Robinhood ramping its free trading app via integrations, global expansion in 2016

fintech top bond trading startups

Robinhood, still the posterboy for helping out the little guy, has traded in his quiver of arrows for some new thinking about how stocks should be bought and sold.  For this current incarnation, the vision isn’t spreading the wealth by stealing riches from the rich, but by enabling everyman to trade stocks and ETFs online with no commissions.  According to Robinhood’s Head of Communications, Jack Randall, “Robinhood launched at the perfect time: distrust in Wall Street had never been higher, mobile usage was rising rapidly, and the brokerage market was ripe for disruption.”

Bringing investment transactions into the age of the Internet

The story of commissions is tied to the history of stock investing: if you had a funded account at a brick and mortar brokerage, you could call your stockbroker who would then place an order through their representative on the trading floor of the appropriate exchange.  In 1988, Ameritrade offered the first touch-tone entry system to place trading orders, and WealthWeb offered the first online trade orders in 1994. Flash forward to 2015: brokerage services like Capital One Investing and Firstrade offer trades with no initial funding requirement and charge $6.95 per trade. “Decades ago, there were large costs associated with executing trades. Tech wasn’t there, it was largely a manual process with people passing order tickets on the floor of the NYSE,” says Randall.  Today, “paying to trade is like paying to send an email. It’s an electronic transaction, and one that consumers should not be paying for.”  

The stated mission of taking “a complex system of regulation, financial institutions, and assets” and making the trading platform “simple, focused, and immediately understandable” seems to be paying off.  Randall says, “The median age of a Robinhood customer is 28 years old. While we’re a wonderful tool for first time investors, 75% of our customers are not first-time investors. Robinhood is simple enough for first-time investors and sophisticated enough for more seasoned investors.  Since we launched publicly in March, we have transacted over $2 billion through our platform. Also, our growth rate makes us the fastest growing brokerage in the world. (This is unique given we launched recently and were only available one one platform – iOS – until August when we launched our Android app.)” 

Integrations key part of Robinhood’s expansion strategy

And it seems like Robinhood’s mission has only just begun.  Since November, the educational investing platform Rubicoin and the crowdsourced hedge fund Quantopian both link with Robinhood accounts.  The popular social trading networks StockTwits and Openfolio now integrate usage of Robinhood directly into their platforms.  Apple just named Robinhood as one of ten apps on their Apple Design Awards for 2015 list.  According to Apple, geolocation, Apple Watch integration and “thoughtful notifications” are key parts of the Robinhood app.  Designed to be the best mobile stock-tracking tool on iOS, Robinhood distinguishes itself with a clean, content-centric design and beautiful typography that nicely balances app branding and iOS design conventions,wrote Apple about the award-winning app.   

“Next year, we will continue to release additional features and explore international expansion,” says Randall. New features in the offing include margin accounts, support for Mint, broker-to-broker transfers, and more expansion of Android support within other apps.  Global expansion plans have kicked off with a $50 million round of funding and an announcement that Australia will be their first overseas market.  

So, even with breakneck speed, cutting edge technology and global plans, how do free transactions equal making money?  According to Randall, “Robinhood generates revenue by accruing interest off of cash balances and collecting interest on margin (margin accounts will be offered next year). It’s worth noting our cost structure is dramatically lower than our peers — no brick-and-mortar branch locations, no legacy technology, no Super Bowl ads. We’re built from the ground-up using the latest technology which allows us to automate where others can’t.” There is also talk of revenue share with apps that integrate their service.

Photo credit: PinkPersimon via VisualHunt / CC BY

Simply invest like a hedge fund — with Mike Kane

andrew hallam

In the world of investing, there’s a lot of excitement around roboadvisors.

These automated and cheap investment platforms, like Wealthfront and Betterment, are attracting billions of dollars.

But, according to Mike Kane, there’s a big problem. Their investment strategies aren’t best of breed and investors will get hammered when markets go south. The CEO of Hedgeable joins Tradestreaming host, Zack Miller to talk about his roboadvisor that uses sophisticated tools — the like employed by hedge funds — to manage retail investor money.

Listen to the FULL episode

About Mike Kane

Hedgeable CEO, Mike KaneMike is the CEO of Hedgeable. He co-founded the company with his twin brother, Matt, and Mike oversees Hedgeable’s investing, strategy, business development, and branding initiatives.

Resources Mentioned In The Podcast

Even More Resources

Betterment vs. Wealthfront, per their CEOs

online investing

There’s a very interesting conversation happening over on Quora about the merits of the two online investing services: Betterment and Wealthfront.which is better

What makes it even more compelling is that it’s being held between the CEOs of the two firms, Jon Stein and Andy Rachleff, respectively.

Betterment’s argument

Stein (Betterment) used the following framework to describe why he thinks Betterment is the better solution:

  1. automation: Users seem to agree that Betterment is better integrated and more fully automated
  2. for serious investors: There’s more personalization available for Betterment users, as you can change your allocation and make trades square away.
  3. integration: Probably related to #1, but Betterment is both a broker and investment advisor, which means everything is branded Betterment, making a smoother ride for clients (Wealthfront uses Interactive Brokers as its brokerage and clients have to contact IB with questions on the actual account).
  4. better deal: lower fees
  5. tuned to behavioral finance: Betterment realizes how poorly most of its users would probably behave so it uses smart defaults to automate decision making.
  6. customization: Instead of just getting a model portfolio like you would at most RIAs, you can tweak things on Betterment to get it just the way you want.

Rachleff (Wealthfront) counters

Andy takes a different approach when sizing the two firms up. Here’s his framework why Wealthfront beats out Betterment.

  1. focus: WF targets young tech employees.
  2. sophistication: WF uses Modern Portfolio Theory (MPT) and therefore, Betterment should return less for every level of risk.
  3. determination of risk: WF uses a 10 question survey to set risk parameters and allocation while Betterment requires you do it yourself.
  4. minimums: $5k minimums at WF and they don’t charge until a client tops up to $25k or more. Betterment charges a subscription fee for small accounts.
  5. fees: it’s interesting to see that both firms feel they’ve got the better model here
  6. transparency: you get an allocation and portfolio recommendations before you open an account with WF, which you can then take and manage yourself. At Betterment, you don’t get rec’s until you open.

Of course, CEOs should behave as beknighted cheerleaders of their firms, so readers should understand where both Jon and Andy are coming from.

But what an awesome world we now live in where CEOs are engaging in the conversation to help users/investors understand which investing platform is right for them.

Read What are the main differences between Betterment and Wealthfront (Quora)

***FYI, I was contacted by Betterment’s Community Manager with the following clarifications:
Betterment is actually founded on modern portfolio theory. As you mentioned, it is intersected with Behavioral Economics so people actually implement the practices of MPT.

Regarding risk – Betterment makes recommendations for allocation based on goal type, time to goal i.e. if saving for retirement in 30 years, I can allocate more to stocks, say 80% stocks, 20% bonds. If saving for a major purchase, Betterment would recommend I allocate more conservatively. Then, the product shows me, in real time, the best and worst case scenario. Based on this information, I will understand my appetite for risk, and adjust the sliders accordingly.

[presentation] optimizing your portfolio with ETFs

P2P Lending's Developing Debt Market

Wealthfront is pivoting — away from the marketplace of RIAs model like Covestor employs and towards fundamental, portfolio management delivered over the Internet.

The firm appears to be joining a growing bunch of firms focusing on the online delivery of financial advice, like:

  • Personal Capital:  a portfolio manager with A-team management, providing portfolio management over the Interwebs (see my interview with the president of Personal Capital)
  • LearnVest: Focused on a younger, female demographic, delivers financial advice, courses, bootcamps, and now, a subscription model that gives clients financial planning and access to CFPs for ongoing advice.
  • Hedgeable: up over 10% in 2011, this upstart — founded by two experienced hedge fundies — provides institutional-type strategies to individuals for insanely affordable fees (some services are free).
  • Jemstep: Plug in your portfolios at different brokers and the Jemstep platform analyzes everything and makes suggestions to help your optimize your holdings. (here’s my interview with Jemstep)
Wealthfront’s new approach is to emphasize its adherence to MPT (Modern Portfolio Theory) and this is the first presentation from the newly-focused firm. I think it’s pretty sweet.