Blockchain and Crypto
‘Back to the basics’: What the SEC’s ruling on DAO tokens mean for the industry
- The SEC has ruled Tuesday ethereum tokens bought by investors in the DAO should be treated as legal U.S. securities
- The ruling won't put an end to token sales, also known as initial coin offerings, but it will slow down the ICO frenzy that's taken place this past year
In a ruling issued Tuesday, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission finally came out and said what the blockchain community has known all along: DAO tokens are securities and are “subject to the requirements of the federal securities law.” The DAO, which stands for Decentralized Autonomous Organization, was the automated, leaderless ethereum-based funding vehicle that suffered a massive hack last year after raising millions of dollars from investors in the token sale. This ruling could be “the end of the beginning phase for blockchain,” said Emin Gun Sirer, associate professor at Cornell University and co-director of the Initiative for Cryptocurrencies and Smart Contracts. “What we were beginning to see with the ICO craze was every Jack and Jill coming up with an old idea, wrapping it up in a token and issuing securities in a virtual company of some kind,” Sirer said. “I hope we will see a return back to the basics. There’s a lot of infrastructure work to be done. People will start to take a close look at their own ICOs and quite a few will fail these rules the SEC applied.” The rules follow a three-pronged test known as the Howey Test. A token is a security if they're selling something for money; are they promising future profits; and the future profits predicated on the efforts of other people and third parties. Here are three key takeaways from the ruling. This doesn't change much If anything, the ruling was “a reminder” of something people already knew was coming and maybe were surprised was taking so long, according to Angela Walch, an associate professor at St. Mary’s University School of Law and research fellow at the Centre for Blockchain Technologies at University College London. “It’s not like they came out with a new conclusion of law or policy, they reminded us that the existing policy applies to these new forms of fundraising,” she said. “The only difference is that we’re doing it in a technological way and calling it something different.” The SEC tends not to give guidance on whether something is a security or not so as not to discourage innovation. In the guidance it didn't even define what a security is or isn't. The fact that the DAO tokens are treated in the eyes of the SEC as legal securities doesn't mean the market is going to suddenly shut down. People that want to continue with their ICO plans can probably do so -- in a way that’s compliant with U.S. securities laws. There is some uncertainty as to what will happen to token sales that will happen in the interim, Walch said. Those that occur after this point are clearly on notice and need to figure out how to comply with securities law. But there’s some ambiguity among people that launched their token sales between the the time of the DAO and now. They’re not necessarily off the hook. "I think the future is bright for non-securities tokens," said Marco Santori, a partner at law firm Cooley LLP, tweeted Wednesday. "This is the first step in a critical maturation process." This isn't the end of ICOs If anything, the guidance could slow down the pace a little bit, according to David Lucking, a partner at law firm Allen & Overy. There has been a lot of focus on ICOs in the last year, and many people have set them up without really considering the legal ramifications. “The SEC is sort of putting the market back on notice: the tokens themselves can be treated as securities, and the platforms on which these tokens trade may be treated as securities exchanges. Both things are regulated in the U.S.,” he said. Of course, not all tokens are securities. The SEC was pretty clear it would take a case by case approach to this kind of activity, “depending on the particular facts and circumstances," making it a nice time to be a lawyer versed in crypto. "It will bring back to the forefront the need to involve lawyers, which for so many people is not that desirable because obviously, the beauty of blockchain and distributed ledger technology is somewhat to disintermediate established ways of doing things and established market participants,” Lucking said. “This reins that in a little bit.” Sirer highlighted the quick emotional reaction by many in the blockchain community -- some gloated about having seen this coming, some worried all tokens were securities and that this might affect their ICOs -- to guidance on a narrow class of activity pretty specific to the DAO. The SEC could issue other findings -- that will inevitably come later, but for now, not just any ICO is binding by the SECs recent findings. “We’re living through a time of ICO mania,” he said. “There are worthless ICOs, there are scam ICOs and all sort of other rogue ICOs that shouldn’t exist. But this ruling doesn't say anything about them -- this is a ruling on the DAO and things like the DAO.” Implications for bitcoin and ethereum Many people that read that guidance couldn't help but notice the SEC’s choice identifier of ethereum as a “virtual currency” as opposed to a virtual “token” or “coin.” “My reading of this is it has no implications for the underlying infrastructure,” Sirer said. “Currencies themselves are not regulated by the SEC, securities are regulated by the SEC.” Plus virtual currencies in the U.S. got their ruling in March 2013. It’s legal to own and transfer them without a license (although the exchange doing the actual transferring may need one).