up there, too.

One area that has seen a flurry of recent activity is the marketplace lending industry. Marketplace lenders are essentially dual-sided marketplaces: firms like LendingClub and Prosper attract people seeking to borrow money and match them to investors of all sorts looking to lend out their capital.

For investors, these platforms are modern-day equivalents to the stock market: each loan on the platform acts as an individual security that can be researched, and portfolios can then be built by managing risk and long term goals.

But unlike the stock market, where roboadvisors primarily buy and hold a mix of ETFs, marketplace roboadvisors must accommodate some interesting nuances. Many investors prefer to continuously monitor their portfolios, reinvesting cash returns into new loans and selling underperforming loans on secondary markets.

Roboadvisors for marketplace lending

Enter the roboadvisors. Technology firms, like LendingRobot, are starting to introduce their own flavor of automation tools and allocation algorithms to marketplace lending investors. An investor can use LendingRobot to monitor the overall “health” of a portfolio, including current returns, forward looking returns, and average times to loan maturity. Roboadvisors can also assist with deploying capital: for example, users can build rules governing an investment strategy using LendingRobot. Using varying-levels of sophistication, roboadvisors can automatically invest and manage marketplace lending portfolios drawing from both primary and secondary markets.

If investors maintain portfolios on multiple platforms, and many do, they need to log in to each platform separately to take care of business. Marketplace lending roboadvisors provide one login environment for investors to manage their funds. LendingRobot recently introduced Dashboard, its new mobile app that gives users the ability to monitor portfolios across multiple platforms like LendingClub, Prosper, and Funding Circle. To be sure, marketplace lenders have honed their own tools to help investors manage loan portfolios, but they don’t typically work with other lending platforms.

Roboadvisors: B2C and B2B

Individuals are choosing roboadvisors to manage their investments because they’re comfortable using automated tools. Lower fees, starting at 20 basis points on assets under management and scaling down, don’t hurt either. Also, many of today’s investors may be happy to avoid professional advisors, who they suspect aren’t always working in their clients’ best interests.

Firms like Betterment and Wealthfront have gotten most of the limelight in this sector, but there are numerous other players muscling in to get their share of wallet. While the roboadvisors’ AUM shouldn’t have any of the large asset managers worried quite yet (it totals tens of billions of dollars at this point), the wider industry is definitely taking notice. Firms like Vanguard and Schwab have launched their own versions of these automated (or at least, semi-automated) platforms for their clients, while other firms, like BlackRock, have decided to buy their way into roboadvice (BlackRock purchased FutureAdvisor in August, 2015).

There’s a lot going on in automation-ville that’s impacting the lives of investment professionals, too. Take FutureAdvisor, for example: BlackRock doesn’t intend to roll out its new roboadvisor directly to clients. Instead, the asset manager intends to have its in-house advisors automate parts of their clients’ portfolios. Betterment and Wealthfront, for their part, offer institutional programs to get advisors up and running using their platforms. There are also private-label roboadvisors for advisors, like Vanare, competing to arm more RIAs with their own automated offerings.

Envestnet getting in on roboadvisory

Having made eight acquisitions in the past five years, Envestnet has embarked on building a tech platform for advisors that incorporates both advisor- and customer-facing services. Fresh off buying account aggregator Yodlee for around $600 million in August of 2015, Envestnet has created a new service that equips advisors with their own roboadvisor. Called Advisor Now, the recently-unveiled offering is another step the publicly-traded financial technology firm has taken to support independent investment advisors with technology services.

“The future of the roboadvisor movement isn’t going to be stand alone robos, it’s going to be a blend of a digital movement,” Jay Hummel, SVP of Advisory Services, said during a recent demo of the new product. “We believe the future is these institutions’ being able to blend this digital movement to be able to serve a 20-year-old millennial on the exact same platform that they can serve the 70-year old retiree that’s looking for the relationship with a full human advisor. That one platform is what we call Advisor Now.”

12 most mindblowing acquisitions in recent history

ey on asian fintech, jan bellens

Interesting discussion going on at 12Most regarding the most mindblowing acquisitions in history.

Obviously, the fervor around Facebook’s intention to buy photo app, Instagram for $1B prompted this list but I thought it would be a good time to get your feedback into what you think were the most influential mergers in the financial space.

To get things started, I added the $15 billion BlackRock-Barclays Global (BGI) merger which essentially made BlackRock the largest asset manager on the planet but also gave them the crown jewel in the ETF space, which just keeps growing like a weed.

What do you think are notable mergers in our space?

Vote or add your picks below:

Stock markets continue to lose share to private exchanges

Institutional investors with large blocks of shares to sell don’t just open up an account at E*Trade and dump them into the market.  Doing so tips their hands and astute short sellers can hop a ride on stocks being disposed, making money along the way and reducing profits for the institutional seller.

Conversely, if an institution wants to accumulate shares in a relatively thinly traded stock, they can’t go out to a retail stock broker and say, “Hey buddy, get me 10 million shares of that hot new small cap tech stock.”  Doing so would cause the price to rise just by announcing such intentions.

How Institutional Investors Trade

To handle insitutional volumes of stock trading, traders do the following

  1. VWAP: Some traders will program trading software to purchase a maximum % of volume on given days (called VWAP or Volume Weighted Average Price).
  2. Smaller trades at various brokers: Sometimes traders will parcel out trades to multiple brokers to mask the fact that a large number of shares are being traded by one institution.
  3. Dark pools: And sometimes, when there is really an impetus to sell/buy a large chunk of stock, traders will go to their brokers and ask them to cross a block of shares on the low — by not going too public with the info.  Execution speed is paramount here and the action is as much in the data centers in New Jersey as it is on Wall Street.  These dark pools now account for 1 in 3 shares of stocks traded according to the Wall Street Journal.

In ‘Dark Pools’ Pick up Stock Trading Share, the WSJ takes aim at the rise in these dark pools.

The rise of so-called dark pools and other off-exchange strategies aimed at large banks and institutional traders comes as regulators on both sides of the Atlantic grapple with balancing the market efficiencies the alternative venues say they generate with the impact on individual investors.

Private venues are seen as a more efficient way for transacting large chunks of shares, but critics worry that if so much trading is done privately, publicly available prices set by exchanges will become less accurate. Dark pools are electronic platforms designed for institutions to carry out major stock trades anonymously.

Varying forces

Having 30% of trading beyond the veil of regulators and common investors creates a tiered trading system, something inherently seen as unfair and anti-competitive.  The emergence of internal stock trading platforms like powerhouse BlackRock recently announced are not new, they’re just taking on more volume and therefore, importance.  In general, we’re witnessing the rise of the machines and algorithmic trading which is the purest combination of technology and investing.  The stock exchanges like NASDAQ OMX ($NDAQ) and NYSE Euronext ($NYX) are pleading and crying to regulators to help right this wrong.

Beyond the histrionics, the stock exchanges are also developing technology to help lure institutions back to their platforms.  The NASDAQ OMX CEO was on Forbes recently touting the work they’ve done on PSX, an exchange that doesn’t give preference only to speed but also to size of trades.  This platform has already demonstrated its ability to bring many of the institutional trades happening offline, back online.

As Felix Salmon said in Wired, “In the wake of the flash crash, Mary Schapiro, chair of the Securities and Exchange Commission, publicly mused that humans may need to wrest some control back from the machines.”

‘Automated trading systems will follow their coded logic regardless of outcome while human involvement likely would have prevented these orders from executing at absurd prices.’

Giving up control to the computers is not really what’s at stake here.  Computer trading just reflects the rules-based logic entered by the humans who program the algos.  Rather, it’s the essential bifurcation of the markets: one for pros and one for the rest of us.  It’s the unleveling of the playing field at stake here that should have everyone concerned.

Source:

Dark Pools Pick up Stock Trading Share (WSJ)

Algorithms take control of Wall Street (Wired)

BlackRock to launch trading platform (FT.com)

photo courtesy of tenaciousme