Green Finance

Transparency is important but not enough for a greener financial system

  • Despite being an important step, transparency around climate impacts is not enough to push investments in the green sector.
  • The financial sector needs support to create a stronger ecosystem of environmentally friendly assets that can absorb large amounts of capital.
close

Email a Friend

Transparency is important but not enough for a greener financial system

The financial sector is facing increasing pressure to reduce its support for the carbon-intensive sector, with banks’ lending practices getting more attention. 

The main response from government bodies and regulators is to upgrade financial disclosure requirements to include climate risks and impacts. This aims to increase investors’ responsibility by making them report on the climate impacts of their investment portfolios. 

However, the problem is much larger and more complex to solve than just shining a light on current practices. 

While enhanced disclosures are an important step towards a sustainable economy, they are insufficient to fuel a mass diversion of capital towards the clean energy sector given the current financial system’s infrastructure. The idea that once we can see where the money is going, we can redirect it to sustainable portfolios may not be entirely feasible. 

Even in today’s opaque environment there is increasing uncertainty over the future demand for fossil fuel investments, while appetite is growing for companies with long-term sustainability goals. The ESG market has grown rapidly, with a third of the total $1.5 trillion global green bond market issued just this year, according to the Climate Bonds Initiative.

However, the issue with moving capital away from fossil fuels and towards clean energy is that the green investments market is still relatively small with low liquidity. 

Fossil fuels represent a long-standing and highly consolidated industry, having taken in large and stable investments over the past few decades. Only in the five years after the Paris Agreement, it’s been estimated that 60 of the world’s largest commercial and investment banks have collectively invested $3.8 trillion into fossil fuels.

In contrast, the renewable sector is young and fragmented. Despite its rapid growth over the past decade, it’s still characterized by many small participants, often operating in only one market. This results in lower revenues and market capitalization, limiting renewables’ ability to attract investment. 

SPONSOR

The green investment arena is simply not big enough to absorb the capital that needs to be diverted away from industries that damage the environment. 

And even if it were, switching from one to the other is not a clear cut environmentally friendly play. There are issues to be considered around the impact of divesting from fossil fuel industries. Even if an investment fund sells its ‘dirty’ assets, someone is purchasing it on the other end – could be a buyer with lower sustainability targets or who doesn’t have to be as transparent about their investments.   

Therefore, a downside of increased transparency for regulated entities could be that ownership will simply move away from public view, which is not necessarily a long-term, sustainable strategy.  

Moreover, the growing market for environmental investments is currently unregulated. Ratings agencies such as S&P Global or Morningstar issue “green” ratings on stocks and bonds, but these come without any regulatory checks. 

This problem is only now being addressed by the International Organization of Securities Commissions, which includes watchdogs from the US, Europe, Asia and Latin America. The organization recently issued some recommendations for its members in an effort to shine light on how ESG ratings are compiled and help combat greenwashing. 

But governments and regulatory bodies have a bigger part to play beyond regulating disclosures requirements and ratings. Climate and energy policy design should consider innovation in low-carbon financing and investor preferences, including their levels of risk appetite and available capital, to create a stronger ecosystem for green assets.

Overall, perhaps the bigger focus should be on expanding the financial sector and bringing clean energy investing into the mainstream. If sustainable portfolios become more attractive to investors, capital will follow. 

0 comments on “Transparency is important but not enough for a greener financial system”

Outlier OpinionsMakers

Green Finance, The Green Finance Podcast

The Green Finance Podcast Ep. 14: COP27 – is finance ready to move from pledges to implementation?

  • COP27 ended around a week ago, and by now we've all probably seen the headlines – an agreement was finally reached to create a loss and damage fund. But what about GFANZ?
  • To help us get a better sense of what happened at the conference, today we're chatting with Lubomila Jordanova, the founder and CEO of PlanA.
Iulia Ciutina | November 30, 2022
Green Finance, Member Exclusive

Green Finance Briefing: The stroll to zero – finance has a long way to go

  • At COP27, there were no commitments to phase down or reduce fossil fuel use in the final overarching deal, and there was no breakthrough in the rules of finance either.
  • GFANZ faces a serious question: what is the purpose of a net-zero alliance when members are allowed to continue investing in fossil fuel expansion?
Iulia Ciutina | November 30, 2022
Green Finance, Where Credit's Due Podcast

The Green Finance Podcast Ep. 13: Debunking carbon credits and voluntary carbon markets, with BeZero Carbon CEO Tommy Ricketts

  • We need more funds to flow towards climate solutions, and carbon markets can facilitate this by creating investable carbon assets. But we need to ensure that carbon credits are of the highest quality and that they are used mindfully.
  • My guest today is Tommy Ricketts, CEO of BeZero Carbon, a company that provides carbon credit ratings and research tools to support buyers, intermediaries, investors, and carbon project developers.
Iulia Ciutina | November 11, 2022
Green Finance, Member Exclusive

Green Finance Briefing: COP27 moves the conversation from pledges to implementation

  • As the COP27 climate conference unfolds, the narrative is moving from pledges towards implementation – all eyes are on the developed world to take the lead and finance the transition.
  • While the financial sector took center stage at COP26, now it is being pressured to build upon the pledges made last year and start its journey to decarbonize lending and investment operations.
Iulia Ciutina | November 11, 2022
Green Finance, Member Exclusive, Modern Marketing

Green Finance Briefing: Marketing sustainability efforts is a tricky game for banks

  • The image banks sell to the end customer on the subject of climate change will come under close scrutiny from consumers and regulators, given their current reputation.
  • Elsewhere, we look at which climate tech sectors attracted the most capital in H1 2022, and who took the lion's share in the US.
Iulia Ciutina | October 28, 2022
More Articles