Green Finance, Member Exclusive

Green Finance Briefing: ESG giving rise to a new political divide

  • ESG is now at the center of a political divide in the US, as Democrats are pushing for policy change while Republicans question their methodologies and intentions.
  • We also look at the rise in federal climate spending, and John Oliver's new episode that explores the topic of greenwashing.

Email a Friend

Green Finance Briefing: ESG giving rise to a new political divide

In the US, the topic of ESG is drawing political battle lines between Democrats and Republicans. These three letters, an unfamiliar acronym to the wider public not too long ago, are now at the center of a new political divide. 

Those on the left feel that ESG is not really about sustainability, but about enterprise value creation. Meanwhile, the right looks at the ESG movement as investors trying to impose a social agenda that hurts companies' profitability.

"Many Democrats see ESG as an opportunity to pursue desired social change through collective action in the form of democratic capitalism. Most Republicans view the ESG movement as an offshoot of the Green New Deal and therefore akin to thinly-veiled Marxism. While there may be some truth to both views, neither accurately reflects marketplace and regulatory developments over the past quarter century," argue researchers Daniel Crowley and Robert Eccles in a paper

The Biden administration has had a strong focus on climate change. Shortly after the election, the SEC started looking into adopting disclosure standards for material ESG risks. Earlier this year, the Commission issued a proposal on climate change disclosures, which received over 5,000 comments from folks all across the spectrum – some thought it wasn't enough, while others thought it was too much. 

The GOP has also been reacting to this new climate-focused agenda. Back in May, former Vice President Mike Pence wrote an op-ed entitled "Republicans can stop ESG political bias" on how ESG is being used by the "woke left" who wants to "conquer corporate America".

A few weeks later, 131 of 211 House Republicans signed a letter to the SEC Chair Gary Gensler that demanded for the climate proposal to be revoked.  

And now, more Republican states are taking action against financial companies that are responding to public pressures and divesting from fossil fuel assets. 

In Texas, the state comptroller issued a list of financial companies that "boycott" the fossil fuel sector, including BlackRock (interestingly, the only US-based company on the list), BNP Paribas, Credit Suisse and UBS, among others. This move requires state pension funds to divest from these companies.

BlackRock responded, with head of US Mark McCombe noting that the company is the largest investor in the state's oil and gas industry, having invested $290 billion in Texas-based assets. McCombe made multiple lobbying trips to Texas while the list was being drawn up, but to no avail, the FT reported.

"Trying to stop a US company from doing business in its own backyard is bad for business. It looks opportunistic in this climate. We have never turned our back on Texas oil and gas companies. This is anti-competitive," he said. 

In Florida, Governor Ron DeSantis banned the state's $186 billion pension fund from investing in ESG assets. DeSantis told a State Board of Administration meeting that ESG policies "are dead on arrival in the state of Florida."

And West Virginia will no longer award state contracts to JPMorgan Chase, Wells Fargo, Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and BlackRock because of the companies' decarbonization targets that require them to reduce financing to coal companies.

The common denominator to be drawn here is that states that are heavily reliant on fossil fuels are not prepared to transition to a clean energy economy, which is the direction being set by Washington. 

The fear of change is understandable, and politicians are wasting no time to capitalize on it. They paint the winds of change as an enemy, although change is inevitable.  

However, what is not being adequately talked about is that the shareholder profits that Republicans are so keen to protect don't actually reflect the true cost of doing business. Democrats also have a massive PR problem – if you're leading the change, there must be adequate communication and transparency. 

My personal view was best summarized by Crowley and Eccles in their paper:

"Sustainability is not new, nor is it mainly about scoring social justice warrior points. Rather, it is about what regulations are necessary to ensure that the assumption of risk by investors is adequately informed".

Chart of the week

Source: Public Tableau

What we're writing

Could the US climate bill be the push the system needed?

The climate bill could catalyze a pivotal moment for the financial services industry to view the clean energy sector as one of opportunity rather than compromise.

"Look under the hood": The difference between ESG and sustainable investing

As ESG investing is becoming increasingly popular and flooded with bad actors, investors are growing wary of greenwashing and overwhelmed by the flurry of options.

The Green Finance Podcast Ep. 7: Connecting capital to sustainable projects with Trenton Allen, CEO of Sustainable Capital Advisors

Climate change awareness is growing, and it's starting to bring more capital along with it. But the ecosystem is still new, and many connections are yet to be made.

Video of the week

What we're reading 

China is beating the U.S. in clean energy. Can America catch up? The race in five charts

With his anti-ESG fund, Vivek Ramaswamy takes a page from the Infowars playbook

World Bank's IFC taps blockchain for carbon offsets

Debt issuers wonder if ESG label is worth it as skepticism spreads

WSJ Opinion: The ESG investing backlash arrives

0 comments on “Green Finance Briefing: ESG giving rise to a new political divide”

10-Q, Member Exclusive

Bank stocks fell like a stone last week, but ended higher ahead of the Fed — what comes next?

  • Two more banks, Credit Suisse and First Republic, faced a crisis in the past week. Where does that leave banks (big and small) now?
  • Block stock fell on a Hindenburg Research short-seller report alleging numerous claims against the company. The report claims that Block has allegedly inflated its user metrics and facilitated fraud.
Sara Khairi | March 27, 2023
10-Q, Member Exclusive

Can MoneyLion gain ground in the long term on the strength of its underlying businesses?

  • MoneyLion's Q4 2022 results show a profitable December -- however, the firm saw net losses for the quarter and year.
  • Oportun reported its fourth quarter 2022 results on Monday. In the revenue line, the company reported $261.9 million, missing estimates by $1.1 million.
Sara Khairi | March 20, 2023
10-Q, Member Exclusive

Is Dave a ‘fintech survivor’ after all?

  • Dave's Q4 2022 results show that this might just be the end of a rocky road for the neobank -- meanwhile, it is bracing for 2023 head-on.
  • Apple's shares regained momentum last week following Goldman Sachs analysts' optimistic outlook -- based on the firm's new product innovation and margin expansion driven by services.
Sara Khairi | March 13, 2023
Member Exclusive

Tearsheet Pro Live #1: ChatGPT, fact and fiction: What FIs should know about the future

  • In this first Tearsheet Pro Live session, editor Zack Miller interviews a Stanford professor and a machine learning scientist about generative AI.
  • Dev Patnaik and Moses Guttmann share their perspectives on the future impact of technology like ChatGPT on financial services.
Zachary Miller | March 09, 2023
10-Q, Member Exclusive

Less focus on Bitcoin and more Cash App inflows — a sound strategy for Block?

  • A week ago, Block reported its Q4'22 results with earnings missing expectations but surpassing gross profit from a year ago.
  • The surge in the stock is owing to the firm’s strong gross profit growth, which was up 40% in Q4 2022 compared to the prior year.
Sara Khairi | March 07, 2023
More Articles