Green Finance

Transparency is important but not enough for a greener financial system

  • Despite being an important step, transparency around climate impacts is not enough to push investments in the green sector.
  • The financial sector needs support to create a stronger ecosystem of environmentally friendly assets that can absorb large amounts of capital.
close

Email a Friend

Transparency is important but not enough for a greener financial system

The financial sector is facing increasing pressure to reduce its support for the carbon-intensive sector, with banks’ lending practices getting more attention. 

The main response from government bodies and regulators is to upgrade financial disclosure requirements to include climate risks and impacts. This aims to increase investors’ responsibility by making them report on the climate impacts of their investment portfolios. 

However, the problem is much larger and more complex to solve than just shining a light on current practices. 

While enhanced disclosures are an important step towards a sustainable economy, they are insufficient to fuel a mass diversion of capital towards the clean energy sector given the current financial system’s infrastructure. The idea that once we can see where the money is going, we can redirect it to sustainable portfolios may not be entirely feasible. 

Even in today’s opaque environment there is increasing uncertainty over the future demand for fossil fuel investments, while appetite is growing for companies with long-term sustainability goals. The ESG market has grown rapidly, with a third of the total $1.5 trillion global green bond market issued just this year, according to the Climate Bonds Initiative.

However, the issue with moving capital away from fossil fuels and towards clean energy is that the green investments market is still relatively small with low liquidity. 

Fossil fuels represent a long-standing and highly consolidated industry, having taken in large and stable investments over the past few decades. Only in the five years after the Paris Agreement, it’s been estimated that 60 of the world’s largest commercial and investment banks have collectively invested $3.8 trillion into fossil fuels.

In contrast, the renewable sector is young and fragmented. Despite its rapid growth over the past decade, it’s still characterized by many small participants, often operating in only one market. This results in lower revenues and market capitalization, limiting renewables’ ability to attract investment. 

SPONSOR

The green investment arena is simply not big enough to absorb the capital that needs to be diverted away from industries that damage the environment. 

And even if it were, switching from one to the other is not a clear cut environmentally friendly play. There are issues to be considered around the impact of divesting from fossil fuel industries. Even if an investment fund sells its ‘dirty’ assets, someone is purchasing it on the other end - could be a buyer with lower sustainability targets or who doesn’t have to be as transparent about their investments.   

Therefore, a downside of increased transparency for regulated entities could be that ownership will simply move away from public view, which is not necessarily a long-term, sustainable strategy.  

Moreover, the growing market for environmental investments is currently unregulated. Ratings agencies such as S&P Global or Morningstar issue “green” ratings on stocks and bonds, but these come without any regulatory checks. 

This problem is only now being addressed by the International Organization of Securities Commissions, which includes watchdogs from the US, Europe, Asia and Latin America. The organization recently issued some recommendations for its members in an effort to shine light on how ESG ratings are compiled and help combat greenwashing. 

But governments and regulatory bodies have a bigger part to play beyond regulating disclosures requirements and ratings. Climate and energy policy design should consider innovation in low-carbon financing and investor preferences, including their levels of risk appetite and available capital, to create a stronger ecosystem for green assets.

Overall, perhaps the bigger focus should be on expanding the financial sector and bringing clean energy investing into the mainstream. If sustainable portfolios become more attractive to investors, capital will follow. 

0 comments on “Transparency is important but not enough for a greener financial system”

Outlier OpinionsMakers

Green Finance

A Klarna case study: Sustainability as a business value and as a value for business

  • Consumer products actively contribute to climate change, and ecommerce companies are playing their own role in worsening the climate.
  • Klarna isn't turning a blind eye to its corporate responsibilities, encouraging conscious buying which underscores its efforts to combat climate change.
Rabab Ahsan | September 26, 2023
Green Finance

Carbon credits have potential…. and potential problems

  • At our current of emissions we will surpass our carbon emission limits within the decade.
  • Banks have a crucial role to play in this emerging industry of carbon offsets, but there are rising concerns about efficacy and transparency in this nascent space.
Rabab Ahsan | August 21, 2023
Green Finance

Most consumers are willing to pay more for green finance products, but banks can’t differentiate them

  • Consumers are willing to put money where their convictions are when it comes to combatting the climate crisis.
  • However, limited understanding of product offerings and inability to differentiate in green financial products may be leading to an intention-action gap.
Rabab Ahsan | May 03, 2023
Green Finance

Doconomy acquires fellow Swedish fintech Dreams

  • Doconomy, a Swedish carbon data company that helps brands and consumers measure, understand, and reduce their carbon footprint - announced its acquisition of Dreams Technology.
  • The company plans to create a great digital experience that promotes financial wellbeing, encourages sustainable consumption choices and effectuates climate action at scale.
Iulia Ciutina | February 28, 2023
Green Finance, Member Exclusive

Tearsheet Briefing: ESG is at a crossroads

  • The role of finance and ESG in the battle against climate change is turning into a heated discussion across the political spectrum, with both parties aiming to encode their own agenda into law.
  • As the lines are being drawn, one thing is for sure - 2023 will bring a new wave of climate disclosures and regulation.
Iulia Ciutina | February 17, 2023
More Articles