Banking, Member Exclusive

Postmortem: Did Credit Karma kill Mint or was PFM already on life support?

  • Credit Karma is set to absorb Mint. Are Mint’s final hours harbingers of doom for the personal financial management space? 
  • Dive into our analysis of Mint's final hours to learn more about out whether PFM products are living their final days as useful B2C products.
close

Email a Friend

Postmortem: Did Credit Karma kill Mint or was PFM already on life support?

Intuit has decided to sunset its personal financial management tool Mint, stating that it will “reimagine” the tool as part of Intuit Credit Karma. Are Mint’s final hours harbingers of doom for the personal financial management space? 

Mint and Credit Karma faceoff

Intuit bought Mint in 2009 for $170 million. At the time, the app had 1.5 million users who were collectively keeping tabs on $50 billion in assets and $200 billion in transactions . So far so good, you know, for 2009. But Intuit’s favorite child was yet to enter the scene.

In 2020, Intuit bought Credit Karma for $7.1 billion, at a time when its app had 37 million monthly active users. Now Intuit owned two companies that relied on advertiser expenditure through product referrals.

Fast forward to today, Credit Karma has about 130 million users, and while Mint’s numbers aren’t very clear, it did claim to have 3.6 million monthly active users in 2021. So despite all the interesting ways in which companies manipulate the definition of “user” to buff up their numbers, Mint was a dwarf to Credit Karma’s giant. 

“It’s difficult to understand the full strategy behind the decision without being a fly on the wall in those discussions, but I can say that you don’t spend $7.1 Billion on a business, as it did with Credit Karma, and not give it your full attention,” said fintech product consultant and fintech builder, Jas Shah. 

According to Shah, Mint’s hours were numbered when Intuit launched its Net Worth offering in February this year. 

“It was clear they were going to port Mint customers into Credit Karma and not vice versa. This could have been a decision based on the purchase cost or minimizing customer disruption,” he added. 

But there are hints that this decision had been marinating for a while. For example, in its Q4 2022 earnings, Intuit wrote that it will be reporting Mint and Credit Karma together, and Mint would be effectively subsumed by Credit Karma: “Going forward, we are bringing Mint and Credit Karma together under a unified personal finance strategy. Starting in fiscal Q1, we will be reporting Mint as part of the Credit Karma segment,” read the earnings script. 

Meanwhile Mint has not had a major product update or announcement in years, but Intuit did use the PFM’s team and expertise to build out Credit Karma’s new Net Worth offering.

Mint’s users can migrate to Credit Karma, but it is unclear if the app’s most loved features like the budgeting tools will be migrating.

While Intuit claims that it will continue to evolve Credit Karma, it seems to be in no hurry to offer the budgeting tools that were central to Mint. The reasons behind this may be a sign that personal finance management is dying. 

The ghost of PFM


subscription wall for TS Pro

0 comments on “Postmortem: Did Credit Karma kill Mint or was PFM already on life support?”

Member Exclusive, Opinion

Letter from the Editor: Financial services have always relied on one thing. AI is taking it away.

  • As AI agents assume more responsibility for commerce, the transaction remains visible, but the decision-making behind it becomes increasingly opaque.
  • Financial services are reconstructing the decision trail AI has hidden. That's why the industry's conversation increasingly revolves around intent, context, governance, permissions, explainability, and accountability.
Sara Khairi | July 10, 2026
AI Innovation, Member Exclusive, Payments

Paper still defines payments’ last mile. J.P. Morgan Payments thinks AI and robotics can tackle that.

  • Most payment discussions assume the biggest challenge is moving money from Point A to Point B. What if the bigger bottleneck is actually the operational noise surrounding the payment?
  • Investing in checks sounds like a step backward, but J.P. Morgan Payments is doing exactly that – because paper checks still create the greatest operational friction in the modern financial system.
Sara Khairi | July 09, 2026
Banking, Business of Fintech, Member Exclusive

Revolut’s US bet: A bank charter, a stablecoin pitch, and a graveyard of European challengers that tried before it

  • Revolut filed for a US national bank charter in March 2026 to break free from its partner-bank arrangement.
  • The firm is betting on stablecoins and cross-border/multi-currency banking to win over international-minded US customers, backed by a $500 million commitment and a buildout led by new US CEO Cetin Duransoy.
Rabab Ahsan | July 07, 2026
AI Innovation, BNPL, Member Exclusive

Why BNPL infrastructure needs to learn a new acronym: KYA (Know Your Agent)

  • As AI agents take a larger role in commerce, BNPL providers may need to rethink whom or what they evaluate when approving transactions.
  • Zip Co's Rory Herriman believes a future payments ecosystem may need to prove that an agent had authority to act, but also that the action reasonably reflected the user's objectives.
Sara Khairi | July 02, 2026
Member Exclusive, Podcasts

Trust, stablecoins, and the AI margin squeeze: What McKinsey and QED’s fintech report means for banks

  • Max Flötotto, who leads McKinsey’s global retail banking practice, and Mike Packer, a partner at QED Investors, just co-authored a report mapping where fintech goes next — and they agree on almost everything in it.
  • We dig into why “a feature is no longer a fintech,” why only 1% of stablecoin volume is actual end-user payments, and why the simplest version of banking — deposits and loans — may be the part most at risk from AI agents.
Zack Miller | July 01, 2026
More Articles