Blockchain and Crypto, Member Exclusive

4 charts on Bitcoin’s environmental impact

  • Bitcoin has a controversial relationship with the environment.
  • Here are four charts depicting Bitcoin’s energy consumption and environmental impact.

Email a Friend

4 charts on Bitcoin’s environmental impact

As the market value of Bitcoin has recently shot up, so has the need for the electric power required to run it. This is primarily due to Bitcoin mining, which involves extensive use of heavy computing power to verify the hundreds of thousands of daily Bitcoin transactions.

And as the world’s most popular cryptocurrency garners increased public attention, many investors, media outlets and critics are raising concerns about its high energy consumption and potential negative impact on the environment.

Bitcoin’s annual energy consumption in terawatt-hours (TWh)

bitcoin energy usage

Source: BBC

It’s not easy to accurately determine Bitcoin’s energy consumption because of the complex nature of the calculations involved. However, estimates suggest that in the beginning of 2017, Bitcoin was using 6.6 terawatt-hours of power a year. By October 2020, this figure had increased tenfold to 67 TWh -- enough to support over 6 million U.S. homes.

At present, the Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance estimates that Bitcoin’s total energy consumption lies somewhere between 40 and 437 TWh per year, with a median estimate of around 127 TWh. And it’s likely to continue to grow in the future, unless the value of Bitcoin drops substantially.

Bitcoin now uses more energy than Argentina

bitcoin energy usage

Source: BBC

The CCAF’s estimate of around 127 TWh means that Bitcoin surpasses the yearly power consumption of Argentina, the UAE, the Netherlands, the Philippines, Belgium and Austria. It also means that Bitcoin uses up approximately 0.58% of the entire planet’s electricity.


However, a new report published by CoinDesk titled ‘Does Bitcoin Have an Energy Problem?’ argues that comparing Bitcoin’s energy use to that of whole countries can be misleading, as it ignores the fact that Bitcoin mining energy is distributed among numerous countries as a subset of each country’s total energy use.

Bitcoin mining energy consumption as a percentage of overall consumption

bitcoin energy usage per country

Source: CoinDesk

The report suggests that it may be more useful to look at Bitcoin mining energy consumption as a percentage of each country’s overall energy use. If we examine the world’s top ten countries by energy consumption that have mining operations, Bitcoin does not make up more than 1.29% of any individual country’s consumption.

In the U.S., Bitcoin mining constitutes only 0.23% of total energy use. In comparison, video game consoles use up around 0.25% of total energy, while construction, commercial cooling and ventilation each make up around 2 to 3% of overall energy consumption.

39% of energy spent on PoW mining is from renewable sources

renewable energy with bitcoin

Source: Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance

Proof of Work is a decentralized mechanism that can be used to validate Bitcoin transactions and perform mining operations. While it’s clear that Bitcoin mining is an energy-intensive process, a sizable percentage of this energy comes from renewable sources. A 2020 study by the CCAF shows that 39% of PoW mining energy in 2019 came from hydropower, wind, solar and other renewable energy sources. Moreover, 76% of miners used renewable sources as part of their energy mix.

The CoinDesk report argues that Bitcoin is actually helping to improve some aspects of clean energy capabilities. With the rise in innovative mining techniques, Bitcoin can provide a means to monetize wasted energy and encourage greater investment in clean energy production. Furthermore, with increasing public scrutiny, Bitcoin miners are likely to shift towards even more renewable energy sources in the coming years.

0 comments on “4 charts on Bitcoin’s environmental impact”

Outlier OpinionsMakers

10-Q, Member Exclusive

How Affirm Card plans to kill credit cards

  • How would you dub a card that has the practicality of a debit card with the added functionality of a credit card? That's the Affirm Card.
  • Launched in early 2021, the Affirm Card has been in the spotlight lately. But what led to garnering significant attention now?
Sara Khairi | December 04, 2023
10-Q, Member Exclusive

Robinhood unveils a 5% APY for Gold members, but how will users respond?

  • Robinhood's recent move to challenge traditional banks includes its increased savings offering, a 5.0% APY for Robinhood Gold Members. 
  • The stock trading platform appears to be in a precarious balancing act, grappling with the escalation of deposit strategies while facing a decline in both transactions and monthly active users.
Sara Khairi | November 20, 2023
10-Q, Member Exclusive

Q1’24 affirms Affirm’s upswing in BNPL

  • Affirm's quarterly results indicate that back-to-back enterprise collaborations in conjunction with collective strategies are eventually winning out keeping the firm on course.
  • Going forward the BNPL provider intends to focus on continuing to invest in risk management, technology, and product development.
Sara Khairi | November 13, 2023
10-Q, Member Exclusive

Q3: The PayPal story isn’t over

  • PayPal saw improved earnings in the third quarter compared to the previous one.
  • Chriss answered some of the burning questions and gave a bit more color on what firm assets could require more work to turn around than he thought.
Sara Khairi | November 06, 2023
10-Q, Member Exclusive

Ted Pick is Morgan Stanley’s new leader. Where does it go from here? 

  • The question, 'Who will succeed James Gorman at Morgan Stanley?', that echoed in Wall Street's nooks and crannies has finally been answered.
  • The present and incoming CEOs might have different management styles. What they both share, however, is a shrinking economy and growing macroeconomic pressures at the time of assuming control.
Sara Khairi | October 30, 2023
More Articles